- Registrado
- 4 Abr 2016
- Mensajes
- 11.554
- Calificaciones
- 24.868
LOL
Juicio al 'procés' - Referéndum en Cataluña — El conflicto catalán
- AutorAl loro
- Fecha de inicio
- Estado
Es absurdo, o solo están para llevar la contraria o es que no entienden nada de nada. No sé qué opción me preocupa más.
- Registrado
- 17 Ago 2017
- Mensajes
- 5.686
- Calificaciones
- 40.662
Remodelación del partido "Chupitos por las bragas", cuya abreviatura es CxB, queda, de momento, configurado como sigue:
Presidenta de Honor: @paula elisa
Presidenta: @MissCaroline
Vicepresidenta: @Galadriel87
Tesorera@MMarina
Vocal de Justicia: @paulino
Relaciones Públicas@Maria Sestieri
Relaciones Exteriores: @Neusi73, @Soberana Bonbon
Portavoz @Lee, adjunta a la portavocía @SultanaXS
Embajadora: @pato laqueado, y adjunta a la embajadora @Prisca
Educación: @Lemon&orange
Defensa: @MeganM[/QUOTE]
Protocolo (pendiente de aceptación): @Misaki
@Merlucilla. representante del partido en Waterloo[/QUOTE]
Buscamos representante en Alemania.
Propongo a @Ave fenix como adjunta a Relaciones Públicas, adjunta a la Postavocía o como nuestra representante en Alemania. Lo que ella prefiera. También me parece bien que se invente el cargo.
En Chupitos por las Bragas cabemos tod@as
Mucho ánimo que me parece que nos vamos de campaña electoral!!!
Presidenta de Honor: @paula elisa
Presidenta: @MissCaroline
Vicepresidenta: @Galadriel87
Tesorera@MMarina
Vocal de Justicia: @paulino
Relaciones Públicas@Maria Sestieri
Relaciones Exteriores: @Neusi73, @Soberana Bonbon
Portavoz @Lee, adjunta a la portavocía @SultanaXS
Embajadora: @pato laqueado, y adjunta a la embajadora @Prisca
Educación: @Lemon&orange
Defensa: @MeganM[/QUOTE]
Protocolo (pendiente de aceptación): @Misaki
@Merlucilla. representante del partido en Waterloo[/QUOTE]
Buscamos representante en Alemania.
Propongo a @Ave fenix como adjunta a Relaciones Públicas, adjunta a la Postavocía o como nuestra representante en Alemania. Lo que ella prefiera. También me parece bien que se invente el cargo.
En Chupitos por las Bragas cabemos tod@as
Mucho ánimo que me parece que nos vamos de campaña electoral!!!
Coñe, está en custodia continuada en la cárcel para que no le pase nada ( se están midiendo en que esté bien en todo momento), pero en prisión preventiva...
- Registrado
- 28 Dic 2017
- Mensajes
- 200
- Calificaciones
- 1.279
@Ondina
Esto realmente no es demasiado off-topic. Los separatistas no desean un pais soberano de verdad, sino lo que otros han llamado un catalan open-space, poblado por gente liquida, entregado a entes financieros, y abierto totalmente al crecimiento de islam.
O si quieres, puedes ir al Figaro, enlace abajo.
Standing Up in France
One hundred French intellectuals make a public declaration against Islamist totalitarianism.
Ibn Warraq
March 25, 2018
Public safety
On Friday, March 23, while he screamed “Allahu Akbar,” Redouan Lakdim killed three people in a supermarket in Southwestern France, where he had just taken hostages. First known to the police as a drug dealer, more recently Lakdim became known as a jihadi, an Islamic militant who proclaimed his allegiance to ISIS. He had demanded the release of Salah Abdeslam, the prime surviving suspect in the Islamic State attacks that killed 130 people in Paris in 2015. Yet he was allowed to circulate freely. Why?
All too often, the first reaction to such acts of Islamic terrorism is not horror at the barbaric acts and compassion for the victims, but an obsessive fear that “Islamophobia” will increase. In France, editorials in liberal outlets will once again warn against “conflation” (in French, the expression is “pas d’amalgam”), by which is meant that there should be no automatic identification of acts of terrorism with Islam. Islam is a religion of peace, we are instructed, and terrorists know nothing about true Islam. Liberal publications deny the evidence of the Koranic texts, Islamic principles, and the 1,400- year history of jihadi terrorism, which began with the Prophet Muhammad himself. They also ignore the writings of “modern” jihadists such as Sayyid Qutb, Abdullah Azzam, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and the Ayatollah Khomeini, which provide ample justification for holding Islam itself responsible for acts of terror.
Unfortunately, “Islamophobia” has now entered the dictionaries of all modern languages. It is at once a way to deflect any criticism or critical examination of Islam, on the one hand, and, on the other, a means for apologists to play victim. It is also no less than an attempt to stifle the fundamental principles of democracy and one of the glories of Western civilization—freedom of thought and expression. By demanding separate and privileged treatment, Islamists undermine another fundamental Western achievement—the concept of equality before the law, irrespective of race, gender, or religion. Islamists argue that they have been humiliated and victimized by French secularism; thus, their demand that we accept their Islamic laws, which they claim comes from God himself, but which reduce women and non-Muslims to an inferior status. If they prevail, the Islamists will undermine the principle that, more than any other, has resulted in unprecedented peace and prosperity in the West: the separation of state and religion, state and church, or state and mosque.
This brings us to the recent declaration by 100 French intellectuals against Islamist totalitarianism, published in the Paris daily newspaper Le Figaro. “We want to live in a world where no religion lays down the law,” it concludes. Some of the signatories have personal experience of the pernicious effects of new laws designed to protect the tender sensibilities of Muslims, and only Muslims. For example, award-winning historian Georges Bensoussan was acquitted in March 2017 of charges of incitement against Muslims; he had quoted an Algerian scholar who said that “in French Arab families, babies suckle anti-Semitism with their mother’s milk.” Another signatory, Mohamed Louizi, is being taken to court for defamation for having implied that French president Emmanuel Macron had been politically hostage to the Islamist vote. Louizi has an intimate knowledge of Islamists, since he’s a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Several other signers are also ex-Muslims, such as Walid al-Husseini, Boualem Sansal, and myself. We, too, have firsthand knowledge of Islamist ideology. We value the freedom of religion and from religion, which includes leaving or changing one’s faith, or not having any faith. Female signatories, such as Fatiha Boudjahlat and Fawzia Zouari, underline the need to defend women’s freedom to live their lives without interference from fundamentalists. Many signers are distinguished philosophers—Alain Finkielkraut, Luc Ferry, Renée Fregosi, Vincent Descombres, Rémi Brague, Philippe de Lara, Jean-Pierre Le Goff, Damien le Guay, and Yves-Charles Zarka—while others are historians, essayists (Pascal Bruckner), and professors. All are dedicated to secularism and the firm separation of state and religion; all, of course, value the free discussion of ideas, wherever it may lead.
Our worries are founded on facts, not irrational fears. Well-known Islamologist Gilles Kepel has remarked upon the inexorable rise of Islamist propaganda and proselytism in universities, where the ideas of the Salafists and Muslim Brotherhood are often promoted. Thankfully, French authorities have recently shut down 20 mosques and prayer halls that they found to be preaching radical Islamist ideology—hatred of non-Muslims and advocacy of jihad.
The French suburbs are rife with Islamic militants proselytizing among the young, imposing sharia on all (especially women), segregating swimming pools, demanding halal food, and so on. Incidents of anti-Semitism in France have multiplied dramatically, almost all of them perpetrated by Muslims. But if I were to say so in France, I might well be prosecuted for “Islamophobia.”
Ibn Warraq is the author, most recently, of The Islam in Islamic Terrorism.
Esto realmente no es demasiado off-topic. Los separatistas no desean un pais soberano de verdad, sino lo que otros han llamado un catalan open-space, poblado por gente liquida, entregado a entes financieros, y abierto totalmente al crecimiento de islam.
O si quieres, puedes ir al Figaro, enlace abajo.
Standing Up in France
One hundred French intellectuals make a public declaration against Islamist totalitarianism.
Ibn Warraq
March 25, 2018
Public safety
On Friday, March 23, while he screamed “Allahu Akbar,” Redouan Lakdim killed three people in a supermarket in Southwestern France, where he had just taken hostages. First known to the police as a drug dealer, more recently Lakdim became known as a jihadi, an Islamic militant who proclaimed his allegiance to ISIS. He had demanded the release of Salah Abdeslam, the prime surviving suspect in the Islamic State attacks that killed 130 people in Paris in 2015. Yet he was allowed to circulate freely. Why?
All too often, the first reaction to such acts of Islamic terrorism is not horror at the barbaric acts and compassion for the victims, but an obsessive fear that “Islamophobia” will increase. In France, editorials in liberal outlets will once again warn against “conflation” (in French, the expression is “pas d’amalgam”), by which is meant that there should be no automatic identification of acts of terrorism with Islam. Islam is a religion of peace, we are instructed, and terrorists know nothing about true Islam. Liberal publications deny the evidence of the Koranic texts, Islamic principles, and the 1,400- year history of jihadi terrorism, which began with the Prophet Muhammad himself. They also ignore the writings of “modern” jihadists such as Sayyid Qutb, Abdullah Azzam, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and the Ayatollah Khomeini, which provide ample justification for holding Islam itself responsible for acts of terror.
Unfortunately, “Islamophobia” has now entered the dictionaries of all modern languages. It is at once a way to deflect any criticism or critical examination of Islam, on the one hand, and, on the other, a means for apologists to play victim. It is also no less than an attempt to stifle the fundamental principles of democracy and one of the glories of Western civilization—freedom of thought and expression. By demanding separate and privileged treatment, Islamists undermine another fundamental Western achievement—the concept of equality before the law, irrespective of race, gender, or religion. Islamists argue that they have been humiliated and victimized by French secularism; thus, their demand that we accept their Islamic laws, which they claim comes from God himself, but which reduce women and non-Muslims to an inferior status. If they prevail, the Islamists will undermine the principle that, more than any other, has resulted in unprecedented peace and prosperity in the West: the separation of state and religion, state and church, or state and mosque.
This brings us to the recent declaration by 100 French intellectuals against Islamist totalitarianism, published in the Paris daily newspaper Le Figaro. “We want to live in a world where no religion lays down the law,” it concludes. Some of the signatories have personal experience of the pernicious effects of new laws designed to protect the tender sensibilities of Muslims, and only Muslims. For example, award-winning historian Georges Bensoussan was acquitted in March 2017 of charges of incitement against Muslims; he had quoted an Algerian scholar who said that “in French Arab families, babies suckle anti-Semitism with their mother’s milk.” Another signatory, Mohamed Louizi, is being taken to court for defamation for having implied that French president Emmanuel Macron had been politically hostage to the Islamist vote. Louizi has an intimate knowledge of Islamists, since he’s a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Several other signers are also ex-Muslims, such as Walid al-Husseini, Boualem Sansal, and myself. We, too, have firsthand knowledge of Islamist ideology. We value the freedom of religion and from religion, which includes leaving or changing one’s faith, or not having any faith. Female signatories, such as Fatiha Boudjahlat and Fawzia Zouari, underline the need to defend women’s freedom to live their lives without interference from fundamentalists. Many signers are distinguished philosophers—Alain Finkielkraut, Luc Ferry, Renée Fregosi, Vincent Descombres, Rémi Brague, Philippe de Lara, Jean-Pierre Le Goff, Damien le Guay, and Yves-Charles Zarka—while others are historians, essayists (Pascal Bruckner), and professors. All are dedicated to secularism and the firm separation of state and religion; all, of course, value the free discussion of ideas, wherever it may lead.
Our worries are founded on facts, not irrational fears. Well-known Islamologist Gilles Kepel has remarked upon the inexorable rise of Islamist propaganda and proselytism in universities, where the ideas of the Salafists and Muslim Brotherhood are often promoted. Thankfully, French authorities have recently shut down 20 mosques and prayer halls that they found to be preaching radical Islamist ideology—hatred of non-Muslims and advocacy of jihad.
The French suburbs are rife with Islamic militants proselytizing among the young, imposing sharia on all (especially women), segregating swimming pools, demanding halal food, and so on. Incidents of anti-Semitism in France have multiplied dramatically, almost all of them perpetrated by Muslims. But if I were to say so in France, I might well be prosecuted for “Islamophobia.”
Ibn Warraq is the author, most recently, of The Islam in Islamic Terrorism.
Protocolo (pendiente de aceptación): @Misaki
@Merlucilla. representante del partido en Waterloo[/QUOTE]
Buscamos representante en Alemania.[/QUOTE]
APROBADO Y PRESUPUESTADO. ¡Salud!
@Ner
cómo le llamas entonces a esto? porque que no te guste que lo diga en el foro es una cosa, y que no haya pasado otra, y no veo yo a independentistas haberlo criticado, es más... aquí se callan...
https://www.dolcacatalunya.com/wp-content/uploads/agresión-cdr-bandera.mp4?_=1
cómo le llamas entonces a esto? porque que no te guste que lo diga en el foro es una cosa, y que no haya pasado otra, y no veo yo a independentistas haberlo criticado, es más... aquí se callan...
https://www.dolcacatalunya.com/wp-content/uploads/agresión-cdr-bandera.mp4?_=1
- Registrado
- 30 Abr 2013
- Mensajes
- 6.493
- Calificaciones
- 45.902
Juan capitulo 18, versiculos 33 a 36
33. "Entonces Pilato entró de nuevo al pretorio y llamó a Jesús y le dijo: «¿Eres tú el Rey de los judíos?»
34. Respondió Jesús: «¿Dices eso por tu cuenta, o es que otros te lo han dicho de mí?»
35. Pilato respondió: «¿Es que yo soy judío? Tu pueblo y los sumos sacerdotes te han entregado a mí. ¿Qué has hecho?»
36. Respondió Jesús: «Mi Reino no es de este mundo. Si mi Reino fuese de este mundo, mi gente habría combatido para que no fuese entregado a los judíos: pero mi Reino no es de aquí.»"
Juan, 18 - Bíblia Católica Online
Leia mais em: https://www.bibliacatolica.com.br/la-biblia-de-jerusalen/juan/18/
O
Ondina
Guest
- Registrado
- 7 Mar 2015
- Mensajes
- 2.629
- Calificaciones
- 15.154
Yo como mi Presidente de la República de Cataluña no me rindo ,
los pueblos que deciden elegir libremente ,nunca se supeditaran ,a leyes injustas decimonónicas ni blindadas por un Estado fascista .
No sólo es mi Presidente Puigdemont ,es el honorable pueblo catalán con su lengua ,cultura ,costumbres ,tenacidad ,
europeísmo , los que no se rinden .
Respetar el derecho a formar un gobierno republicano para una República catalana. A quién ? que no se sienta y ame a Cataluña importa ? ... a nadie .
La unidad no se impone .
Quedaros unidos el resto de españoles, a los catalanes no nos importa la unidad de España .
Queremos vivir en paz ,armonía y estabilidad .
Lo lograremos a la pronta o a la larga .
El odio se vuelve contra las personas que lo generan .
Yo soy partidaria de amar y respetar , y nunca de imponer a otras personas una visión reduccionista ,en un país donde mucha gente sigue con esquemas mentales pre-democráticos .
PD : Catalonia is not Spain .
Me voy de viaje , aprendamos a vivir como buenos vecinos ,quizás desde EU nos lo reconvendrán .
los pueblos que deciden elegir libremente ,nunca se supeditaran ,a leyes injustas decimonónicas ni blindadas por un Estado fascista .
No sólo es mi Presidente Puigdemont ,es el honorable pueblo catalán con su lengua ,cultura ,costumbres ,tenacidad ,
europeísmo , los que no se rinden .
Respetar el derecho a formar un gobierno republicano para una República catalana. A quién ? que no se sienta y ame a Cataluña importa ? ... a nadie .
La unidad no se impone .
Quedaros unidos el resto de españoles, a los catalanes no nos importa la unidad de España .
Queremos vivir en paz ,armonía y estabilidad .
Lo lograremos a la pronta o a la larga .
El odio se vuelve contra las personas que lo generan .
Yo soy partidaria de amar y respetar , y nunca de imponer a otras personas una visión reduccionista ,en un país donde mucha gente sigue con esquemas mentales pre-democráticos .
PD : Catalonia is not Spain .
Me voy de viaje , aprendamos a vivir como buenos vecinos ,quizás desde EU nos lo reconvendrán .
Lucas 22 34 Entonces les dijo: Pero ahora, el que tenga una bolsa, que la lleve consigo, de la misma manera también una alforja, y el que no tenga espada, venda su manto y compre una.
Es un libro muy curioso me encanto. Interesante el capitulo dedicado al mesianismo
Vacas, cerdos, guerras y brujas: Los enigmas de la cultura (El Libro De Bolsillo - Bibliotecas De Autor - Biblioteca Harris)
17 enero 2011
de Marvin Harris y Juan Oliver Sánchez Fernández
- Estado
