Operaciones de BANDERA FALSA

¿El tema te aburre?

  • sí.

    Votes: 4 12,5%
  • no.

    Votes: 23 71,9%
  • no me creo ni una palabra.

    Votes: 5 15,6%

  • Total voters
16 Mar 2013
Forman parte de nuestra vida y ni nos damos cuenta.

Pensaba que son un descubrimiento del s. XX, perfeccionados en los últimos 15 años...Nada mas lejos de la verdad...


Money Changers and the Great Fire of London in 1666

By JC Collins

“There is no proletarian, not even a Communist movement, that has not operated in the interests of money, and for the time being permitted by money – and that without the idealists among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact.”

- Oswald Spengler

The much utilized term “false flag” can mean a number of different things, from one sudden devastating event, to a slow burn series of events, and everything in between. In fact, the overall expansive proposition of the term is so broad that it is ineffective at conveying the overarching intent and methodology of the engineering that goes into the creation of such things.


For all the usage of the term “false flag” it is curious that very little has ever been written or investigated by the alternative media in regards to the Great Fire of London in the year 1666. But before we get into that event we shall step backwards in time a few more decades.

The first central bank was established by the Money Changers in Amsterdam, Netherlands, in the year 1609. From that base of operations the Money Changers began to wage a CSI war against the monarchies and people of Europe. The banking interests funded all forms of rebellion and agent provocateurs across the expanse of the continent with a special focus on England.

In 1642 the Money Changers began financing the agent Oliver Cromwell for the purpose of fomenting civil unrest and rebellion in England. By 1649 Cromwell had succeeded in purging Parliament of the supporters of King Charles I and the king was subsequently put to death.

From that point the Money Changers consolidated power further and forced England to become involved in costly wars which further indebted the government. One of these wars was the banker financed invasion of England by William of Orange from the Netherlands. Being that the Netherlands was where the first central bank was established by the Money Changers, it is not difficult to see where the money came from for the invasion – the time and labor of the Dutch disorganized masses.

William of Orange of course was successful and ascended to the English throne as King William III in 1689.

After more than 50 years of banker financed wars the English government finally succumbed to the methodologies of the Money Changers CSI pogroms and sanctioned the creation of the privately owned central bank which was misleadingly called the Bank of England.

Over the next 4 years the debt owed to the bankers by the English government increased by 1280%. This debt is likely still being paid by the time and labor of the disorganized masses of England. Our time and labor, being or wealth, is sum negative from the start because of fiat currency and is used to service the never ending debt of the Money Changers.

The time span from the creation of the first central bank in Amsterdam in 1609 to the creation of the Bank of England in 1694 can be considered to be one long string of CSI conditioning. To call any of these events a ‘false flag” does a severe disservice to the attempts of the disorganized masses to understand the machinations of the world we live in.

Returning to the Great Fire of London in 1666 we can consider this event to be a sudden “false flag” amongst the massive CSI conditioning which was taking place that century. But once again, the term does not relay the complexity of the planning which was required before the event itself and in the reorganization of the City of London which took place after.

Though the Money Changers had consolidated their power in England by 1649 it would still take continued CSI pogroms against the population in order to effect permanent changes to the social and geopolitical structure of the country. One of these pogroms was the intentional spreading of bubonic plague within the old Roman walls of the medieval City of London.

Like Ebola is being used today to spread death and fear of death in problematic areas of interest to the modern manifestation of the Money Changers, the plague was used in 1665 England to cause death and fear of death within the desired old Roman walls of medieval London.

The city at that time was extremely overpopulated and polluted. Though desired by the aristocracy for its symbolic history and esoteric location, it was also shunned because of the sociological cesspool which it had become. The economics of the city were intentionally degraded by the banking interests which made it easier to spread a well-known disease like the bubonic plague within the confines of the old Roman walls.

Disease along with the social and economic problems were overwhelming.

The Great Fire of London started on Sunday, September 2, 1666, within the Roman walls. Suspicion immediately set in as rumors of foreigners starting fires throughout the City of London circulated amongst the disorganized masses. Charles II, now fully in the control of the Money Changers, refused to help the citizens of London with the fire and over the next three days almost everything within the old Roman walls was gutted by the fire.

It is estimated that 13,200 homes and 87 parishes were destroyed by the fire, with 70,000 to 80,000 inhabitants left homeless. Only 6 deaths were recorded but it is likely that the death toll was extremely high as the deaths of the poor and middle class were not counted.

Also from this date, there were no additional cases of bubonic plague within the City of London or surrounding areas.

Like all “false flags” and CSI engineering, there was a patsy or place to shift blame. The French watchmaker Robert Hubert was arrested and it is recorded that he confessed to starting the fire within a bakery on Pudding Lane. It is written that Hubert said he was an agent of the Pope. But it came out at a later date that Hubert didn’t even arrive in the city until at least September 4, 2 days after the fire had started.

This taken with the fact that rumors of foreigners starting multiple fires throughout the city, even leading to the lynching of foreigners, strongly suggests that the fire was staged and played a vital role within a larger methodology of establishing a major banking center on the esoteric grounds of old medieval London.

The poor and middle class were pushed of their lands with little compensation. Though many plans for rebuilding the city were proposed the reconstruction was completed using the exact same street plan as was used before.

As mentioned above, it is curious that so many have avoided the connection between the Great Fire of London and the Money Changers, leading to the creation of the Bank of England in 1694. Given the importance of the City State status of the City of London, (there are 3 city states, being Vatican City, Washington DC, and the City of London, these are cities with their own laws and policing, separate from the countries in which they are located), it is worth investigating further to see how the old City of London before the fire was geographically located and how the current rebuilt banking City of London is geographically located.

Below is a map of the Great Fire of London which shows the pattern the fire took and which areas within the old Roman walls were gutted.

And now here is a map of modern day London, with the City of London clearly defined.

Based on the position of the Tower of London in the bottom right quadrant of the maps, it is clear to see the the city state of London, being the City of London, from which the international bankers have operated for centuries, was built on the remains of the old medieval City of London which had been located within the Roman walls which were built in the ancient world.

It has been the proposition of many astute researchers that the world is controlled from the three city states of Washington DC, Vatican City, and the City of London. I would agree with this conclusion, but we can now add a fourth pillar to the original three, which is the pillar of Confucianism, being the east as represented by China.

It was thought at one time that Japan could act as this fourth balancing pillar in the consolidation of world wide CSI mandates by the Money Changers, but that moment changed with the attempt by the Japanese to hide gold hoards from the bankers who financed the rise of their Empire leading up to World War 2.

China, for its part, has been controlled by the Money Changers since the English led Opium Wars against the Chinese disorganized masses. There were two Opium Wars, one in which spanned the years 1839 to 1842, and the second from 1856 to 1860. The intent was to flood the Chinese mainland with large amounts of opium in order to make the Chinese population docile and complacent to the hidden rule of the Money Changers. The same tactic is still used today in regards to both prescription drugs and street drugs, as well as alcohol, and all other forms of vice, be it gambling, shopping, or pornography.

China has been staged managed since that time and total control over the once-resistant population was fully realized with the establishment of communism during the revolution of 1949, after the population had been economically decimated and degraded by the Japanese invasion. The Chinese revolution followed the same textbook CSI methodology as the Bolshevik Revolution of Russia in 1917.

This is in fact the same CSI methodology which was used in the 1600’s against England.

The Money Changers are so close to realizing their Great Work of the Ages. This is the consolidation of all macroeconomics and sociological structures of humanity. The machinations of this move towards a multilateral financial system with the SDR acting as the super-sovereign reserve currency have been well covered on this site.

The same so-called “conspiracy and freedom sites” which promote the simplified version of the “false flag” term also push a false hope on a relatively small percentage of humanity. Contrary to the beliefs of some, there has only ever been, and will only continue to be, a small and marginal segment of the disorganized masses which has the potential to awaken to the CSI machinations of the Money Changers.

Or so it would appear at the time of this writing.

To ensure that this marginal segment does not grow in size it is further engineered as a controlled opposition which promotes both factual conspiracy theories and absurd conspiracy theories. I have discussed before how something called “the weapons of the weak”, being gossip within the disorganized masses, has been stage managed to materialize in society as conspiracy theories.

To discern which sites, personalities, and organizations are a part of this CSI engineering is not easy. But one can attempt to clear the mine field by sticking to facts as much as possible and studying the occult mandates of the Money Changers.

Jay Dyer over at the Jay Analysis website has been working hard since 2010 to decipher and catalog as much of this occult symbolism and “revelation of the method” as can be expected from any human being. Jay recently compiled a post titled “V for Vendetta: Managed Dialectics. In the essay he postulates that the movie V for Vendetta was an attempt to engineer an anti-establishment revolution by using the methodologies of managed dialectics.

From this managed dialectics came the imagery and symbolism which is used by the group Anonymous. I would highly encourage readers to spend some time on Jay’s site reading his material and building their own conclusions on what is actually happening in the world of website conspiracy.

The mandates of the Money Changers has been consolidated within the institution known as the Bank for International Settlements. Many assume that this “central bank for central banks” is controlled by the House of Rothschild. This is an obvious conclusion but erroneous.

To understand what I mean one must consider how the House of Rothschild came to be. It is recognized that the Rothschild empire came out of nowhere. Along those lines it is interesting to consider that in 1760, 66 years after the establishment of the Bank of England, and 151 years after the establishment of the worlds first central bank in Amsterdam, a man by the name of Mayor Amschel Bauer suddenly changed his family name to Rothschild, meaning Red Shield, and started the House of Rothschild, from which he sent his 5 sons out into the capitals of Europe to set up additional central banks. The story has all the hallmarks of a symbolic mystery play. Readers should watch the 1936 movie titled The House of Rothschild.

The coat of arms of the City of London contains a red shield, or red Templar cross. There is additional information and evidence available to the curious researcher to make solid connections between the Money Changers, Templars, and Rothschilds. It is obvious that the Money Changers of the ancient world, the ones who Julius Caesar and Jesus Christ spoke out against, have hidden themselves behind the veneer of fronts like the House of Rothschild, while they have consolidated control over the wealth, time and labor, of humanity through a process of establishing central banks and implementing taxation on labor.

On November 1, 1996, the following financial institutions became shareholding members of the Bank for International Settlements:

The People’s Bank of China, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Reserve Bank of India, the Bank of Mexico, the Central Bank of the Russia Federation, the Saudi Arabia Monetary Agency, and the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

All central banks around the world, following the mandates of the Bank for International Settlements, have been implementing a process by which they become compliant with the Basel 3 Banking Regulations on Liquidity. This also includes the People’s Bank of China and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

There will be no overthrow of the Money Changers as envisioned and promoted by the “absurd conspiracy theories” of the controlled opposition of the disorganized masses. Anyone who believes this is being lead astray by those whom they entrust with being sources of truthful knowledge.

The CSI, or Cultural and Socioeconomic Interception methodology of the Money Changers is broader in scope and definition than most conspiracy theories would suggest. We are witnessing the same machinations of war, civil unrest, revolution, debt, and disease today that the populations were subjected too back in the 17th Century. The reluctance of the masses, especially the marginally awakened segment of the population, to grasp the complexity and engineering behind what is actually taking place is disheartening. But we continue to push forward and bring awareness to those who are willing to accept the obvious nature of the world. – JC
Última edición:
19 Feb 2010
Claro que forman parte de nuestra realidad, aunque haya mucha gente que no lo sepa.

Supongo que siempre ha sido asì. Seguramente, es màs viejo que el mundo. Seguramente, ya en las guerras pùnicas, romanos disfrazados de cartagineses, o viceversa, iban a incendiar el campamento, para que luego se les echase la culpa a los contrarios...y asì, hasta ahora.

Sòlo que ahora tienen una resonancia que habrìa sido impensable hasta hace poco. Ahora, con el tam-tam ensordecedor de los mass media, se machaca y bombardea con la versiòn "oficial" de la "verdad"...hasta que consiguen que todo el mundo la crea. Antes, por ejemplo en el s. II antes de Cristo, no habìa mass media...si un campamento romano era incendiado, digamos, supuestamente, por los cartagineses, siempre habrìa alguien que podìa decir que era muy improbable que los cartagineses se hubieran acercado tanto, o que uno de los supuestos incendiarios cartagineses tenìa toda la pinta de ser romano...y quizà la gente podìa sospechar que las cosas no eran como parecìan....pero ahora, sòlo hablan los mass media, la ùnica versiòn de las cosas es la de los mass media, y quien osa decir algo en contra es ridiculizado, ninguneado o silenciado. O hecho pasar por pirado,loco,conspiracionista o antisistema.

Volviendo a los antiguos romanos, quizà deberìamos plantearnos, ante muchos de estos supuestos atentados, la vieja pregunta: qui prodest? (a quien le aprovecha?) Quien saca provecho de estos atentados, al final? quien gana algo con ellos?....ya los romanos, hace dos mil anyos, decìan que preguntarse esto era la clave para entender de dònde vienen las cosas.
16 Mar 2013
Incorporo este post al presente hilo para que quede todo en el mismo sitio...

muy interesante...
gracias, @pato laqueado !

"pato laqueado, post: 2747422, member: 5606"]Ataques de “bandera falsa”: pasado, presente ¿…y futuro?
Publicado: 29 sep 2014 | 16:54 GMT

  • Adrian Salbuchi

    analista y autor

    Quienes creen en “teorías conspirativas” les encanta el concepto de ataques de “Banderas Falsas”: o sea, la idea de que cuando una nación – usualmente muy poderosa – necesita una excusa para hacerle la guerra a otra nación – usualmente algún adversario más débil - se las arregla para orquestar un “ataque” contra sí misma para luego culpar a esta otra nación, usándolo como excusa para atacarla.

    Desde luego que esto no es tan simple y puede sonar como una locura; sin embargo, como le dijera Polonio a Hamlet “Aunque parezca una locura, sin embargo tiene cierto método y coherencia…”

    ¿Entonces, hay algo de cierto detrás de tales maniobras que hace que tantas personas crean que conforman una explicación plausible de muchas cosas insólitas que hoy ocurren en este loco mundo?

    Cuando los historiadores repasan los hechos de las últimas décadas y siglos, muchos eventos clave que han generado guerras mundiales, conflictos regionales, y convulsiones políticas resultan difíciles de explicar si sólo los percibimos como acontecimientos “espontáneos”, resultado de penosos “errores” cometidos por políticos, o de la estupidez de las masas o, simplemente, de la “mala suerte”. Desde luego que muchas veces los hombres se comportan tontamente pero "la culpa no la hallaremos en nuestras estrellas sino en nosotros mismos” observó alguna vez el noble Casio.

    Sin embargo, personas más esclarecidas van comprendiendo que los niveles máximos del poder mundial – o sea, aquellos grupos muy pequeños, poderosos y altamente consistentes y coordinados en distintas partes del mundo que operan dentro de una red de dinero, influencias y presiones en el escenario mundial – tienen demasiados intereses y metas en común como para quedarse como meros observadores del devenir mundial dejando que “las cosas ocurran por sí mismas”.

    Pues las cosas no son tanto el resultado de las acciones - buenas y malas - de las mayorías de los pueblos, sino más bien el resultado del planeamiento, maniobras y direccionamiento cuidadoso realizado por esas pequeñas minorías disciplinadas. Ellas son quienes disparan episodios trascendentes – guerras, revoluciones, invasiones, asesinatos, “liberaciones” nacionales – que luego son adecuadamente presentados ante los pueblos para que las adopten como sus propias causas: como sus guerras, sus revoluciones y sus invasiones…. Pero, ¿hay algo más detrás de todo esto?

    El pasado…
    Muchos creen que ciertos eventos “bisagra” de nuestra historia fueron ingenierizados como “banderas falsas”: el hundimiento del acorazado norteamericano “USS Maine” en la bahía de La Habana en 1898 que llevó a la guerra con España y dio nacimiento al Imperio Norteamericano; el previsible hundimiento del vapor de pasajeros “Lusitania” en 1917 que transportaba pertrechos de Guerra a los británicos y arrastró a EE.UU. a la primera guerra mundial; el incendio del Reichstag en Berlín en 1933 que permitió anular a la oposición política; el ataque japonés a la base naval de Pearl Harbor en 1941 que dio al presidente Franklin Roosevelt la excusa perfecta para hacerle la guerra a Alemania y el Japón; el “incidente” del Golfo de Tonkín que en 1964 permitió a EE.UU. escalar la Guerra de Vietnam…

    Muchos historiadores creen que estos episodios fueron preparados a propósito para que sirvan de excusas para la guerra y obtener réditos políticos.

    Una cosa es verdad: todos esos hechos cambiaron al mundo de una manera dramática. No que todos los episodios de Bandera Falsa siempre salgan bien pues algunos fracasaron. Por ejemplo, en 1967 durante la Guerra de los Seis Días entre Israel y sus vecinos árabes, cazabombarderos israelíes camuflados atacaron al buque norteamericano “USS Liberty” que navegaba las aguas del Mediterráneo tratando de hundirlo para poder culpar a Gamal Nasser de Egipto y así arrastrar a EE.UU. en esa guerra del lado israelí. Mas el “USS Liberty” no pudo ser hundido a pesar de que los ataques mataron a 34 marineros…

    Y por supuesto, la “Madre de todas las Banderas Falsas” quizás sean los ataques del 11 de septiembre de 2001 contra la Torres Gemelas y el Pentágono. Trece años después millones de personas van tomando conciencia de que existen preguntas imposibles de contestar, entre ellas la más grave: ¿Por qué la Torre No. 7, un rascacielos de 47 pisos que no fue impactada por ninguna aeronave, sin embargo colapsó en forma perfectamente vertical a velocidad de caída libre?


    Ninguno de los multimedios o gobiernos occidentales admitirán jamás que los ataques de Falsa Bandera existen.

    Sin embargo - igual que las proverbiales brujas en las que nadie cree - que existen, existen! ¿De qué se trata entonces? ¿Hemos de considerar a los ”escenarios de banderas falsas” como una manera de comprender algunos asuntos mundiales de alta complejidad? ¿Pueden ayudarnos a identificar mejor ciertos “trucos sucios” que nos juegan los máximos estamentos decisorios del poder mundial?

    Preguntas fundamentales:

    1. Por qué y para qué…: Cada vez que observamos eventos cuidadosamente planificados de muy alto perfil y enorme impacto que inmediatamente justifican acciones de guerra contra algún “enemigo pre-elegido” – se trate de algún “estado transgresor”, o la “guerra global contra el terrorismo”, o algún “día que quedará en la infamia” – debemos siempre hacernos dos preguntas clave: (1) ¿a quiénes beneficia?, y (2) sigamos el camino del dinero… Tampoco hemos de ser simplistas y creer que ataques de bandera falsa forman parte del planeamiento oficial de ningún gobierno.

    Quizás esto pudo ser así hace 70 o 100 años, pero hoy no. … El desafío es identificar a operadores más discretos: planificadores de elites muy efectivos, flexibles, bien financiados, capacitados y protegidos que se encuentran enquistados muy profundamente dentro de las estructuras de poder públicas y privadas de las naciones. No sólo operan desde dentro de los gobiernos, sino también desde empresas contratistas, bancos de cerebros, multimedios, universidades y servicios de inteligencia locales y extranjeros, entre otros. Conforman una nutrida red cuyas raíces ocultas podrán incluir grupos abiertamente ilegales: mafias, barones del tráfico de armas y de la droga, y grupos terroristas y guerrilleros. Se trata, en verdad, de una red de compleja ingenierizacion conformada por nivel sobre nivel de organizaciones, protagonistas y elementos legales, semi-legales y abiertamente ilegales.

    Como una cebolla, a medida que se levanta una cáscara, aparece otra hasta que al final no queda nada… De ahí la importancia que tiene para ellos erigir muros de contención correctamente ensamblados, para que cada actor desempeñe el rol que le corresponde sólo “sabiendo lo que necesita saber” para desempeñarlo.

    A veces hasta se “pelean entre sí” igual como lo hacen los actores de una obra de teatro: podremos ver a un obsesionado príncipe Hamlet “matar” al rey Claudio, mas una vez terminada la obra ambos actores podrán relajarse e ir juntos a tomar una cerveza en el bar de la esquina…

    Pues sólo se trata de una obra en la que, “todo el mundo es el escenario y los hombre apenas actores en el mismo. Así, mientras que el 11 de septiembre, George W Bush estaba ocupado declarándole la “Guerra Global contra el Terrorismo” llena de odio y venganza a Osama Bin Laden y su pandilla de malhechores, un día antes su papa George H W Bush se reunía con sus socios Bin Laden en el Hotel Four Seasons de Washington DC participando de una junta corporativa de The Carlyle Group. Los negocios siempre serán negocios…

    2. Tecnología: A medida que la tecnología progresa, los eventos de bandera falsa se tornaron más y más sofisticados y complejos, y su planeamiento y ejecución llegaron a ser casi perfectos.

    Todo el mundo experimentó el shock y terror de ver a las Torres Gemelas volar por los aires como si se les hubieran colocado cargas mini-nucleares y explosivas de demolición controlada dentro de ambos colosos de acero y hormigón que las hicieron colapsar a velocidad de caída libre, transformándose en polvo de nano-termita! Hollywood no hubiera podido hacer un thriller de “infierno en la torre” de semejante dramatismo como los videos reales de aquél fatídico día.

    Pero esos videos rápidamente se transformaron en una espada de doble filo al mostrar a plena luz del día muchísimas incongruencias imposibles de explicar. ¿Por qué ambas torres colapsaron tan repentina y catastróficamente? ¿Por qué se encontró un agujero tan pequeño en el Pentágono a través del cual sólo un Boeing 757 “liquido” hubiera podido escurrirse? ¿Cómo diablos hizo el dueño del World Trade Center, Larry Silverstein, para lograr que la Torre No. 7 de 47 pisos colapsara en forma perfectamente vertical apenas una hora luego que él mismo declaró que decidió ”tirarla abajo”? Efectivamente…Demasiadas preguntas imposibles de responder! En fin... Ya pasaron aquellos viejos tiempos en los que no había ni fotografías ni películas de episodios de bandera falsa, sino tan solo los reportajes periodísticos de los grandes medios Hearst y el “New York Times”, que eran luego repetidos por todo el mundo en disciplinada alineación informativa.

    Hasta la famosa bala mágica que mató al presidente Kennedy sólo se hizo famosa porque la mala (buena) suerte quiso que aquél soleado día de noviembre de 1963 en Dallas, el ciudadano Abraham Zapruder se acercara a la Plaza Dealy a filmar a su presidente con su cámara Super-8! Pero las imágenes de entonces eran borrosas, poco claras,granuladas… Hoy el público está mucho más alerta. Hace muchas más preguntas y busca explicaciones “alternativas”. Cada vez más gente duda que los señores que ocupan la Casa Blanca, el Pentágono, el Departamento de Estado, Downing Street, Palais D’Elysée, la CIA, MI6, y Mossad nos estén diciendo la verdad…

    3. Consumir antes del… Hace 50 o 100 años atrás, un evento de bandera falsa bien planeado y ejecutado tenía una duración políticamente de muchas décadas, logrando posicionarse cómodamente en los libros de historia por largos años.

    Igual que una botella de buen vino, se los podía guardar en los sótanos de la historia durante muchas décadas sin temor a que se echaran a perder; todo lo contrario, igual que el vino con el pasar del tiempo se ponían mejor. Sin embargo, las banderas falsas de nuestros tiempos - infinitamente más complejos, osados y peligrosos – pareciera tener una “vida útil” cada vez más corta.

    Ya no se parecen a un buen vino, sino más como a un yogurt que debemos consumir rápidamente antes que se eche a perder. Existe cierta lógica detrás de los eventos de bandera falsa; tanto los viejos como lo nuevos. Quienes los llevan a cabo saben que, a la larga, los historiadores e investigadores del futuro probablemente terminen descubriendo parte o toda la verdad detrás de ellos. Pues ninguna operación de altísimo perfil y trascendencia podrá falsificarse para siempre.

    La clave del “éxito” para ellos está en que ese plazo “a la larga”, sea realmente extenso: dentro de 80, 100, 120 años en el futuro, pues entonces cuando se descubre la verdad en tan lejano futuro, ya no tendrá consecuencias políticas sino que será un mero “dato histórico”; incluso anecdótico. ¿Qué importa hoy si se comprueba que, efectivamente, buzos tácticos norteamericanos volaron el acorazado “USS Maine” en la bahía de La Habana en 1898? ¿A quién le puede importar? ¿Acaso España invadirá La Florida si esta noticia se da a conocer hoy? ¿Qué importa si el Imperio alemán tenía razón, después de todo, en considerar al “Lusitania” como un blanco de guerra legítimo en 1917? ¿A quién le puede importar?

    Si mientras tanto Alemania perdió no una, sino dos guerras mundiales… Sin embargo, si hoy se conociera la verdad oculta detrás de los ataques del 11 de septiembre, eso representaría un disparo al propio corazón de la estructura de poder que hoy controla a EE.UU.: a los Neo-Conservadores de Bush por haber permitido, encubierto y mentido acerca de lo que realmente ocurrió; a la administración Obama por haber mirado para otro lado, a toda la dirigencia política norteamericana y la de sus aliados de aquellos años: los Tony Blair, José Aznar, Silvio Berlusconi, sheiks árabes, y todos los que acompañaron y participaron en aquella vil canallada, se encontrarían en muy serias dificultades…

    En verdad, una revelación de esta naturaleza haría que la credibilidad de los gobiernos occidentales, sus medios de prensa y entorno académico sufran un colapso catastrófico a nivel mundial.

    ¿Y el futuro?

    Puede que el lector se pregunte para qué nos ocupamos de este tema. La respuesta es simple: porque hoy existen muchos indicios de que podría estar preparándose otro mega-atentado de bandera falsa en estos precisos momentos. Uno tan horrendo, enorme e inimaginable que permitiría a las estructuras de poder enquistadas dentro de EE.UU., Reino Unido, Unión Europea e Israel hacerle la guerra a todos sus enemigos globales al mismo tiempo y durante muchos años: el mundo musulmán, Rusia, China y sus aliados, junto con todo otro país que tenga la osadía de mantenerse neutral en esa venidera tercera guerra mundial.
    Sería un mundo en el que no habría lugar para quienes no piensen que EE.UU., Reino Unido, Unión Europa e Israel no son los “buenos” de la película… Como dijera George W Bush tan elocuentemente al poco tiempo de los ataque del 2001, “cada país debe tomar una decisión: o están con nosotros o están contra nosotros”.

    ¿Y quiénes serán los “culpables” oficiales de semejante episodio? Pues ya está ampliamente pre-anunciado: el “Estado Islámico” con el apoyo de Irán, Siria, Rusia, apoyados por China… Bueno, usted podrá imaginarse todo el cuento… Esta es la gran encrucijada en la que hoy se encuentra la humanidad: quienes manejan el mundo exigen que todos adoptemos su visión del mundo simplista y binaria que divide todo en “buenos y malos”, “blanco o negro”, dónde ellos son siempre los únicos “buenos”.

    Quizás hoy estemos al borde del momento más trascendente de la historia humana; que estemos ante el Ser o No Ser del Hombre… Nos guste o no, quizás pronto todos debamos enfrentarnos a esa terrible cuestión. De manera que más vale que vayamos ordenando nuestras ideas, mirando bien al mundo que nos circunda, entendiendo quién es quién, y abriendo bien los ojos y el entendimiento.

    Hoy más que nunca es tiempo de pensar con nuestro propio cerebro y no con el del Enemigo. Medítelo y piense bien qué va a hacer…

    Adrian Salbuchi para RT
    Adrian Salbuchi es analista político, autor, conductor del programa de televisión “Segunda República” por el Canal TLV1 de Argentina. Fundador del Proyecto Segunda República (PSR). www.proyectosegundarepublica.com

    Texto completo en: http://actualidad.rt.com/expertos/salbuchi/view/141786-ataques-bandera-falsa-pasado-presente-futuro
16 Mar 2013
La otra cara de la moneda de las operaciones falsas son las llamadas (por el mainstream - media, políticos, etc) "teorías de conspiración".

A mí personalmente el significado de tal epíteto me "da aires de" esto:


...jaja...hace no mucho D. Cameron declaró que cualquiera que se hace preguntas sobre la versión oficial de ciertos hechos y propone versión alternativa se tiene que igualar a "terrorista" por alentar doctrina anti-estatal...


30 Nov 2014
En cuanto la opnión pública se pone contra los terroristas y los que actún contra la CIVILIZACIÓN occidental
surgen teorías fantasiosas.
El que mata personas y libertades es el malo.
Los que cuestionan nuestros derechos y defienden a quienes pretenden destruirlos se convierten en cómplices involuntarios...o muy conacientes...
16 Mar 2013
25 Mar 2010
La llamada Guerra de cuarta generación es una denominación dentro de la doctrina militar que comprende estrategias no convencionales de combate como la Guerra de Guerrillas, Guerra asimétrica, Guerra de Baja Intensidad, la Guerra Sucia, el Terrorismo de Estado, Tácticas Asimétricas Irregulares con el objetivo de desestabilizar u operaciones similares y encubiertas, haciendo uso de la propaganda, la cibernética para dirigir a la sociedad civil y la política. En este tipo de guerras no hay enfrentamiento entre ejércitos convencionales ni necesariamente entre Estados, sino entre grupos de intereses de cualquier naturaleza, económica, política, religiosa, étnica etc
26 Ago 2013
42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks
Posted on February 9, 2015 by WashingtonsBlog
Painting by Anthony Freda

Governments from Around the World Admit They Do It
There are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.

In the following 42 instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admits to it, either orally or in writing:

(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasionsadmitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.

(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.

(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goeringadmitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev alladmit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and falsely blame it on the Nazis.

(6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and seethis, this and this).

(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.

(11) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.

(12) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.

(13) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

(14) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

(15) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

(16) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

(17) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

(18) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(19) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.

(20) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

(21) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

(22) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

(23) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).

(24) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.

(25) Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).

(26) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

(27) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.

(28) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.

(29) Senior police officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that – in July 2001, at the G8 summit in Genoa – planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer, in order to justify aviolent crackdown against protesters.

(30) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

(31) Similarly, the U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by amemo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction (despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers).

(32) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

(33) United Press International reported in June 2005:

U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

(34) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

(35) Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).

(36) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.

(37) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.

(38) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.

(39) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.

(40) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

(41) The former Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others.

(42) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.

In addition, two-thirds of the City of Rome burned down in a huge fire on July 19, 64 A.D. The Roman people blamed the Emperor Nero for starting the fire. Some top Roman leaders – including the Roman consul Cassius Dio, as well as historians like Suetonius – agreed that Nero started the fire (based largely on the fact that the Roman Senate had just rejected Nero’s application to clear 300 acres in Rome so that he could build a palatial complex, and that the fire allowed him to build his complex). Regardless of who actually started the fire, Nero – in the face of public opinion accusing him of arson –falsely blamed theChristians for starting the fire. He then rounded up and brutally tortured and murdered scores of Christians for something they likely didn’t do.

We didn’t include this in the list above, because – if Nero did start the fire on purpose – he did it for hisown reasons (to build his palatial complex), and not for geopolitical reasons benefiting his nation.

So Common … There’s a Name for It
The use of the bully’s trick is so common that it was given a name hundreds of years ago.

“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.

The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.

Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.

Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags
Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:

“A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! “In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin

Share this:

This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Mar 2013
50 casos documentados de operaciones de bandera falsa (= actos de terrorismo perpetrados por instituciones gubernamentales) desde los años 30 del s. XX


La función de las operaciones de bandera falsa es culpar al enemigo político por un acto de terror perpetuado a propósito por la misma parte (país, institución gubernamental) para obtener el apoyo de la opinión pública en adoptar medidas drásticas contra ese enemigo político que de otra forma hubieran sido impopulares.

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler
16 Mar 2013
Lo de Grecia sigue la línea de acontecimientos de muchos otros países: Iran, Guatemala, Ecuador, Panama, etc. etc...
Las multinacionales con su brazo ejecutivo haciendo todo tipo de golpes de efecto: subversión, golpes de estado, accidentes aéreos de presidentes, etc. etc...Todo para que los recursos naturales del país no se vayan al pueblo, que pueda así tener un desarrollo justo, sino que terminen en las manos de los "salvadores bondadosos de los países en dificultad"

Confessions of an economic hitman

"I'm uploading this in connection with the financial crisis in Greece and Europe. Many North Europeans think Greece and Europe is in crisis because the Greeks lived more luxarious that they could afford."
5 Mar 2012
Lo de Grecia sigue la línea de acontecimientos de muchos otros países: Iran, Guatemala, Ecuador, Panama, etc. etc...
Las multinacionales con su brazo ejecutivo haciendo todo tipo de golpes de efecto: subversión, golpes de estado, accidentes aéreos de presidentes, etc. etc...Todo para que los recursos naturales del país no se vayan al pueblo, que pueda así tener un desarrollo justo, sino que terminen en las manos de los "salvadores bondadosos de los países en dificultad"

Confessions of an economic hitman

"I'm uploading this in connection with the financial crisis in Greece and Europe. Many North Europeans think Greece and Europe is in crisis because the Greeks lived more luxarious that they could afford."

Ahora los griegos son los conejitos de indias.... repiten lo que paso en Argentina con el corralito