Cómo a través del virus de los medios, se inocula el virus del miedo

Kyosha dijo:
Yo es que había leído que el exceso de vitamina D podía ser perjudicial! Y estuve a punto de comprar vitamina D pero me esperaré a hablar con el médico.
Lo que sí compré fue espirulina (bueno, más que comprar, lo cogí como obsequio en un pedido de otros productos).

Mil gracias por contestar prima 😍🥰😘
Hacer clic para expandir...

Realmente es muy difícil tener exceso de vit D. El sol no aporta esa vitamina, solo la sintetiza.
El pescado graso creo que es el alimento que más vitD tiene y yo la verdad, suelo comer pescado blanco.
A mí el farmacéutico me dijo que el cuerpo expulsa si hay exceso de algo, pero al final un profesional es el que mejor te puede aconsejar en tu caso si quieres introducir suplementos prima!
 
Citla dijo:
Nos lo puedes compartir??
Hacer clic para expandir...

Muy sencillo, comparto a veces cosas de un canal que sigo en Telegram en el hilo MK en el que tú también sueles participar. Lo que dicen ahí me cuadra totalmente.
Los textos sagrados son simbólicos.
En la era tecnológica que vivimos el Anticristo sería la Inteligencia Artificial.
 
En esta guerra atipica en la cual tenemos la mala suerte de vivir, el arma principal es la información. Los cañones más importantes son los fact-checkers - lo que determina cuál información es verídica y cuál fakenews.
Pues bien, cuando te pones a rasgar un poco quién está detrás de los "factcheckers", los que supuestamente detienen la verdad 100tífica, resulta que hacen de juez y parte. Como para fiarse de lo que determinan "fake" y "verídico". :facepalm: :hungover:

RESUMEN :
  • Las grandes empresas tecnológicas, incluido Facebook, manipulan activamente la difusión de la información censurando y silenciando lo que consideran "información errónea"
  • FactCheck.org está financiado, en parte, por la Fundación Robert Wood Johnson, que posee casi 2.000 millones de dólares en acciones de Johnson & Johnson
  • El proyecto SciCheck COVID-19/Vacunación de FactCheck.org, que se centra en la "desinformación" sobre las vacunas, fue posible gracias a una subvención de la Fundación Robert Wood Johnson, fundada por el difunto Robert Wood Johnson II, presidente de Johnson & Johnson de 1932 a 1963.
  • Su director general, Richard Besser, es un ex director (2009) de los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades de EE.UU.
  • Esencialmente, las empresas de vacunas están controlando el flujo de información en las redes sociales sobre las vacunas a través de "verificadores de hechos"

Traducción realizada con la versión gratuita del traductor www.DeepL.com/Translator

Social media has emerged as a primary source of news and other information for Americans, with 53% of adults stating that they “often” or “sometimes” get news from social media. Facebook is the most popular among the social media sites, with 36% of Americans choosing it as a regular source of news, according to a survey conducted by Pew Research Center.1

Big Tech, including Facebook, however, is actively manipulating the spread of information by censoring and silencing whatever it deems to be “misinformation.” They use “fact checkers” for this purpose. Facebook has partnered with FactCheck.org,2 which claims “to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding.”3

But are the fact checkers truly independent? In a series of tweets, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., questioned FactCheck.org’s independence, stating they’re funded by an organization that holds nearly $2 billion of stock in Johnson & Johnson, the maker of a COVID-19 injection.4 As Russel Brand said in the video above:5

“So Facebook, as one of the primary places where people in the world get their information these days has a kind of de facto commitment to objectivity that, if it’s not fulfilled — for example by having its fact checkers funded by Johnson & Johnson — that’s a serious issue.”
Hacer clic para expandir...

Facebook Fact Checkers in Collusion With Vaccine Maker?​

Have you ever wondered who is behind Facebook’s fact checks? FactCheck.org is funded, in part, by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which holds nearly $2 billion in Johnson & Johnson stock. “Bless your heart if you think factcheck.org is an unbiased source of vaccine information,” Massie tweeted.6


According to FactCheck.org, they began a “SciCheck” feature in 2015 that was intended to “increase public knowledge and understanding of science and scientific research.” In December 2021, they launched SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project, which, they state, aims “to increase exposure to accurate information about COVID-19 and vaccines, while decreasing the impact of misinformation.”7

Conveniently, SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project was made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which not only holds billions of Johnson & Johnson stock but was founded by the late Robert Wood Johnson II — Johnson & Johnson’s president from 1932 to 1963.8 What’s more, its CEO, Richard Besser, is a former (2009) director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.9

FactCheck.org states, “The foundation has no control over our editorial decisions,”10 but Facebook’s “independent” arbiters are profiting from the vaccines. “Who pays the paychecks of the factcheckers?” Massie tweeted, again pointing out the glaring conflict that “The vaccine fact checkers at @factcheckdotorg, who claim to be independent, are funded by an organization that holds over $1.8 billion of stock in a vaccine company, and is run by a former director of @CDCgov.”11


Fact Checkers Prey on Vaccine Information​

Daniel Horowitz, senior editor at The Blaze, put it this way, “In other words, the vaccine companies control the flow of information about vaccines. Welcome to the world of ‘independent fact checkers.’”12

What happens when heavily conflicted “fact checkers” control the narrative on social media? Open debate is silenced and science is stifled. It’s comical that FactCheck.org has the gall to state, “[T]he views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.”13

“In fact,” Horowitz said, “the views expressed almost assuredly do reflect the views of the foundation … have you ever seen the organization offer balanced coverage or flag a single post on the other side of this debate as false, no matter how outlandish the claim might be, including articles advocating experimental emergency use authorization vaccines for little children?”14

Horowitz is among those who, like me, have had information they shared censored if they questioned the science behind lockdowns and mask mandates. Other commonly “flagged” articles may discuss potentially lifesaving drugs like ivermectin or mention vitamin D15 and zinc for SARS-CoV-2. But nothing has been more heavily targeted by fact checkers than vaccine “misinformation.”

“Indeed, we all know the goal is to promote only positive information and zero concerns about the vaccine at all costs,” Horowitz stated. “Facebook, which is the largest promoter of their [FactCheck.org’s] work, has openly made this its policy.”16

The Corruption Runs Deep​

NewsGuard is another self-appointed internet watchdog that sells a browser plugin to rate websites on nine criteria of credibility and transparency. It has also been tracking Facebook pages that it claims are “super-spreaders” of COVID-19 information.17 NewsGuard received much of its startup funds from Publicis Groupe, a giant global communications group with divisions that brand imaging, design of digital business platforms, media relations and health care.

Publicis Groupe’s health subsidiary, Publicis Healthcare Communications Group, and its several subsidiaries name Pfizer, Abbott, Allergan, Merck, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Bayer and what they describe as “40 clients in the life sciences industry which includes being a preferred partner with 13 of the top 20 global pharmaceutical companies.”18 In fact, the PR firm that created and ran Purdue Pharma’s deceptive marketing campaigns for the opioid Oxycontin is none other than Publicis.

At the beginning of May 2021, the Massachusetts attorney general filed a lawsuit19 against Publicis Health, accusing the Publicis subsidiary of helping Purdue create the deceptive marketing materials used to mislead doctors into prescribing OxyContin.

Overall, Publicis appears to be playing an important role in the global censorship of information relating to COVID-19, and Publicis Health admitted its involvement in this agenda in an April 2021 tweet, in which the they announced its partnership with NewsGuard, “to fight the ‘infodemic’ of misinformation about COVID-19 and its vaccines.”20

NewsGuard is clearly in the business of censoring the truth and previously classified Mercola.com as fake news because we reported the SARS-CoV-2 virus as potentially having been leaked from the biosafety level 4 (BSL4) laboratory in Wuhan, China.

Seeing how Publicis represents most of the major pharmaceutical companies in the world and funded the creation of NewsGuard, it’s not far-fetched to assume Publicis might influence NewsGuard’s ratings of drug industry competitors, such as alternative health sites. Being a Google partner,21 Publicis also has the ability to bury undesirable views that might hurt its clientele.

NewsGuard’s health-related service, HealthGuard,22 is also partnered with the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) — a progressive cancel-culture leader23 with extensive ties to government and global think tanks that has labeled people questioning the COVID-19 injection as “threats to national security.”

A One-Stop Shop Pushing the COVID-19 Narrative​

These connections, taken together, explain how views that counter the official narrative can be so effectively erased. One of Publicis’ selling points is “the power of one.”24 It’s a one-stop shop, offering clients seamless end-to-end “marketing, communication and digital transformation, driven through the alchemy of data, creativity, media and technology, uniquely positioned to deliver personalized experience at scale.”25

In addition to being a global hub for pharmaceutical marketing as a partner of the World Economic Forum,26 which is leading the call for a Great Reset of the global economy and a complete overhaul of society,27 Publicis is also linked to the technocratic, transhumanist deep state.

Censoring COVID-19 truth and manufacturing pro-industry propaganda simultaneously serves three key masters — Big Pharma, Big Tech and the deep state — as the pandemic is fueling a manufactured psychological operation designed to usher in the Great Reset, all while allowing Big Pharma to make a killing on pandemic vaccines and using the “need” for vaccination as justification for biosurveillance.

To put it another way, if Publicis and FactCheck.org represent the drug industry, and the drug industry wants you to think you’re helpless against COVID-19 without their expensive drugs and vaccines, what do you think Publicis and NewsGuard will rate as “misinformation”?

Preventive strategies and alternative therapies, perhaps? And it doesn’t matter how much science there is to support such therapies, because it’s not about science. It’s about controlling what you believe works.

Conflicted Entities Have Become Societal Regulators​

Social and mainstream media have played an outsized role in deciding who is an “expert” worthy of sharing information and who is not, while those who question the “expert” data or ask for more evidence are vilified — a “dismissive, authoritarian approach ‘in defense of science,’” according to John Ioannidis, professor of medicine and professor of epidemiology and population health at Stanford University, in Tablet.28
The end result is an altered reality in which heavily conflicted corporations have emerged as regulators of society instead of being regulated themselves:29
“Other potentially conflicted entities became the new societal regulators, rather than the ones being regulated. Big Tech companies, which gained trillions of dollars in cumulative market value from the virtual transformation of human life during lockdown, developed powerful censorship machineries that skewed the information available to users on their platforms.
Hacer clic para expandir...
Consultants who made millions of dollars from corporate and government consultation were given prestigious positions, power, and public praise, while unconflicted scientists who worked pro bono but dared to question dominant narratives were smeared as being conflicted.”
Hacer clic para expandir...
Social media and its fact checkers are also skewing science itself via their conflicted “misinformation” labels.
Even healthy skepticism has become viewed as intolerable, while the COVID-19 science cult — made “out of science, expertise, the university system, executive-branch ‘norms,’ the ‘intelligence community,’ the State Department, NGOs, the legacy news media, and the hierarchy of credentialed achievement in general”30 — has been held as gospel during the pandemic.
Increasingly, Big Tech is being trusted to dictate the truth, via conflicted fact checkers indebted to Big Industry through their funding. It’s dangerous to rely on any one source or group of individuals as authorities on truth, as it sets up the path for inevitable censorship. Even under the best circumstances, everyone is subject to their own biases, and when billions of dollars are involved, the bias is impossible to ignore.
Yet, it remains true that the path to the truth depends on continued scientific exploration, open debate, challenges and skepticism — all things that are now being challenged by fact checkers on social media and increasingly seen as anathema due to the authoritarian and conflicted control that has taken over during the pandemic.



https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/10/15/vaccine-fact-checkers.aspx (el artículo va a desaparecer en 45 horas

...dejan a "Pravda" como un mísero diletante...
 
Calcetines82 dijo:
Me encanta leerles! Creen que habra mas posibles confinamientos?
Hacer clic para expandir...

Sí, pero va a ser por el plandemio climático. Que si el sol está produciendo muchas llamaradas solares y es muy peligroso estar en la calle, que si hay demasiada contaminación, que si viene una ola de frío extremo... La mayoría de estos fenómenos los van a provocar los mismos que nos acusan de producir demasiado CO2. La tecnología ya la tienen, excepto para controlar el comportamiento del sol, pero sí lo pueden tapar con alguna capa de compuestos químicos, como pretende Bill Gates.

www.elconfidencial.com

El plan de Bill Gates para frenar el calentamiento global: tapar el Sol

El calentamiento global es uno de los problemas más preocupantes de nuestro planeta, pero el fundador de Microsfot tiene una idea: un escudo artificial para 'desviar' al Sol
www.elconfidencial.com www.elconfidencial.com
 
Citla dijo:
El 8 de Diciembre termina el año de San José (terror de los demonios). Se supone que por estos tiempos ya debió haberse hecho presente el anticristo pero por la protección especial de San José se retrasó todo. Ahora, después del 08/Dic todo se desatará, el ataque será más fuerte (recordemos que es combate espiritual). Cuánto? No sé sabe la fecha pero el rango de tiempo es 1-3 años. Como hay creyentes y no creyentes solo nos queda esperar y ver qué sucede después del 08/Dic (si la famosa vacuna ya es obligatoria, si ya empieza la escasez y por consiguiente la hambruna, cómo van los conflictos bélicos, el tema del agua, el cambio climático...).
Hacer clic para expandir...
Grazie, @Citla
Lo que escribes es muy interesante. Quizás ya hayas leído mi publicación, es la # 39.560.
Parece haber alguna coincidencia con las fechas.

Mientras tanto, para volver al tema de este hilo, en una de las televisiones locales de mi provincia (hay dos y una es peor que la otra) para mantener alta la narrativa del miedo y la presión psicológica, ante la ausencia de muertes en el provincia difundieron un reportaje sobre los muertos (tres, para ser precisos) por el covid-19 ocurrido en la capital regional... o_O
 
Por cierto que ayer por la rambla de Igualada vi a un señor ochentón que parece ser que de repente tuvo una revelación en plan "joder, soy el único que va con mascarilla" al darse cuenta de que todo el mundo estaba sin, incluso una anciana a la que primero miraba fijamente como su última esperanza de poder unirse a alguien para echarle la bronca a otros (había 1.5m de distancia de sobra, no son las ramblas de Barcelona) pero su gozo en un pozo al ver que tampoco llevaba.

Me temo que cuando en 2022 quiten la mascarilla obligatoria en interiores pero la pueda seguir llevando quien quiera van a haber bastantes conflictos y quien sabe si algunos lleguen a las manos. Por el 90% que la seguirán llevando al principio y buscarán bronca con los pioneros que no la lleven.
 
Batsheba dijo:
Muy sencillo, comparto a veces cosas de un canal que sigo en Telegram en el hilo MK en el que tú también sueles participar. Lo que dicen ahí me cuadra totalmente.
Los textos sagrados son simbólicos.
En la era tecnológica que vivimos el Anticristo sería la Inteligencia Artificial.
Hacer clic para expandir...



 
el porqué de las cosas dijo:
En esta guerra atipica en la cual tenemos la mala suerte de vivir, el arma principal es la información. Los cañones más importantes son los fact-checkers - lo que determina cuál información es verídica y cuál fakenews.
Pues bien, cuando te pones a rasgar un poco quién está detrás de los "factcheckers", los que supuestamente detienen la verdad 100tífica, resulta que hacen de juez y parte. Como para fiarse de lo que determinan "fake" y "verídico". :facepalm: :hungover:

RESUMEN :
  • Las grandes empresas tecnológicas, incluido Facebook, manipulan activamente la difusión de la información censurando y silenciando lo que consideran "información errónea"
  • FactCheck.org está financiado, en parte, por la Fundación Robert Wood Johnson, que posee casi 2.000 millones de dólares en acciones de Johnson & Johnson
  • El proyecto SciCheck COVID-19/Vacunación de FactCheck.org, que se centra en la "desinformación" sobre las vacunas, fue posible gracias a una subvención de la Fundación Robert Wood Johnson, fundada por el difunto Robert Wood Johnson II, presidente de Johnson & Johnson de 1932 a 1963.
  • Su director general, Richard Besser, es un ex director (2009) de los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades de EE.UU.
  • Esencialmente, las empresas de vacunas están controlando el flujo de información en las redes sociales sobre las vacunas a través de "verificadores de hechos"

Traducción realizada con la versión gratuita del traductor www.DeepL.com/Translator

Social media has emerged as a primary source of news and other information for Americans, with 53% of adults stating that they “often” or “sometimes” get news from social media. Facebook is the most popular among the social media sites, with 36% of Americans choosing it as a regular source of news, according to a survey conducted by Pew Research Center.1

Big Tech, including Facebook, however, is actively manipulating the spread of information by censoring and silencing whatever it deems to be “misinformation.” They use “fact checkers” for this purpose. Facebook has partnered with FactCheck.org,2 which claims “to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding.”3

But are the fact checkers truly independent? In a series of tweets, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., questioned FactCheck.org’s independence, stating they’re funded by an organization that holds nearly $2 billion of stock in Johnson & Johnson, the maker of a COVID-19 injection.4 As Russel Brand said in the video above:5


Facebook Fact Checkers in Collusion With Vaccine Maker?​

Have you ever wondered who is behind Facebook’s fact checks? FactCheck.org is funded, in part, by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which holds nearly $2 billion in Johnson & Johnson stock. “Bless your heart if you think factcheck.org is an unbiased source of vaccine information,” Massie tweeted.6


According to FactCheck.org, they began a “SciCheck” feature in 2015 that was intended to “increase public knowledge and understanding of science and scientific research.” In December 2021, they launched SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project, which, they state, aims “to increase exposure to accurate information about COVID-19 and vaccines, while decreasing the impact of misinformation.”7

Conveniently, SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project was made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which not only holds billions of Johnson & Johnson stock but was founded by the late Robert Wood Johnson II — Johnson & Johnson’s president from 1932 to 1963.8 What’s more, its CEO, Richard Besser, is a former (2009) director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.9

FactCheck.org states, “The foundation has no control over our editorial decisions,”10 but Facebook’s “independent” arbiters are profiting from the vaccines. “Who pays the paychecks of the factcheckers?” Massie tweeted, again pointing out the glaring conflict that “The vaccine fact checkers at @factcheckdotorg, who claim to be independent, are funded by an organization that holds over $1.8 billion of stock in a vaccine company, and is run by a former director of @CDCgov.”11


Fact Checkers Prey on Vaccine Information​

Daniel Horowitz, senior editor at The Blaze, put it this way, “In other words, the vaccine companies control the flow of information about vaccines. Welcome to the world of ‘independent fact checkers.’”12

What happens when heavily conflicted “fact checkers” control the narrative on social media? Open debate is silenced and science is stifled. It’s comical that FactCheck.org has the gall to state, “[T]he views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.”13

“In fact,” Horowitz said, “the views expressed almost assuredly do reflect the views of the foundation … have you ever seen the organization offer balanced coverage or flag a single post on the other side of this debate as false, no matter how outlandish the claim might be, including articles advocating experimental emergency use authorization vaccines for little children?”14

Horowitz is among those who, like me, have had information they shared censored if they questioned the science behind lockdowns and mask mandates. Other commonly “flagged” articles may discuss potentially lifesaving drugs like ivermectin or mention vitamin D15 and zinc for SARS-CoV-2. But nothing has been more heavily targeted by fact checkers than vaccine “misinformation.”

“Indeed, we all know the goal is to promote only positive information and zero concerns about the vaccine at all costs,” Horowitz stated. “Facebook, which is the largest promoter of their [FactCheck.org’s] work, has openly made this its policy.”16

The Corruption Runs Deep​

NewsGuard is another self-appointed internet watchdog that sells a browser plugin to rate websites on nine criteria of credibility and transparency. It has also been tracking Facebook pages that it claims are “super-spreaders” of COVID-19 information.17 NewsGuard received much of its startup funds from Publicis Groupe, a giant global communications group with divisions that brand imaging, design of digital business platforms, media relations and health care.

Publicis Groupe’s health subsidiary, Publicis Healthcare Communications Group, and its several subsidiaries name Pfizer, Abbott, Allergan, Merck, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Bayer and what they describe as “40 clients in the life sciences industry which includes being a preferred partner with 13 of the top 20 global pharmaceutical companies.”18 In fact, the PR firm that created and ran Purdue Pharma’s deceptive marketing campaigns for the opioid Oxycontin is none other than Publicis.

At the beginning of May 2021, the Massachusetts attorney general filed a lawsuit19 against Publicis Health, accusing the Publicis subsidiary of helping Purdue create the deceptive marketing materials used to mislead doctors into prescribing OxyContin.

Overall, Publicis appears to be playing an important role in the global censorship of information relating to COVID-19, and Publicis Health admitted its involvement in this agenda in an April 2021 tweet, in which the they announced its partnership with NewsGuard, “to fight the ‘infodemic’ of misinformation about COVID-19 and its vaccines.”20

NewsGuard is clearly in the business of censoring the truth and previously classified Mercola.com as fake news because we reported the SARS-CoV-2 virus as potentially having been leaked from the biosafety level 4 (BSL4) laboratory in Wuhan, China.

Seeing how Publicis represents most of the major pharmaceutical companies in the world and funded the creation of NewsGuard, it’s not far-fetched to assume Publicis might influence NewsGuard’s ratings of drug industry competitors, such as alternative health sites. Being a Google partner,21 Publicis also has the ability to bury undesirable views that might hurt its clientele.

NewsGuard’s health-related service, HealthGuard,22 is also partnered with the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) — a progressive cancel-culture leader23 with extensive ties to government and global think tanks that has labeled people questioning the COVID-19 injection as “threats to national security.”

A One-Stop Shop Pushing the COVID-19 Narrative​

These connections, taken together, explain how views that counter the official narrative can be so effectively erased. One of Publicis’ selling points is “the power of one.”24 It’s a one-stop shop, offering clients seamless end-to-end “marketing, communication and digital transformation, driven through the alchemy of data, creativity, media and technology, uniquely positioned to deliver personalized experience at scale.”25

In addition to being a global hub for pharmaceutical marketing as a partner of the World Economic Forum,26 which is leading the call for a Great Reset of the global economy and a complete overhaul of society,27 Publicis is also linked to the technocratic, transhumanist deep state.

Censoring COVID-19 truth and manufacturing pro-industry propaganda simultaneously serves three key masters — Big Pharma, Big Tech and the deep state — as the pandemic is fueling a manufactured psychological operation designed to usher in the Great Reset, all while allowing Big Pharma to make a killing on pandemic vaccines and using the “need” for vaccination as justification for biosurveillance.

To put it another way, if Publicis and FactCheck.org represent the drug industry, and the drug industry wants you to think you’re helpless against COVID-19 without their expensive drugs and vaccines, what do you think Publicis and NewsGuard will rate as “misinformation”?

Preventive strategies and alternative therapies, perhaps? And it doesn’t matter how much science there is to support such therapies, because it’s not about science. It’s about controlling what you believe works.

Conflicted Entities Have Become Societal Regulators​

Social and mainstream media have played an outsized role in deciding who is an “expert” worthy of sharing information and who is not, while those who question the “expert” data or ask for more evidence are vilified — a “dismissive, authoritarian approach ‘in defense of science,’” according to John Ioannidis, professor of medicine and professor of epidemiology and population health at Stanford University, in Tablet.28
The end result is an altered reality in which heavily conflicted corporations have emerged as regulators of society instead of being regulated themselves:29


Social media and its fact checkers are also skewing science itself via their conflicted “misinformation” labels.
Even healthy skepticism has become viewed as intolerable, while the COVID-19 science cult — made “out of science, expertise, the university system, executive-branch ‘norms,’ the ‘intelligence community,’ the State Department, NGOs, the legacy news media, and the hierarchy of credentialed achievement in general”30 — has been held as gospel during the pandemic.
Increasingly, Big Tech is being trusted to dictate the truth, via conflicted fact checkers indebted to Big Industry through their funding. It’s dangerous to rely on any one source or group of individuals as authorities on truth, as it sets up the path for inevitable censorship. Even under the best circumstances, everyone is subject to their own biases, and when billions of dollars are involved, the bias is impossible to ignore.
Yet, it remains true that the path to the truth depends on continued scientific exploration, open debate, challenges and skepticism — all things that are now being challenged by fact checkers on social media and increasingly seen as anathema due to the authoritarian and conflicted control that has taken over during the pandemic.



https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/10/15/vaccine-fact-checkers.aspx (el artículo va a desaparecer en 45 horas

...dejan a "Pravda" como un mísero diletante...
Hacer clic para expandir...
Perdón por la autocita...pero el artículo no tiene desperdicio...os traigo traducida la parte final (sobre la parte fáctica - mirad el artículo completo + referencias):

"En otras palabras, las compañías de vacunas controlan el flujo de información sobre las vacunas. Bienvenidos al mundo de los 'verificadores de hechos independientes'".

Una ventanilla única que impulsa la narrativa de COVID-19

Estas conexiones, tomadas en conjunto, explican cómo las opiniones contrarias a la narrativa oficial pueden ser borradas con tanta eficacia. Uno de los puntos de venta de Publicis es "el poder de uno".24 Es una ventanilla única que ofrece a los clientes - ¡¡¡principalmente los Big Pharma!!!, nota mía - "marketing, comunicación y transformación digital de principio a fin, impulsados por la alquimia de los datos, la creatividad, los medios de comunicación y la tecnología, en una posición única para ofrecer una experiencia personalizada a escala".25

Además de ser un centro mundial para el marketing farmacéutico como socio del Foro Económico Mundial26 , que lidera el llamamiento a un Gran Reajuste de la economía mundial y una revisión completa de la sociedad27 , Publicis también está vinculada al Estado profundo tecnocrático y transhumanista.

Censurar la verdad de la COVID-19 y fabricar propaganda a favor de la industria sirve simultáneamente a tres amos clave -la Gran Farmacia, la Gran Tecnología y el Estado profundo-, ya que la pandemia está alimentando una operación psicológica fabricada diseñada para marcar el comienzo del Gran Reseteo, todo ello mientras permite a la Gran Farmacia hacer una fortuna con las vacunas pandémicas y utilizar la "necesidad" de la vacunación como justificación para la biovigilancia.

Por decirlo de otro modo, si Publicis y FactCheck.org representan a la industria farmacéutica, y la industria farmacéutica quiere que pienses que estás indefenso ante el COVID-19 sin sus caros medicamentos y vacunas, ¿qué crees que Publicis y NewsGuard calificarán de "desinformación"?

¿Estrategias preventivas y terapias alternativas, tal vez? Y no importa cuánta ciencia haya para apoyar tales terapias, porque no se trata de ciencia. Se trata de controlar lo que se cree que funciona.

Las entidades en conflicto se han convertido en reguladores de la sociedad

Los medios de comunicación social y los principales medios de comunicación han desempeñado un papel excesivo a la hora de decidir quién es un "experto" digno de compartir información y quién no, mientras que quienes cuestionan los datos de los "expertos" o piden más pruebas son vilipendiados: un "enfoque despectivo y autoritario 'en defensa de la ciencia' (=100sia)", según John Ioannidis, profesor de medicina y catedrático de epidemiología y salud de la población en la Universidad de Stanford, en Tablet.28

El resultado final es una realidad alterada en la que las corporaciones fuertemente conflictivas han surgido como reguladores de la sociedad en lugar de ser ellos mismos regulados29
 
Debes estar registrado para responder.

Temas Similares

Amigas del pasado
2
Respuestas
21
Visitas
742
Miacoluchi
M
¿Cómo adaptarse a una nueva ciudad?
2
Respuestas
14
Visitas
1K
MagdalenaLlorona
M
El papa francisco y los seminarios
2 3
Respuestas
26
Visitas
451
Melodye
M
Cómo proceder en dos precesos de selección solapados
Respuestas
4
Visitas
474
TheScientist
T
El otro gran problema de los alquileres: NO SE ACEPTAN MASCOTAS.
8 9 10
Respuestas
114
Visitas
7K
Cocoaeve
C
Back