Se pudo haber hecho a un lado para dejar pasar a Kate, ni que el pasillo estuviera tan estrecho. Saludos!!!
Duques de Sussex: Opiniones en su contra.
- Autormajo
- Fecha de inicio
Se pudo haber hecho a un lado para dejar pasar a Kate, ni que el pasillo estuviera tan estrecho. Saludos!!!
No debe hacerse, es totalmente anti protocolar e informal.
No puedo estar de acuerdo. Meghan está más hinchada y grande ahora que de embarazada,, lo que ya empieza a ser sospechoso de que está teniendo algun problema hormonal post parto o que se está comiendo hasta las patas de las mesas. Y Kate está delgada. Como siempre lo está excepto, claro, en los embarazos.
Última edición:
Gracias!!!
Yo pensaba eso, que el parto le provocó un desbalance hormonal, porque al menos hasta un mes antes del parto no se vió tan voluminosa. Pero sí fue rara su barriga. Muy temprano en el embarazo crecía y se encogía.
- Registrado
- 18 May 2018
- Mensajes
- 984
- Calificaciones
- 6.614
no s
e porque me da que tiene depresión postparto...
Si, lo de la barriga de Meghan siempre será un total misterio, un día parecía a punto de parir y al siguiente que ni estaba embarazada. Y siempre tan apretada, ceñida, con las costuras a punto de reventar. Muy Kardashian todo el embarazo . Y ahora? está no gorda, está hinchada,como inflada...va a ser un post parto largo y lento....
- Registrado
- 18 May 2018
- Mensajes
- 984
- Calificaciones
- 6.614
a mi me parece q a una le sobran unos kilitos, los que le falta a la otra! jajajaja Pero opino que mucho mejor una mujer como MM q como Kate
Deben ser datos y consideraciones muy interesantes sobre el tema pero.... y las personas que no dominamos el idioma inglés?JULY 9, 2019A BOFFIN
The Secret Sussex Christening
The awkward wedding photo of Harry and MM in May 2018 has been surpassed by the christening photo of a child named Archie Harrison (taken by Chris Allerton their ‘go to’ photographer), where all but MM look a little uncomfortable. There were some well rehearsed smiles, mingled with a cross between a grimace and an attempt to look happy. Last year we witnessed a wedding with no carpet, and the bride with only one family member as a guest. It comes as no surprise that the Sussex duo wanted the christening to be private, releasing details as and when they wished. To be frank, many are past caring and while being a godparent is considered important, to most it’s a token gesture these days as it is revealed the godparents for the child known as Archie will never be released.
The ceremony was held in the private chapel at Windsor Castle on 6 July, 2019 at 11 a.m., and lasted less than an hour, with about 25 guests present. Most reporters didn’t bother trekking down to Windsor and were content to boast on social media they were doing things that they enjoyed on a rare sunny Saturday. The Queen had already said she would not attend due to prior commitments, and the Archbishop of Canterbury was also busy in York, but apparently he was helicoptered in to perform the ceremony and back again (215 miles each way). Some would ask who exactly funded that journey (as it’s supposed to be private) and the hypocrisy of the Sussex declaration of being as green as possible with their environmental rhetoric. Was it really necessary to spend resources on a ceremony that lasted barely an hour?
One reporter announced the probable identity of one of the godparents as Charlie van Straubenzee, and was attacked on social media for not giving the Sussex duo their privacy, but do people really care who the godparents are, or are they annoyed at the demands for privacy? The fact is if the child becomes 6th in line to the throne at any given time, then they will be considered a public figure, and thus hiding all the information from the public was futile (such as which doctors delivered the child and who the godparents are).
Here is a much happier photo of Harry’s christening with all his godparents, who perhaps he should be turning to for some advice? Harry’s godparents:
- Lady Sarah Chatto (Armstong-Jones)
- Gerald Ward (deceased)
- Prince Andrew
- Carolyn Bartholomew
- Lady Celia Vestey
- Bryan Organ
Prince Harry’s christening photo in 1984 complete with godparents.
Only a few days before the christening, MM turned up at Wimbledon with two old college pals in tow (Genevieve Hillis and Lindsay Roth Jordan), where one can only describe it as a grotesque and blatant display of faux self-importance. Jordan lives in London, now married to a Brit, and Hillis must have flown in from the US for the weekend one assumes. The RPO asked a couple of spectators to refrain from taking photos of MM as she was there in a private capacity, but they actually weren’t; one was taking photos of the tennis, and another took a selfie of themselves with the court in the background. How utterly embarrassing for the RPO, because no one was actually interested in taking her photo, and some didn’t even know who she was. If there ever was a sense of exaggerated self-importance, it was displayed here. When you are a public figure in a public place and event, you can’t control who takes photos of you, but in this case people were more interested in the tennis! If she was trying to keep the identity of potential godparents a secret, then why display yourself publicly with two friends?
To add to the drama, the friends prompted MM when the cameras were on her, desperately trying to talk without opening their mouths, but failing oh so miserably. It reminds me of scenes when sports fans suddenly see themselves on camera and they tidy up their hair, straighten themselves up and smile! Hillis spots the camera and tries to whisper to MM to put on her hat as the camera is pointing their way, but you can see Hillis turn to her and her eyes through her sunglasses catch the camera. MM fumbles with her hat and out of the blue puts it on although it doesn’t fit well, and adjusts her hair. Jordan then tries to whisper to her to smile, and the both do a simultaneous fake smile that lasts a second. All I can say is that I have seen better on amateur nights in clubs.
The christening yielded two photos, a now typically pretentious black and white image and a family photo where you can imagine the photographer yelling, ‘cheese’ where people are holding their smiles as best as they can. Many questions have arisen from this, so take a look and decide for yourself:
- Why wasn’t Charles Spencer there with his sisters?
- Why hasn’t anyone seen Doria leave or enter the UK again? We saw her arrive for the wedding and the ‘book launch’ and it wasn’t as if this was a secret. Even if private airports were used, photographers would see her leaving her home in LA, yet somehow either they are interested in her, or they have been paid off. Surely Coleman-Rayner could make a few pennies from a photo of Doria leaving LA?
- Was the Archbishop of Canterbury in attendance when he was scheduled to be in York? Did he arrive by helicopter at great expense?
Sería posible que quien postea estos artículos nos haga un resumen del contenido en español?
Personalmente ni me entero de nada de lo que allí dice!!!!
Gracias
- Registrado
- 12 Nov 2014
- Mensajes
- 11.111
- Calificaciones
- 43.801
La foto de espaldas es demoledora...
Estar sana y delgada es "violencia contra la mujer"? Kate es una mujer de complexión atlética, ni está enferma ni ejerce "violencia" contra nadie por el mero hecho de que su culo quepa en una silla sin rebosar. Y Meghan no está "gorda", está de post parto.
en qué sentido seria mejor Mehgan que Kate? solo por tener más kilos? pregunta seria.
