EIIL/ISIS: como Al Qaeda, fueron creados por la CIA y la OTAN
- Thread starterLeMiroir
- Start date
Seria la 4ta. decapitacion transmitida por video, esta vez al cooperante británico Allan Henning a quien habian secuestrado 9 meses atras en Syria.
Que horror, son salvajes!!!
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,584
- Reaction score
- 26,300
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,584
- Reaction score
- 26,300
No está relacionado con el ISIS sino con el modus operandi de la política internacional "en cubierta" de los EEUU.
Esta vez ataña a los acontecimientos en Hong Kong.
Curiosos estos disturbios justamente ahora....cuando, entre otras cosas, China acaba de lanzar su bolsa del oro que quita el monopolio de Londres para el comercio del metal precioso; un paso en el marco de la "independización" de los países B(rail)R(ussia)I(india)C(hina)S(outhAfrica).
Aquí está la noticia:
EEUU ahora admite que está financiando "Occupy Central" en Hong Kong
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-now-admits-it-is-funding-occupy-central-in-hong-kong/5405680
Just as the US admitted shortly after the so-called “Arab Spring” began spreading chaos across the Middle East that it had fully funded, trained, and equipped both mob leaders and heavily armed terrorists years in advance, it is now admitted that the US State Department through a myriad of organizations and NGOs is behind the so-called “Occupy Central” protests in Hong Kong.
The Washington Post would report in an article titled, “Hong Kong erupts even as China tightens screws on civil society,” that:
Chinese leaders unnerved by protests elsewhere this year have been steadily tightening controls over civic organizations on the mainland suspected of carrying out the work of foreign powers.
The campaign aims to insulate China from subversive Western ideas such as democracy and freedom of expression, and from the influence, specifically, of U.S. groups that may be trying to promote those values here, experts say. That campaign is long-standing, but it has been prosecuted with renewed vigor under President Xi Jinping, especially after the overthrow of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych following months of street demonstrations in Kiev that were viewed here as explicitly backed by the West.
The Washington Post would also report (emphasis added):
One foreign policy expert, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive subject, said Putin had called Xi to share his concern about the West’s role in Ukraine. Those concerns appear to have filtered down into conversations held over cups of tea in China, according to civil society group members.
“They are very concerned about Color Revolutions, they are very concerned about what is going on in Ukraine,” said the international NGO manager, whose organization is partly financed by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), blamed here for supporting the protests in Kiev’s central Maidan square. “They say, ‘Your money is coming from the same people. Clearly you want to overthrow China.’ ”
Esta vez ataña a los acontecimientos en Hong Kong.
Curiosos estos disturbios justamente ahora....cuando, entre otras cosas, China acaba de lanzar su bolsa del oro que quita el monopolio de Londres para el comercio del metal precioso; un paso en el marco de la "independización" de los países B(rail)R(ussia)I(india)C(hina)S(outhAfrica).
Aquí está la noticia:
EEUU ahora admite que está financiando "Occupy Central" en Hong Kong
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-now-admits-it-is-funding-occupy-central-in-hong-kong/5405680
Just as the US admitted shortly after the so-called “Arab Spring” began spreading chaos across the Middle East that it had fully funded, trained, and equipped both mob leaders and heavily armed terrorists years in advance, it is now admitted that the US State Department through a myriad of organizations and NGOs is behind the so-called “Occupy Central” protests in Hong Kong.
The Washington Post would report in an article titled, “Hong Kong erupts even as China tightens screws on civil society,” that:
Chinese leaders unnerved by protests elsewhere this year have been steadily tightening controls over civic organizations on the mainland suspected of carrying out the work of foreign powers.
The campaign aims to insulate China from subversive Western ideas such as democracy and freedom of expression, and from the influence, specifically, of U.S. groups that may be trying to promote those values here, experts say. That campaign is long-standing, but it has been prosecuted with renewed vigor under President Xi Jinping, especially after the overthrow of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych following months of street demonstrations in Kiev that were viewed here as explicitly backed by the West.
The Washington Post would also report (emphasis added):
One foreign policy expert, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive subject, said Putin had called Xi to share his concern about the West’s role in Ukraine. Those concerns appear to have filtered down into conversations held over cups of tea in China, according to civil society group members.
“They are very concerned about Color Revolutions, they are very concerned about what is going on in Ukraine,” said the international NGO manager, whose organization is partly financed by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), blamed here for supporting the protests in Kiev’s central Maidan square. “They say, ‘Your money is coming from the same people. Clearly you want to overthrow China.’ ”
Congressionally funded with the explicit goal of promoting democracy abroad, NED has long been viewed with suspicion or hostility by the authorities here. But the net of suspicion has widened to encompass such U.S. groups as the Ford Foundation, the International Republican Institute, the Carter Center and the Asia Foundation.
Of course, NED and its many subsidiaries including the International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute do no such thing as “promoting democracy,” and instead are in the business of constructing a global network of neo-imperial administration termed “civil society” that interlocks with the West’s many so-called “international institutions” which in turn are completely controlled by interests in Washington, upon Wall Street, and in the cities of London and Brussels.
Image: While the Washington Post would have readers believe NED is in the business of promoting “freedom of expression” and “democracy” the corporate-financier interests represented on NED’s board of directors are anything but champions of such principles, and are instead notorious for principles precisely the opposite.
The very concept of the United States ”promoting democracy” is scandalous when considering it is embroiled in an invasive global surveillance scandal, guilty of persecuting one unpopular war after another around the planet against the will of its own people and based on verified lies, and brutalizing and abusing its own citizens at home with militarized police cracking down on civilians in towns like Ferguson, Missouri – making China’s police actions against “Occupy Central” protesters pale in comparison. “Promoting democracy” is clearly cover for simply expanding its hegemonic agenda far beyond its borders and at the expense of national sovereignty for all subjected to it, including Americans themselves.
In 2011, similar revelations were made public of the US’ meddling in the so-called “Arab Spring” when the New York Times would report in an article titled, “U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings,” that:
Of course, NED and its many subsidiaries including the International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute do no such thing as “promoting democracy,” and instead are in the business of constructing a global network of neo-imperial administration termed “civil society” that interlocks with the West’s many so-called “international institutions” which in turn are completely controlled by interests in Washington, upon Wall Street, and in the cities of London and Brussels.
Image: While the Washington Post would have readers believe NED is in the business of promoting “freedom of expression” and “democracy” the corporate-financier interests represented on NED’s board of directors are anything but champions of such principles, and are instead notorious for principles precisely the opposite. The very concept of the United States ”promoting democracy” is scandalous when considering it is embroiled in an invasive global surveillance scandal, guilty of persecuting one unpopular war after another around the planet against the will of its own people and based on verified lies, and brutalizing and abusing its own citizens at home with militarized police cracking down on civilians in towns like Ferguson, Missouri – making China’s police actions against “Occupy Central” protesters pale in comparison. “Promoting democracy” is clearly cover for simply expanding its hegemonic agenda far beyond its borders and at the expense of national sovereignty for all subjected to it, including Americans themselves.
In 2011, similar revelations were made public of the US’ meddling in the so-called “Arab Spring” when the New York Times would report in an article titled, “U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings,” that:
A number of the groups and individuals directly involved in the revolts and reforms sweeping the region, including the April 6 Youth Movement in Egypt, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights and grass-roots activists like Entsar Qadhi, a youth leader in Yemen, received training and financing from groups like the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute and Freedom House, a nonprofit human rights organization based in Washington.
The article would also add, regarding NED specifically, that:
The article would also add, regarding NED specifically, that:
The Republican and Democratic institutes are loosely affiliated with the Republican and Democratic Parties. They were created by Congress and are financed through the National Endowment for Democracy, which was set up in 1983 to channel grants for promoting democracy in developing nations. The National Endowment receives about $100 million annually from Congress. Freedom House also gets the bulk of its money from the American government, mainly from the State Department.
Image: US Senator John McCain on stage in Kiev, Ukraine cheerleading US
funded sedition in Eastern Europe. In 2011, McCain would famously taunt
both Russia and China that US-funded subversion was coming their way.
“Occupy Central” is one of many waves that have hit China’s shores since.
Pro-war and interventionist US Senator John McCain had famously taunted both Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and President Xi Jinping’s predecessor in 2011 that the US subversion sweeping the Middle East was soon headed toward Moscow and Beijing. The Atlantic in a 2011 article titled, “The Arab Spring: ‘A Virus That Will Attack Moscow and Beijing’,” would report that:
Image: US Senator John McCain on stage in Kiev, Ukraine cheerleading US
funded sedition in Eastern Europe. In 2011, McCain would famously taunt
both Russia and China that US-funded subversion was coming their way.
“Occupy Central” is one of many waves that have hit China’s shores since.
Pro-war and interventionist US Senator John McCain had famously taunted both Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and President Xi Jinping’s predecessor in 2011 that the US subversion sweeping the Middle East was soon headed toward Moscow and Beijing. The Atlantic in a 2011 article titled, “The Arab Spring: ‘A Virus That Will Attack Moscow and Beijing’,” would report that:
He [McCain] said, “A year ago, Ben-Ali and Gaddafi were not in power. Assad won’t be in power this time next year. This Arab Spring is a virus that will attack Moscow and Beijing.” McCain then walked off the stage.
Considering the overt foreign-funded nature of not only the “Arab Spring,” but now “Occupy Central,” and considering the chaos, death, destabilization, and collapse suffered by victims of previous US subversion, “Occupy Central” can be painted in a new light – a mob of dupes being used to destroy their own home – all while abusing the principles of “democracy” behind which is couched an insidious, diametrically opposed foreign imposed tyranny driven by immense, global spanning corporate-financier interests that fear and actively destroy competition. In particular, this global hegemon seeks to suppress the reemergence of Russia as a global power, and prevent the rise of China itself upon the world’s stage.
The regressive agenda of “Occupy Central’s” US-backed leadership, and their shameless exploitation of the good intentions of the many young people ensnared by their gimmicks, poses a threat in reality every bit as dangerous as the “threat” they claim Beijing poses to the island of Hong Kong and its people. Hopefully the people of China, and the many people around the world looking on as “Occupy Central” unfolds, will realize this foreign-driven gambit and stop it before it exacts the heavy toll it has on nations that have fallen victim to it before – Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Egypt, and many others.
Considering the overt foreign-funded nature of not only the “Arab Spring,” but now “Occupy Central,” and considering the chaos, death, destabilization, and collapse suffered by victims of previous US subversion, “Occupy Central” can be painted in a new light – a mob of dupes being used to destroy their own home – all while abusing the principles of “democracy” behind which is couched an insidious, diametrically opposed foreign imposed tyranny driven by immense, global spanning corporate-financier interests that fear and actively destroy competition. In particular, this global hegemon seeks to suppress the reemergence of Russia as a global power, and prevent the rise of China itself upon the world’s stage.
The regressive agenda of “Occupy Central’s” US-backed leadership, and their shameless exploitation of the good intentions of the many young people ensnared by their gimmicks, poses a threat in reality every bit as dangerous as the “threat” they claim Beijing poses to the island of Hong Kong and its people. Hopefully the people of China, and the many people around the world looking on as “Occupy Central” unfolds, will realize this foreign-driven gambit and stop it before it exacts the heavy toll it has on nations that have fallen victim to it before – Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Egypt, and many others.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,584
- Reaction score
- 26,300
http://www.theatlantic.com/internat...s-that-will-attack-moscow-and-beijing/248762/
The Arab Spring: 'A Virus That Will Attack Moscow and Beijing'
STEVE CLEMONSNOV 19 2011, 5:53 AM ET
Former presidential candidate and US Senator John McCain's comment was a biting kicker at opening dinner of 2011 Halifax International Security Forum.
(photo credit: Halifax the Forum)
I'm up at the 2011 Halifax International Security Forum where 18 defense ministers and a who's who of the international defense and security community have assembled. The forum is modestly sized with about 200 attendees -- but the diversity of perspective here is impressive.
I'll have a post up in a while on US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta's appeal to allies in an "era of austerity" -- but wanted to get something up now that John McCain tagged on to his otherwise very humorous remarks at the opening dinner last night.
After Senator Mark Udall used his time on stage mostly to joke about American and Canadian hockey -- a theme nearly everyone here can't stay away from -- McCain jested that in Arizona, mothers tell their kids that they'll never grow up to be President -- as Barry Goldwater, Bruce Babbitt, Morris Udall (Mark's dad), and McCain had all tried and failed. McCain was truly funny -- his sense of timing better than Udall's.
But then sensing that a crowd of generals, admirals, defense ministers, and national security policy practitioners prefer gravitas to slapstick, McCain dropped a pretty big zinger on the crowd.
He said, "A year ago, Ben-Ali and Gaddafi were not in power. Assad won't be in power this time next year. This Arab Spring is a virus that will attack Moscow and Beijing." McCain then walked off the stage.
Comparing the Arab Spring to a virus is not new for the Senator -- but to my knowledge, coupling Russia and China to the comment is.
Senator McCain's framing reflects a triumphalism bouncing around at this conference. It sees the Arab Spring as a product of Western design -- and potentially as a tool to take on other non-democratic governments.
At an earlier session, Senator Udall said that those who believed that the Arab Spring was an organic revolution from within these countries were wrong -- and that the West and NATO in particular had been primary drivers of results in Libya -- and that the West had helped animate and move affairs in Egypt. Udall provocatively added Syria to that list as well.
But John McCain's biting kicker last night would have been seriously jarring to any Chinese or Russian defense types who might have been in the room. They seem to be the only ones not here.
McCain may be right that fake democracies like Russia and authoritarian regimes like China may face the same kinds of disruptions in their locks on power that Gaddafi and Ben-Ali did, but to frame this possibility as objective -- which was the tone of McCain's comment -- seriously complicates the global security picture particularly when the US and Europe are hoping to draw Russia and China into a much more cooperative arrangement confining Iran's options in the world.
It's tough to partner with regimes on one front while essentially calling for their collapse and downfall on another.
Jump to Comments (9)
The Arab Spring: 'A Virus That Will Attack Moscow and Beijing'
STEVE CLEMONSNOV 19 2011, 5:53 AM ET
Former presidential candidate and US Senator John McCain's comment was a biting kicker at opening dinner of 2011 Halifax International Security Forum.
(photo credit: Halifax the Forum)I'm up at the 2011 Halifax International Security Forum where 18 defense ministers and a who's who of the international defense and security community have assembled. The forum is modestly sized with about 200 attendees -- but the diversity of perspective here is impressive.
I'll have a post up in a while on US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta's appeal to allies in an "era of austerity" -- but wanted to get something up now that John McCain tagged on to his otherwise very humorous remarks at the opening dinner last night.
After Senator Mark Udall used his time on stage mostly to joke about American and Canadian hockey -- a theme nearly everyone here can't stay away from -- McCain jested that in Arizona, mothers tell their kids that they'll never grow up to be President -- as Barry Goldwater, Bruce Babbitt, Morris Udall (Mark's dad), and McCain had all tried and failed. McCain was truly funny -- his sense of timing better than Udall's.
But then sensing that a crowd of generals, admirals, defense ministers, and national security policy practitioners prefer gravitas to slapstick, McCain dropped a pretty big zinger on the crowd.
He said, "A year ago, Ben-Ali and Gaddafi were not in power. Assad won't be in power this time next year. This Arab Spring is a virus that will attack Moscow and Beijing." McCain then walked off the stage.
Comparing the Arab Spring to a virus is not new for the Senator -- but to my knowledge, coupling Russia and China to the comment is.
Senator McCain's framing reflects a triumphalism bouncing around at this conference. It sees the Arab Spring as a product of Western design -- and potentially as a tool to take on other non-democratic governments.
At an earlier session, Senator Udall said that those who believed that the Arab Spring was an organic revolution from within these countries were wrong -- and that the West and NATO in particular had been primary drivers of results in Libya -- and that the West had helped animate and move affairs in Egypt. Udall provocatively added Syria to that list as well.
But John McCain's biting kicker last night would have been seriously jarring to any Chinese or Russian defense types who might have been in the room. They seem to be the only ones not here.
McCain may be right that fake democracies like Russia and authoritarian regimes like China may face the same kinds of disruptions in their locks on power that Gaddafi and Ben-Ali did, but to frame this possibility as objective -- which was the tone of McCain's comment -- seriously complicates the global security picture particularly when the US and Europe are hoping to draw Russia and China into a much more cooperative arrangement confining Iran's options in the world.
It's tough to partner with regimes on one front while essentially calling for their collapse and downfall on another.
Jump to Comments (9)
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,584
- Reaction score
- 26,300
...Y ahora viene el turno de Líbano:
Detenido líder de EIIL revela complots contra El Líbano
Actualizado:
28/10/2014 10:24 GMT
Imprimir
El Tamaño del Texto:
25 2 Google +0 27 0
Ahmad Miqati, uno de los más altos dirigentes del grupo takfirí EIIL (Daesh, en árabe), ha desvelado que el objetivo principal de sus operaciones en El Líbano ha sido crear un “emirato de Daesh” en el norte libanés y, de esa manera, facilitar la anexión de la región siria de Al-Qalamun al mar Mediterráneo.
“La primera fase de nuestros programas consistía en anexar Al-Qalamun de Siria a la costa mediterránea a través de la región norteña de El Líbano (...) y teníamos previsto efectuarla dentro de un mes (debido a la necesidad del EIIL a un puerto)”, ha detallado Miqati, apodado Abu Hoda, tras su detención el pasado jueves por el Ejército libanés.
Según ha informado este martes la agencia iraní de noticias ‘IRNA’, pueblos como Bakhaoun, Aassoun, Sir Ed Donie, y Bqaa Safrin, incluían los planes de Abu Hoda destinados a crear una zona segura para el despliegue de los integrantes de Daesh, así como los militares separados del Ejército de El Líbano.
“Teníamos la decisión de izar la bandera de Daesh, declarar un emirato y jurar lealtad a Abu Bakr al-Baqdadi (actual cabecilla del EIIL), después de ocupar algunos pueblos y localidades en la parte norteña de El Líbano, en las que se sentía un vacío de seguridad”, ha revelado.
Además, agrega el cabecilla del EIIL, paralelamente a esas operaciones, la ciudad norteña de Trípoli y sus alrededores testificaban operaciones similares con el fin de facilitar la materialización de “nuestros grandes planes”.
De igual manera, Abu Hoda ha anunciado sus vínculos con parlamentarios libaneses como Jaled Al-Zaher, así como los sheijes salafistas como Kamal al-Bustani, entre otros; además de su habilidad en construir bombas y materiales explosivos.
Por medio de un comunicado emitido el pasado jueves, el Ejército de El Líbano informó el arresto de Abu Hoda y su hijo en un apartamento durante una redada en la región de Diniye, en el norte del país. Durante esa operación, las fuerzas de seguridad libanesas, también, incautaron armas, municiones y cinturones explosivos.
Miqati y su hijo están acusados de la decapitación de Ali Sayed, un militar libanés quien fue capturado junto con ocho soldados por los integrantes del EIIL y el Frente Al-Nusra, vinculado a Al-Qaeda, durante enfrentamientos a comienzos de agosto en la localidad fronteriza de Arsal, a 90 km de la ciudad capitalina de Beirut y sus alrededores, limítrofes con Siria.
El Líbano sufre desde 2011 actividades terroristas de una crueldad inusual, en relación con el conflicto que desde ese año enfrenta a Siria con fuerzas patrocinadas por distintos países occidentales y regionales, , encabezados por Estados Unidos, Arabia Saudí, Turquía y Catar.
El pasado mes de septiembre y en declaraciones al diario francés ‘Le Figaro’, el general y comandante del Ejército libanés, Jean Kahwaji, manifestó que las operaciones terroristas en su país buscan abrir una salida al mar, razón por la cual los terroristas buscan “unir los montes de Al-Qalamun a Arsal, y de ahí a la región de Akka (Acre, norte de los territorios ocupados palestinos)”.
A este respecto, el Movimiento de Resistencia Islámica de El Líbano (Hezbolá), junto al Ejército libanés, ha realizado operaciones contra los grupos armados extremistas en Siria, patrocinados desde el extranjero, con el objetivo de impedir la extensión del terrorismo a El Líbano.
http://www.hispantv.com/detail/2014/10/28/294624/detenido-lider-eiil-revela-complots-libano
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29778462
Detenido líder de EIIL revela complots contra El Líbano
Actualizado:
28/10/2014 10:24 GMT
Imprimir
El Tamaño del Texto:
25 2 Google +0 27 0
Ahmad Miqati, uno de los más altos dirigentes del grupo takfirí EIIL (Daesh, en árabe), ha desvelado que el objetivo principal de sus operaciones en El Líbano ha sido crear un “emirato de Daesh” en el norte libanés y, de esa manera, facilitar la anexión de la región siria de Al-Qalamun al mar Mediterráneo.
“La primera fase de nuestros programas consistía en anexar Al-Qalamun de Siria a la costa mediterránea a través de la región norteña de El Líbano (...) y teníamos previsto efectuarla dentro de un mes (debido a la necesidad del EIIL a un puerto)”, ha detallado Miqati, apodado Abu Hoda, tras su detención el pasado jueves por el Ejército libanés.
Según ha informado este martes la agencia iraní de noticias ‘IRNA’, pueblos como Bakhaoun, Aassoun, Sir Ed Donie, y Bqaa Safrin, incluían los planes de Abu Hoda destinados a crear una zona segura para el despliegue de los integrantes de Daesh, así como los militares separados del Ejército de El Líbano.
“Teníamos la decisión de izar la bandera de Daesh, declarar un emirato y jurar lealtad a Abu Bakr al-Baqdadi (actual cabecilla del EIIL), después de ocupar algunos pueblos y localidades en la parte norteña de El Líbano, en las que se sentía un vacío de seguridad”, ha revelado.
Además, agrega el cabecilla del EIIL, paralelamente a esas operaciones, la ciudad norteña de Trípoli y sus alrededores testificaban operaciones similares con el fin de facilitar la materialización de “nuestros grandes planes”.
De igual manera, Abu Hoda ha anunciado sus vínculos con parlamentarios libaneses como Jaled Al-Zaher, así como los sheijes salafistas como Kamal al-Bustani, entre otros; además de su habilidad en construir bombas y materiales explosivos.
Por medio de un comunicado emitido el pasado jueves, el Ejército de El Líbano informó el arresto de Abu Hoda y su hijo en un apartamento durante una redada en la región de Diniye, en el norte del país. Durante esa operación, las fuerzas de seguridad libanesas, también, incautaron armas, municiones y cinturones explosivos.
Miqati y su hijo están acusados de la decapitación de Ali Sayed, un militar libanés quien fue capturado junto con ocho soldados por los integrantes del EIIL y el Frente Al-Nusra, vinculado a Al-Qaeda, durante enfrentamientos a comienzos de agosto en la localidad fronteriza de Arsal, a 90 km de la ciudad capitalina de Beirut y sus alrededores, limítrofes con Siria.
El Líbano sufre desde 2011 actividades terroristas de una crueldad inusual, en relación con el conflicto que desde ese año enfrenta a Siria con fuerzas patrocinadas por distintos países occidentales y regionales, , encabezados por Estados Unidos, Arabia Saudí, Turquía y Catar.
El pasado mes de septiembre y en declaraciones al diario francés ‘Le Figaro’, el general y comandante del Ejército libanés, Jean Kahwaji, manifestó que las operaciones terroristas en su país buscan abrir una salida al mar, razón por la cual los terroristas buscan “unir los montes de Al-Qalamun a Arsal, y de ahí a la región de Akka (Acre, norte de los territorios ocupados palestinos)”.
A este respecto, el Movimiento de Resistencia Islámica de El Líbano (Hezbolá), junto al Ejército libanés, ha realizado operaciones contra los grupos armados extremistas en Siria, patrocinados desde el extranjero, con el objetivo de impedir la extensión del terrorismo a El Líbano.
http://www.hispantv.com/detail/2014/10/28/294624/detenido-lider-eiil-revela-complots-libano
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29778462
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,584
- Reaction score
- 26,300
a 20 de Octubre 2014 parece ser que ISIS tiene prácticamente ya Iraq y Siria:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-27838034
siguiente es el Líbano...
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-27838034
siguiente es el Líbano...
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,584
- Reaction score
- 26,300
¿qué tiene que ver esto con el hilo?
Escuchad a este señor:
min. 2.20
Y ahora mirad el mapa del cual habla Gen. Wesley Clark,
que los EEUU van a conquistar 7 países en 5 años:
1.Iraq,
2. Siria,
3. Lebanon,
4. Libia,
5. Somalia,
6. Sudan, y al final
7. Iran...
Escuchad a este señor:
min. 2.20
Y ahora mirad el mapa del cual habla Gen. Wesley Clark,
que los EEUU van a conquistar 7 países en 5 años:
1.Iraq,
2. Siria,
3. Lebanon,
4. Libia,
5. Somalia,
6. Sudan, y al final
7. Iran...
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,584
- Reaction score
- 26,300
Y ahora releed el hilo y veréis como las cosas se van solapando...
Un par de mapas de la zona para no perder la perspectiva:
...nota: recordad que en Yemen también va, desde hace un par de meses, un tipo de "primavera árabe" que conlleva a la instauración de nuevo UN-friendly premier ministro...
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29605621
poco falta para que todo el Oriente Medio "se vista de "violeta"
Un par de mapas de la zona para no perder la perspectiva:
...nota: recordad que en Yemen también va, desde hace un par de meses, un tipo de "primavera árabe" que conlleva a la instauración de nuevo UN-friendly premier ministro...
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29605621
poco falta para que todo el Oriente Medio "se vista de "violeta"
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,584
- Reaction score
- 26,300
¿qué tal os parecen los hechos?
...algo absurdo, ¿verdad?
...algo absurdo, ¿verdad?
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,584
- Reaction score
- 26,300
Algo off-topic pero en realidad plenamente en el tema:
America’s most famous Jewish journalist, Carl Bernstein (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Bernstein, Pulitzer para sus investigaciones sobre WaterGate), exposing the Jewish Neocon plot to plunge America into the insane war in Iraq.
"CARL BERNSTEIN: This was an insane war that brought us low economically, morally. We went to war against a guy who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. It was a total pretext! It's inexplicable and there you go to Cheney, there you go to Bush, there you go to the Jewish neo-cons who wanted to remake the world. Maybe I can say that because I'm Jewish. To bring about a certain result"
----
----
idéntico al testimonio de Gen Wesley Clark:
America’s most famous Jewish journalist, Carl Bernstein (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Bernstein, Pulitzer para sus investigaciones sobre WaterGate), exposing the Jewish Neocon plot to plunge America into the insane war in Iraq.
"CARL BERNSTEIN: This was an insane war that brought us low economically, morally. We went to war against a guy who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. It was a total pretext! It's inexplicable and there you go to Cheney, there you go to Bush, there you go to the Jewish neo-cons who wanted to remake the world. Maybe I can say that because I'm Jewish. To bring about a certain result"
----
----
idéntico al testimonio de Gen Wesley Clark:
