- Registrado
- 26 Ago 2013
- Mensajes
- 22.640
- Calificaciones
- 137.631
The Prince, the pauper and the paedophile peer: the dangerous questions the BBC failed to ask.
The BBC blew its chance to quiz the Prince about his friendship with a notorious paedophile peer who lived in London during its so-called 'no holds barred' TV interview.
by admin 16 November, 2019, 10:24 am 2 Comments
By Joseph de Burca.
SOME REALLY DANGEROUS QUESTIONS WERE NOT ASKED
The BBC’s idea of a hard interview was not to ask the really dangerous questions:The BBC did not ask Prince Andrew a single question about his relationship with Lord Greville Janner, nor if he remembers Alan Kerr from Belfast, in its much hyped and so-called ‘no holds barred’ interview broadcast on Saturday 16 November. Why?
The BBC’s Emily Maitlis has broadcast the interview she conducted with Prince Andrew about his relationship with the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. It was billed as a ‘no holds barred’ interview. Unfortunately, Maitlis did not ask a single question about his relationship with the notorious child molester, Lord Greville Janner.
Yet the Prince’s relationship with Janner raises as many questions as that of his friendship with Epstein.
The British media has turned a blind eye to the Janner-Duke of York relationship.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sex (IISCA) in London chaired by Professor Alexis Jay may soon abandon its inquiry into Janner completely. If it does, the Prince will get to heave yet another deep sigh of relief for he will not have to face questions about his friendship with Janner from that quarter either.
The BBC turned Jimmy Savile, a friend of the Royal Family, into a TV superstar and turned a blind eye while he spent decades raping children.
Alan Kerr, an Irish victim of sex abuse from Belfast, has provided the IICSA with details about the Prince’s friendship with Janner. Kerr’s story was revealed exclusively by this magazine. Readers who are not familiar with it are invited to read ‘The Boy on the Meat Rack’ and ‘Out of the Frying Pan and into the Fire’ on this website. (Click on the ‘Alan Kerr’ tab at the end of this story.)
The Artful Dodger: The Prince has no need to hide from the BBC, they are not interested in his relationship with Lord Janner.
A PRINCE WHO IS ABOVE THE LAW
The possibility that the IICSA will not investigate Janner comes in the wake of an announcement last August that the Metropolitian Police were not going to investigate the Prince for having had sex in London with Virginia Roberts when she was 17. A spokesperson for the Met announced that it investigated allegations he had “had sex with Virginia Roberts Giuffre aged 17 in Ghislaine Maxwell’s bathroom” in London and confirmed that while they had received “an allegation of non-recent trafficking for sexual exploitation’ that ‘no further action is being taken”.
Last August Channel 4 News discovered that the Met had “reviewed the available evidence” and decided that the matter “would not progress to a full investigation”. The Met’s purported inquiry had begun with a review of the “available evidence” in 2015 after receiving a complaint over claims in US court papers that a girl was “forced to have sex with Prince Andrew”.
Independently, Roberts’ lawyers contacted the Met in 2016.
A further complaint concerning the sexual trafficking of Roberts to the UK was received by the Met in 2015 from an unconnected third party.
Doffing her cap: The supine Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Hick, a citizen who truly knows her place in society. Her service will not be investigating His Royal Highness.
As Channel 4 disclosed, ‘The Met Police has refused to answer detailed questions about the allegations and whether they ever spoke to Epstein, his friend Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew or anyone from the Royal Household. Channel 4 News asked the Metropolitan Police a series of questions about Virginia Roberts’account of what she says happened to her at Maxwell’s London residence in early 2001. The Met told Channel 4 News: “[We] can confirm that the Metropolitan Police Service [MPS] received an allegation of non-recent trafficking for sexual exploitation. The MPS reviewed the available evidence and the decision was made that this would not progress to a full investigation. As such, the matter was closed”.
It will come as no surprise that the Prince chose the BBC, not Channel 4 for his interview about Epstein.
THE PRINCE IS CLAIMING THIS WOMAN IS A LIAR AND A FORGER.
‘No recollection’: The Prince has told the BBC he cannot recall having met Virginia Roberts yet is somehow confident he did not have sex with her. He is seen here with her and Epstein’s pimp and trafficker, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Prince has accused Roberts of having fabricated the photograph. Maxwell, who was described by the Prince as his ‘friend’, has disappeared. He last spoke to her in the spring of 2019, he says.
Ghislaine Maxwell procured and trained underage girls to have sex with adult males, as part of Jeffrey Epstein’s now infamous international paedophile ring. Roberts has spoken about how she was taken to London in 2001 by Epstein. During her trip, she was awoken from her sleep by Ghislane Maxwell who told her ‘you’re gonna meet a prince today’. That night she went out dancing with Prince Andrew in a club where he gave her alcohol and she was later ‘forced’ to have sex with him.
She claims had sex on two other occasions with the Prince. Although the Prince had precise dates, times and places at the tip of his fingers, he affected genuine surprise at the suggestion he had participated in an orgy in America with her. This demonstrates that he was putting on a performance for the cameras. His facial expression was tantamount to a lie: how could he have been so surprised at an accusation – acting as if it was the first time he had heard it – if he was long since familiar with it?
Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein
HAS TIME RUN OUT FOR THE JANNER STRAND OF THE IICSA’S INQUIRY INTO CHILD RAPE?
A friend of the Royal Family, the Queen and child rapist Lord Janner.
On 9 March 2016 Ben Emmerson QC for the IICSA said the Janner investigation “has been identified for an early hearing, partly in recognition of the length of time the complainants in this matter have had to wait before their allegations could be heard. The Janner investigation is one of four investigations in which preliminary hearings are being heard this month and in which early public hearing of the evidence are expected”.
Pimp by Royal Appointment? Did Janner pimp for the aristocracy?
The Janner strand was intended to have opened in September 2016 but was moved to March 2017. It was adjourned again in the expectation it would be heard in 2018 but was then moved to a three-week slot in February 2020. It may now not proceed at all.
Overall, the Inquiry proposes to conclude its hearing by November 2020 and publish a final report by March 2022. The threat of discontinuance of the Janner strand arises from the fact the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) is considering whether or not to prosecute an unnamed individual on a referral from the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). The Janner strand may not proceed while the CPS decides whether or not it will prosecute the individual. If the CPS decides to prosecute, the IICSA will have to wait until after the prosecution has been completed. By then IICSA may have completed its hearings. If there are further delays and or appeals, the IICSA may even be wound up by the time all issues are determined.
Is Jay going to let Janner off the hook?Prof. Alexis Jay who has to decide if the IICSA will ever proceed with the Janner module. The pressure on her must be unbearable as it begins to look like Janner – like Epstein – was a VIP pimp.
Unfortunately, the CPS was not in a position to tell the IICSA when it will arrive at its decision.
In the meantime, none of the 350,000 pages of documentation which have been amassed over the past four and half years by the IICSA have been released to witnesses such as Alan Kerr. They will never be released if the Janner strand is abandoned.
MORE: THE PRINCE, THE PAUPER AND THE PAEDOPHILE PEER http://disq.us/t/3il97fc
The BBC blew its chance to quiz the Prince about his friendship with a notorious paedophile peer who lived in London during its so-called 'no holds barred' TV interview.
by admin 16 November, 2019, 10:24 am 2 Comments
By Joseph de Burca.
SOME REALLY DANGEROUS QUESTIONS WERE NOT ASKED
The BBC’s Emily Maitlis has broadcast the interview she conducted with Prince Andrew about his relationship with the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. It was billed as a ‘no holds barred’ interview. Unfortunately, Maitlis did not ask a single question about his relationship with the notorious child molester, Lord Greville Janner.
Yet the Prince’s relationship with Janner raises as many questions as that of his friendship with Epstein.
The British media has turned a blind eye to the Janner-Duke of York relationship.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sex (IISCA) in London chaired by Professor Alexis Jay may soon abandon its inquiry into Janner completely. If it does, the Prince will get to heave yet another deep sigh of relief for he will not have to face questions about his friendship with Janner from that quarter either.
The BBC turned Jimmy Savile, a friend of the Royal Family, into a TV superstar and turned a blind eye while he spent decades raping children.
Alan Kerr, an Irish victim of sex abuse from Belfast, has provided the IICSA with details about the Prince’s friendship with Janner. Kerr’s story was revealed exclusively by this magazine. Readers who are not familiar with it are invited to read ‘The Boy on the Meat Rack’ and ‘Out of the Frying Pan and into the Fire’ on this website. (Click on the ‘Alan Kerr’ tab at the end of this story.)
The Artful Dodger: The Prince has no need to hide from the BBC, they are not interested in his relationship with Lord Janner.
A PRINCE WHO IS ABOVE THE LAW
The possibility that the IICSA will not investigate Janner comes in the wake of an announcement last August that the Metropolitian Police were not going to investigate the Prince for having had sex in London with Virginia Roberts when she was 17. A spokesperson for the Met announced that it investigated allegations he had “had sex with Virginia Roberts Giuffre aged 17 in Ghislaine Maxwell’s bathroom” in London and confirmed that while they had received “an allegation of non-recent trafficking for sexual exploitation’ that ‘no further action is being taken”.
Last August Channel 4 News discovered that the Met had “reviewed the available evidence” and decided that the matter “would not progress to a full investigation”. The Met’s purported inquiry had begun with a review of the “available evidence” in 2015 after receiving a complaint over claims in US court papers that a girl was “forced to have sex with Prince Andrew”.
Independently, Roberts’ lawyers contacted the Met in 2016.
A further complaint concerning the sexual trafficking of Roberts to the UK was received by the Met in 2015 from an unconnected third party.
Doffing her cap: The supine Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Hick, a citizen who truly knows her place in society. Her service will not be investigating His Royal Highness.
As Channel 4 disclosed, ‘The Met Police has refused to answer detailed questions about the allegations and whether they ever spoke to Epstein, his friend Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew or anyone from the Royal Household. Channel 4 News asked the Metropolitan Police a series of questions about Virginia Roberts’account of what she says happened to her at Maxwell’s London residence in early 2001. The Met told Channel 4 News: “[We] can confirm that the Metropolitan Police Service [MPS] received an allegation of non-recent trafficking for sexual exploitation. The MPS reviewed the available evidence and the decision was made that this would not progress to a full investigation. As such, the matter was closed”.
It will come as no surprise that the Prince chose the BBC, not Channel 4 for his interview about Epstein.
THE PRINCE IS CLAIMING THIS WOMAN IS A LIAR AND A FORGER.
‘No recollection’: The Prince has told the BBC he cannot recall having met Virginia Roberts yet is somehow confident he did not have sex with her. He is seen here with her and Epstein’s pimp and trafficker, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Prince has accused Roberts of having fabricated the photograph. Maxwell, who was described by the Prince as his ‘friend’, has disappeared. He last spoke to her in the spring of 2019, he says.
Ghislaine Maxwell procured and trained underage girls to have sex with adult males, as part of Jeffrey Epstein’s now infamous international paedophile ring. Roberts has spoken about how she was taken to London in 2001 by Epstein. During her trip, she was awoken from her sleep by Ghislane Maxwell who told her ‘you’re gonna meet a prince today’. That night she went out dancing with Prince Andrew in a club where he gave her alcohol and she was later ‘forced’ to have sex with him.
She claims had sex on two other occasions with the Prince. Although the Prince had precise dates, times and places at the tip of his fingers, he affected genuine surprise at the suggestion he had participated in an orgy in America with her. This demonstrates that he was putting on a performance for the cameras. His facial expression was tantamount to a lie: how could he have been so surprised at an accusation – acting as if it was the first time he had heard it – if he was long since familiar with it?
HAS TIME RUN OUT FOR THE JANNER STRAND OF THE IICSA’S INQUIRY INTO CHILD RAPE?
A friend of the Royal Family, the Queen and child rapist Lord Janner.
On 9 March 2016 Ben Emmerson QC for the IICSA said the Janner investigation “has been identified for an early hearing, partly in recognition of the length of time the complainants in this matter have had to wait before their allegations could be heard. The Janner investigation is one of four investigations in which preliminary hearings are being heard this month and in which early public hearing of the evidence are expected”.
Pimp by Royal Appointment? Did Janner pimp for the aristocracy?
The Janner strand was intended to have opened in September 2016 but was moved to March 2017. It was adjourned again in the expectation it would be heard in 2018 but was then moved to a three-week slot in February 2020. It may now not proceed at all.
Overall, the Inquiry proposes to conclude its hearing by November 2020 and publish a final report by March 2022. The threat of discontinuance of the Janner strand arises from the fact the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) is considering whether or not to prosecute an unnamed individual on a referral from the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). The Janner strand may not proceed while the CPS decides whether or not it will prosecute the individual. If the CPS decides to prosecute, the IICSA will have to wait until after the prosecution has been completed. By then IICSA may have completed its hearings. If there are further delays and or appeals, the IICSA may even be wound up by the time all issues are determined.
Unfortunately, the CPS was not in a position to tell the IICSA when it will arrive at its decision.
In the meantime, none of the 350,000 pages of documentation which have been amassed over the past four and half years by the IICSA have been released to witnesses such as Alan Kerr. They will never be released if the Janner strand is abandoned.
MORE: THE PRINCE, THE PAUPER AND THE PAEDOPHILE PEER http://disq.us/t/3il97fc
/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-infobae.s3.amazonaws.com/public/M3C2ICZEY5G3TB27KYWXYXCZ5E.jpg)
:quality(85)//arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-infobae.s3.amazonaws.com/public/T7TIZEFDYFAZ7LMH5RQ6PGPROM.jpg)
