Los Sussex vs grupo de prensa.


Ya nadie se calla.



Y recuerdo que en una parte de Sussex reclamaron que no querían que los Frog usaran el nombre Sussex para representarlos. Harry debería ver que eso no es prensa, esos son ciudadanos de UK, ciudadanos que los mantienen con sus impuestos y ciudadanos que se supone que la CR (él como parte de la misma) representa.

Que lea los comentarios en los medios, que lea twitter. Por supuesto que hay promotores-imparciales-detractores, como en todo. Pero si ve que el número de críticas es alarmante, que hagan una autoevaluación.

Que dejen de comprar "fórmulas mágicas" con equipos de RRPP que usan tácticas más que dudosas para limpiarles la cara.
No sirve solo pagar periodistas-blogs-foros para que hablen bien de ellos si siguen comportándose como celebrities y con maneras hipócritas. En este tiempo de redes las opiniones surgen como hongos en todas partes y eso no lo podrán acallar con dinero.

Lo que tienen es que sentarse a analizar su comportamiento. Si no desean adaptar su conducta a lo esperado por ellos, si desean ser libres y comportarse como les provoque, entonces que no vayan en giras de representación de UK, ni de la CR. Que renuncien a todo privilegio que les viene por ser miembros de la CR y se dediquen a lo que deseen.
 

Ya nadie se calla.

Como dije abrieron la caja de Pandora .., ellos que son bien tonticos y banales no van a poder contra una industria tan capaz , creativa , con esta demanda se ganaron la rifa de la burla y ataque , se les acabo la tregua .

Cuando uno va a dar un paso en contra de alguien , asi sea que uno lo considera que es lo justo, debe calcular como va ha ser la respuesta o respuestas.. por que siempre las hay, Medir capacidad de respuesta ante ellas , estudiar y concretar apoyos antes , ademas de estudiar debilidades ... nada de esto basico lo hicieron , van ha salir con con peor reputacion de la que entraron.
 
Última edición:
Lo podrian hacer si no tuvieran un cargo institucional... pero mientras cobren por un puesto publico , no pueden dar su version , y anular criticas. Lo proximo en esa linea de ideas , es que creen una productora y canal de divulgacion de informacion sobre ellos & sus fundaciones.

Un Canal 24 horas?
 
Esto comenzó con Meghan dando entrevista diciendo que se querían mucho cuando aún no había comunicado oficial en Inglaterra, siguió con el pedido de Harry de que dejeran tranquila a su "novia" y sigue. Creo que Harry por su corta edad vivió la relación de la prensa con su madre de una manera en la que los niños no comprenden del todo, todo. Así le ha quedado un odio visceral por ellos. Lo que no han comprendido Harry y su hermano William es que su madre también se valía de la prensa. Ella usaba a la prensa, en los últimos años más, para comunicar a la familia real su desagrado nada más acordarse de la entrevista que concedió revelando que su matrimonio era un matrimonio de tres. Luego y ya separada y luego divorciada usó a la prensa mediante las fotos que le tomaban para mostrar su imagen renovada, sus trajes más cortos, más escotados y luego se encarriló por el lado de las causas beneficas que en eso si hay que sacarse el sombrero. Harry tiene terror que su esposa se vea afectada por la prensa y por cualquier cosa que pueda hacerla sentirse infeliz. Siempre me llamó la atención que en la primera aparición luego de mostrar el anillo Harry dijera que Megan lo había conocido por lo que realmente era, que no lo conocía por la prensa...... muy viva ella de hacerle creer eso. Sintetizando, que esto ya parece un libro, Harry hará todo lo que esté a su alcance, que es mucho, para que Meghan esté feliz, tenga toda la libertad de acción que pueda tener teniendo en cuenta la familia de la que es parte y guay del que se oponga porque ese si que si se va. Si un psicologo agarrara el caso diría: está cuidando a su esposa todo lo que su padre no cuidó a su madre y tampoco el por su corta edad. Duelos no resueltos, lazos que aún duelen. La imagen de Diana está presidendo la vida de Harry y no desde los lindos recuerdos, desde el dolor y el abandono. He dicho.
Es porque en la cebezita de cierta persona que se cree que es la misma Diana, la que le insiste a este bobo que la prensa es la que la esta arruinando todo lo que ella hace. Esto que esta pasando simplemente deja ver a Harry como lo que es un monumental bobo. Alguién sinceramente se creía la nueva lady Di y que iba a manipular a la prensa a su antojo, MM se ha estrellado estrepitosamente, creo que ya se dió cuenta que no es lsdy Di, que la prensa no la adula y alaba como creía que sería (no olvidar la entrada truinfal con su vestido negro y con su mano sobre el vientre en la gala donde llegó sin previo aviso) y lo que es peor que no saben como salir de esta situación. Ya me imagino esa casa de las ranas, a puros gritos.
 
Creo que es una nueva demanda

Screenshot+2019-10-04+at+16.39.46.png
WORLD EXCLUSIVE: Prince Harry Sues The Sun and Mirror in Escalating War on Tabloids
October 4, 2019 Byline Investigations
PRINCE Harry is suing the UK tabloid papers of both Rupert Murdoch and their industry rivals Mirror Group Newspapers for allegedly hacking his phone, Byline Investigates can exclusively reveal.

In a major escalation of his war on Fleet Street, the 35-year-old Duke of Sussex filed documents at the High Court in London last Friday, September 27, via his lawyers Clintons LLP alleging both news groups misused his private information for stories.

It raises for the first time the possibility of a serving member of the Royal family entering the witness box in trials against some of the most powerful media organisations in the world.
A legal source told Byline Investigates: “An appearance by the Prince in the witness box would immediately make this an historic moment in British law.

“There are strong matters of principle at stake here for the prince. A lot of work has gone into preparing these cases to the point they can be formally filed.


“His legal team plainly feels there are cases to be answered here.”
The move comes as the Mail on Sunday prepares to defend itself against a separate legal action launched this week by the Prince and his wife Meghan Duchess of Sussex, 38, via a different law firm, Schillings, alleging the misuse of a private family letter.

In addition to Murdoch’s The Sun and defunct News of the World, the Duke is also suing the publishers of The Mirror titles over unlawful newsgathering activities that stretch back to the editorship of controversial former editor-turned-celebrity Piers Morgan.

Although no formal ‘Particulars of Claim’ are yet publicly available, setting out the broad details of the Prince’s complaints, similar claims to have progressed through the courts have focused on hacking and the “blagging” of personal private medical and communications information.
Byline Investigates understands the Prince’s claim is unlikely to proceed to trial until early 2021 at the soonest, and will focus in part on the activities of private detectives commissioned by The Sun, the News of the World and the Mirror titles.

Hitherto, The Sun’s owners have always denied any wrongdoing on behalf of the paper in relation to unlawful newsgathering.

Media commentator, Professor Brian Cathcart, said the Duke’s legal move will worry newspaper chiefs - with Murdoch’s News UK in particular making a strategy of settling individual hacking claims out of court in order to prevent a ‘generic concealment and destruction’ case that makes serious allegations about a top-level cover up of industrial scale wrongdoing from being publicly aired.

Prof Cathcart said: “An interesting question raised by Harry's latest action – and one which is bound to worry newspaper bosses – is how far he might be prepared to go.
“The Murdoch and Mirror papers have a record of settling phone hacking cases at the door of the court. It costs them a lot of money, but it also prevents a public trial at which executives and reporters past and present would be required to account for themselves and at which all the facts would come into the open.

“It also suits many complainants to settle because, angry though they may be, they are reluctant to risk the costs of a trial.

“That logic may not apply to Prince Harry. It's too early to say, but depending on how much he wants to make the press bosses suffer, he might yet precipitate a sensational civil trial.”

The claim against News UK is likely to make broader allegations than those previously placed on record after the targeting of Prince Harry and his brother Prince William by the News of The World’ and its former Royal Editor, Clive Goodman and in-house private detective Glenn Mulcaire.

The pair were convicted in 2007 for hacking the phone of members of the Royal household.

The cases sparked the phone hacking scandal which has cost Rupert Murdoch an estimated £1bn.

The Mirror has separately set aside £80 million to deal with hundreds of hacking claims that have already been dogging the company for some five years.

More recent hacking claims have levelled serious allegations against The Sun under the editorship of Rebekah Brooks in 2003-2009.

As serving CEO of News UK, Ms Brooks will be directing the legal team at the company on how to deal with Prince Harry’s claim.

The Mirror case will come as a blow to REACH plc, which owns the Mirror titles and the Express, as it has been keen to tell the stock market that the hacking litigation lies in the past.

A legal insider told Byline Investigates: “Piers Morgan has been critical of Harry and Meghan's recourse to law this week against the Mail on Sunday.

“However, most of the Mirror hacking and blagging of Harry and his loved ones, allegedly happened under his watch.’

Morgan was editor of the Daily Mirror from 1995 to 2004, and Editor-in -Chief of the People and Sunday Mirror which are heavily implicated in the industrial scale hacking and blagging that took place in those years.

The insider added: “Morgan might be concerned about this claim as there are also allegations of hacking by his newspaper of Princess Diana before she died, as well as her friends and family after her death, while Morgan's papers were mourning her loss.”

Byline Investigates has asked for comment from Clarence House on behalf of the Prince. We have also sought comment from News UK and Mirror Group Newspapers.

The Duke will be represented by leading privacy barrister David Sherborne, who secured the landmark decision in the 2015 case known as Frost, Gulati and others vs. Mirror Group, the main phone hacking trial judgment so far.

Mr Sherborne has represented hundreds of victims of phone hacking in civil cases at the High Court, going back to 2014.

The press reform group Hacked Off welcomed Prince Harry's decision but criticised the government for cancelling the second part of the Leveson Inquiry

Hacked Off Policy Manager Nathan Sparkes said: “Today’s news that Prince Harry has initiated proceedings against publishers for The Sun and the Daily Mirror for alleged phone hacking shows how much more of the phone hacking scandal may yet reach the public domain.

“Instead of getting to the bottom of phone hacking and press illegality by completing the Leveson Inquiry, the Government instead chose to turn its back on the victims of press abuse and the general public by suppressing the second half of that inquiry fewer than 18 months ago after extensive lobbying from newspaper editors and executives.

“The Government should abandon attempts to curry favour with newspaper publishers and stand up for the thousands of people across the country who have been the victims of illegal or otherwise abusive press behaviour, by establishing Part Two of the Leveson Inquiry and implementing the recommendations of Part One without further delay.”

The news of the Duke’s legal case against News Group Newspapers and Mirror Group Newspapers comes just three days after his wife the Duchess of Sussex launched a legal case against the Mail on Sunday, which is published by Associated News.

The Duchess claims the Mail on Sunday breached her privacy and copyright by publishing a private letter that she sent to her American father.

It means all three of Britain’s major newspaper publishers have now been dragged into the royal privacy row.

This week, newspapers from all three groups have criticised the royal couple for suing the Mail on Sunday.

The criticism was lead by Piers Morgan, who edited the Daily Mirror while phone hacking and the use of illegal private investigators was a daily occurrence.

If Prince Harry’s claim goes all the way to trial, Morgan would be expected to give evidence in defence of his actions while editor.

Despite admissions by Mirror Group that the Daily Mirror was hacking on an industrial scale under his editorship, Piers Morgan has repeatedly denied that he knew about that his reporters were phone hacking, even though he was very close to his reporters, two of his deputies have been found in the High Court to be phone hackers and that he scrutinised how stories were stood-up.

Morgan denied phone hacking at the Leveson Inquiry into press ethics. However, this week he attacked Prince Harry in his column and on Twitter.

On Wednesday, Piers Morgan column in the Mail on Sunday’s digital sister site MailOnline was headlined: ‘Stop playing the victim, Harry - you and Meghan brought the negative press on yourselves, and just when you turn things around, you ruin it all’.

The Duke of Sussex released the unprecedented statement as he announced on the couple's personal website their legal action against the Mail on Sunday.
https://www.bylineinvestigates.com/...tabloids?format=amp&__twitter_impression=true
 
Creo que es una nueva demanda

Ver el archivo adjunto 1184909
WORLD EXCLUSIVE: Prince Harry Sues The Sun and Mirror in Escalating War on Tabloids
October 4, 2019 Byline Investigations
PRINCE Harry is suing the UK tabloid papers of both Rupert Murdoch and their industry rivals Mirror Group Newspapers for allegedly hacking his phone, Byline Investigates can exclusively reveal.

In a major escalation of his war on Fleet Street, the 35-year-old Duke of Sussex filed documents at the High Court in London last Friday, September 27, via his lawyers Clintons LLP alleging both news groups misused his private information for stories.

It raises for the first time the possibility of a serving member of the Royal family entering the witness box in trials against some of the most powerful media organisations in the world.
A legal source told Byline Investigates: “An appearance by the Prince in the witness box would immediately make this an historic moment in British law.

“There are strong matters of principle at stake here for the prince. A lot of work has gone into preparing these cases to the point they can be formally filed.


“His legal team plainly feels there are cases to be answered here.”
The move comes as the Mail on Sunday prepares to defend itself against a separate legal action launched this week by the Prince and his wife Meghan Duchess of Sussex, 38, via a different law firm, Schillings, alleging the misuse of a private family letter.

In addition to Murdoch’s The Sun and defunct News of the World, the Duke is also suing the publishers of The Mirror titles over unlawful newsgathering activities that stretch back to the editorship of controversial former editor-turned-celebrity Piers Morgan.

Although no formal ‘Particulars of Claim’ are yet publicly available, setting out the broad details of the Prince’s complaints, similar claims to have progressed through the courts have focused on hacking and the “blagging” of personal private medical and communications information.
Byline Investigates understands the Prince’s claim is unlikely to proceed to trial until early 2021 at the soonest, and will focus in part on the activities of private detectives commissioned by The Sun, the News of the World and the Mirror titles.

Hitherto, The Sun’s owners have always denied any wrongdoing on behalf of the paper in relation to unlawful newsgathering.

Media commentator, Professor Brian Cathcart, said the Duke’s legal move will worry newspaper chiefs - with Murdoch’s News UK in particular making a strategy of settling individual hacking claims out of court in order to prevent a ‘generic concealment and destruction’ case that makes serious allegations about a top-level cover up of industrial scale wrongdoing from being publicly aired.

Prof Cathcart said: “An interesting question raised by Harry's latest action – and one which is bound to worry newspaper bosses – is how far he might be prepared to go.
“The Murdoch and Mirror papers have a record of settling phone hacking cases at the door of the court. It costs them a lot of money, but it also prevents a public trial at which executives and reporters past and present would be required to account for themselves and at which all the facts would come into the open.

“It also suits many complainants to settle because, angry though they may be, they are reluctant to risk the costs of a trial.

“That logic may not apply to Prince Harry. It's too early to say, but depending on how much he wants to make the press bosses suffer, he might yet precipitate a sensational civil trial.”

The claim against News UK is likely to make broader allegations than those previously placed on record after the targeting of Prince Harry and his brother Prince William by the News of The World’ and its former Royal Editor, Clive Goodman and in-house private detective Glenn Mulcaire.

The pair were convicted in 2007 for hacking the phone of members of the Royal household.

The cases sparked the phone hacking scandal which has cost Rupert Murdoch an estimated £1bn.

The Mirror has separately set aside £80 million to deal with hundreds of hacking claims that have already been dogging the company for some five years.

More recent hacking claims have levelled serious allegations against The Sun under the editorship of Rebekah Brooks in 2003-2009.

As serving CEO of News UK, Ms Brooks will be directing the legal team at the company on how to deal with Prince Harry’s claim.

The Mirror case will come as a blow to REACH plc, which owns the Mirror titles and the Express, as it has been keen to tell the stock market that the hacking litigation lies in the past.

A legal insider told Byline Investigates: “Piers Morgan has been critical of Harry and Meghan's recourse to law this week against the Mail on Sunday.

“However, most of the Mirror hacking and blagging of Harry and his loved ones, allegedly happened under his watch.’

Morgan was editor of the Daily Mirror from 1995 to 2004, and Editor-in -Chief of the People and Sunday Mirror which are heavily implicated in the industrial scale hacking and blagging that took place in those years.

The insider added: “Morgan might be concerned about this claim as there are also allegations of hacking by his newspaper of Princess Diana before she died, as well as her friends and family after her death, while Morgan's papers were mourning her loss.”

Byline Investigates has asked for comment from Clarence House on behalf of the Prince. We have also sought comment from News UK and Mirror Group Newspapers.

The Duke will be represented by leading privacy barrister David Sherborne, who secured the landmark decision in the 2015 case known as Frost, Gulati and others vs. Mirror Group, the main phone hacking trial judgment so far.

Mr Sherborne has represented hundreds of victims of phone hacking in civil cases at the High Court, going back to 2014.

The press reform group Hacked Off welcomed Prince Harry's decision but criticised the government for cancelling the second part of the Leveson Inquiry

Hacked Off Policy Manager Nathan Sparkes said: “Today’s news that Prince Harry has initiated proceedings against publishers for The Sun and the Daily Mirror for alleged phone hacking shows how much more of the phone hacking scandal may yet reach the public domain.

“Instead of getting to the bottom of phone hacking and press illegality by completing the Leveson Inquiry, the Government instead chose to turn its back on the victims of press abuse and the general public by suppressing the second half of that inquiry fewer than 18 months ago after extensive lobbying from newspaper editors and executives.

“The Government should abandon attempts to curry favour with newspaper publishers and stand up for the thousands of people across the country who have been the victims of illegal or otherwise abusive press behaviour, by establishing Part Two of the Leveson Inquiry and implementing the recommendations of Part One without further delay.”

The news of the Duke’s legal case against News Group Newspapers and Mirror Group Newspapers comes just three days after his wife the Duchess of Sussex launched a legal case against the Mail on Sunday, which is published by Associated News.

The Duchess claims the Mail on Sunday breached her privacy and copyright by publishing a private letter that she sent to her American father.

It means all three of Britain’s major newspaper publishers have now been dragged into the royal privacy row.

This week, newspapers from all three groups have criticised the royal couple for suing the Mail on Sunday.

The criticism was lead by Piers Morgan, who edited the Daily Mirror while phone hacking and the use of illegal private investigators was a daily occurrence.

If Prince Harry’s claim goes all the way to trial, Morgan would be expected to give evidence in defence of his actions while editor.

Despite admissions by Mirror Group that the Daily Mirror was hacking on an industrial scale under his editorship, Piers Morgan has repeatedly denied that he knew about that his reporters were phone hacking, even though he was very close to his reporters, two of his deputies have been found in the High Court to be phone hackers and that he scrutinised how stories were stood-up.

Morgan denied phone hacking at the Leveson Inquiry into press ethics. However, this week he attacked Prince Harry in his column and on Twitter.

On Wednesday, Piers Morgan column in the Mail on Sunday’s digital sister site MailOnline was headlined: ‘Stop playing the victim, Harry - you and Meghan brought the negative press on yourselves, and just when you turn things around, you ruin it all’.

The Duke of Sussex released the unprecedented statement as he announced on the couple's personal website their legal action against the Mail on Sunday.
https://www.bylineinvestigates.com/...tabloids?format=amp&__twitter_impression=true


prince-harry-1534358532.jpg
 
Lo podrian hacer si no tuvieran un cargo institucional... pero mientras cobren por un puesto publico , no pueden dar su version , y anular criticas. Lo proximo en esa linea de ideas , es que creen una productora y canal de divulgacion de informacion sobre ellos & sus fundaciones.

Claro que no lo pueden hacer mientras tengan un cargo constitucional, pero a saber que es lo que ellos quieren.

Como le dije a otra coti, hacer caja para su fundación?.
 
Creo que es una nueva demanda

Ver el archivo adjunto 1184909
WORLD EXCLUSIVE: Prince Harry Sues The Sun and Mirror in Escalating War on Tabloids
October 4, 2019 Byline Investigations
PRINCE Harry is suing the UK tabloid papers of both Rupert Murdoch and their industry rivals Mirror Group Newspapers for allegedly hacking his phone, Byline Investigates can exclusively reveal.

In a major escalation of his war on Fleet Street, the 35-year-old Duke of Sussex filed documents at the High Court in London last Friday, September 27, via his lawyers Clintons LLP alleging both news groups misused his private information for stories.

It raises for the first time the possibility of a serving member of the Royal family entering the witness box in trials against some of the most powerful media organisations in the world.
A legal source told Byline Investigates: “An appearance by the Prince in the witness box would immediately make this an historic moment in British law.

“There are strong matters of principle at stake here for the prince. A lot of work has gone into preparing these cases to the point they can be formally filed.


“His legal team plainly feels there are cases to be answered here.”
The move comes as the Mail on Sunday prepares to defend itself against a separate legal action launched this week by the Prince and his wife Meghan Duchess of Sussex, 38, via a different law firm, Schillings, alleging the misuse of a private family letter.

In addition to Murdoch’s The Sun and defunct News of the World, the Duke is also suing the publishers of The Mirror titles over unlawful newsgathering activities that stretch back to the editorship of controversial former editor-turned-celebrity Piers Morgan.

Although no formal ‘Particulars of Claim’ are yet publicly available, setting out the broad details of the Prince’s complaints, similar claims to have progressed through the courts have focused on hacking and the “blagging” of personal private medical and communications information.
Byline Investigates understands the Prince’s claim is unlikely to proceed to trial until early 2021 at the soonest, and will focus in part on the activities of private detectives commissioned by The Sun, the News of the World and the Mirror titles.

Hitherto, The Sun’s owners have always denied any wrongdoing on behalf of the paper in relation to unlawful newsgathering.

Media commentator, Professor Brian Cathcart, said the Duke’s legal move will worry newspaper chiefs - with Murdoch’s News UK in particular making a strategy of settling individual hacking claims out of court in order to prevent a ‘generic concealment and destruction’ case that makes serious allegations about a top-level cover up of industrial scale wrongdoing from being publicly aired.

Prof Cathcart said: “An interesting question raised by Harry's latest action – and one which is bound to worry newspaper bosses – is how far he might be prepared to go.
“The Murdoch and Mirror papers have a record of settling phone hacking cases at the door of the court. It costs them a lot of money, but it also prevents a public trial at which executives and reporters past and present would be required to account for themselves and at which all the facts would come into the open.

“It also suits many complainants to settle because, angry though they may be, they are reluctant to risk the costs of a trial.

“That logic may not apply to Prince Harry. It's too early to say, but depending on how much he wants to make the press bosses suffer, he might yet precipitate a sensational civil trial.”

The claim against News UK is likely to make broader allegations than those previously placed on record after the targeting of Prince Harry and his brother Prince William by the News of The World’ and its former Royal Editor, Clive Goodman and in-house private detective Glenn Mulcaire.

The pair were convicted in 2007 for hacking the phone of members of the Royal household.

The cases sparked the phone hacking scandal which has cost Rupert Murdoch an estimated £1bn.

The Mirror has separately set aside £80 million to deal with hundreds of hacking claims that have already been dogging the company for some five years.

More recent hacking claims have levelled serious allegations against The Sun under the editorship of Rebekah Brooks in 2003-2009.

As serving CEO of News UK, Ms Brooks will be directing the legal team at the company on how to deal with Prince Harry’s claim.

The Mirror case will come as a blow to REACH plc, which owns the Mirror titles and the Express, as it has been keen to tell the stock market that the hacking litigation lies in the past.

A legal insider told Byline Investigates: “Piers Morgan has been critical of Harry and Meghan's recourse to law this week against the Mail on Sunday.

“However, most of the Mirror hacking and blagging of Harry and his loved ones, allegedly happened under his watch.’

Morgan was editor of the Daily Mirror from 1995 to 2004, and Editor-in -Chief of the People and Sunday Mirror which are heavily implicated in the industrial scale hacking and blagging that took place in those years.

The insider added: “Morgan might be concerned about this claim as there are also allegations of hacking by his newspaper of Princess Diana before she died, as well as her friends and family after her death, while Morgan's papers were mourning her loss.”

Byline Investigates has asked for comment from Clarence House on behalf of the Prince. We have also sought comment from News UK and Mirror Group Newspapers.

The Duke will be represented by leading privacy barrister David Sherborne, who secured the landmark decision in the 2015 case known as Frost, Gulati and others vs. Mirror Group, the main phone hacking trial judgment so far.

Mr Sherborne has represented hundreds of victims of phone hacking in civil cases at the High Court, going back to 2014.

The press reform group Hacked Off welcomed Prince Harry's decision but criticised the government for cancelling the second part of the Leveson Inquiry

Hacked Off Policy Manager Nathan Sparkes said: “Today’s news that Prince Harry has initiated proceedings against publishers for The Sun and the Daily Mirror for alleged phone hacking shows how much more of the phone hacking scandal may yet reach the public domain.

“Instead of getting to the bottom of phone hacking and press illegality by completing the Leveson Inquiry, the Government instead chose to turn its back on the victims of press abuse and the general public by suppressing the second half of that inquiry fewer than 18 months ago after extensive lobbying from newspaper editors and executives.

“The Government should abandon attempts to curry favour with newspaper publishers and stand up for the thousands of people across the country who have been the victims of illegal or otherwise abusive press behaviour, by establishing Part Two of the Leveson Inquiry and implementing the recommendations of Part One without further delay.”

The news of the Duke’s legal case against News Group Newspapers and Mirror Group Newspapers comes just three days after his wife the Duchess of Sussex launched a legal case against the Mail on Sunday, which is published by Associated News.

The Duchess claims the Mail on Sunday breached her privacy and copyright by publishing a private letter that she sent to her American father.

It means all three of Britain’s major newspaper publishers have now been dragged into the royal privacy row.

This week, newspapers from all three groups have criticised the royal couple for suing the Mail on Sunday.

The criticism was lead by Piers Morgan, who edited the Daily Mirror while phone hacking and the use of illegal private investigators was a daily occurrence.

If Prince Harry’s claim goes all the way to trial, Morgan would be expected to give evidence in defence of his actions while editor.

Despite admissions by Mirror Group that the Daily Mirror was hacking on an industrial scale under his editorship, Piers Morgan has repeatedly denied that he knew about that his reporters were phone hacking, even though he was very close to his reporters, two of his deputies have been found in the High Court to be phone hackers and that he scrutinised how stories were stood-up.

Morgan denied phone hacking at the Leveson Inquiry into press ethics. However, this week he attacked Prince Harry in his column and on Twitter.

On Wednesday, Piers Morgan column in the Mail on Sunday’s digital sister site MailOnline was headlined: ‘Stop playing the victim, Harry - you and Meghan brought the negative press on yourselves, and just when you turn things around, you ruin it all’.

The Duke of Sussex released the unprecedented statement as he announced on the couple's personal website their legal action against the Mail on Sunday.
https://www.bylineinvestigates.com/...tabloids?format=amp&__twitter_impression=true
 



Esto me llama mucho la atención. Los de News of the World pagaron muy caro el escándalo de intervenir teléfonos. ¿Pueden ser tan torpes en The Sun y en el Mirror para haber recurrido a esto?
¿O las filtraciones provendrán de otro lugar?

Ahora me dejaron pensando porque si Harry da por seguro que les hackearon los teléfonos es porque algunas informaciones que han publicado el Sun y el Mirror son verídicas y para Harry la única explicación sea que tienen intervenidos los teléfonos.
 
Back