Y nos han estado intentando convencer de que era su favorita, que la adoraba, que la hacía reir mientras que Kate le parecía una sosa y no le gustaba nada. Por supuesto todos sabemos de donde venían esos rumores. Me alegro de que la reina les haya puesto , por fin, en su sitio.
Duques de Sussex: Opiniones en su contra.
- Autormajo
- Fecha de inicio
Siempre que veo fotos de la boda me acuerdo de esto. MM me recuerda muchísimo a Ursula, la misma expresión de gato que se ha comido al ratón.PRINCE Charles was excited about his daughter-in-law being the star guest at his exhibition opening.
After walking her down the aisle, the future king had developed a special bond with Meghan and thought he had helped ease her introduction into such a difficult public role.
6
There are very real tensions behind the scenes between Harry and the Royal Family, including dad Charles and brother Prince WilliamCredit: Getty - Contributor
6
Charles developed a special bond with Meghan and thought he had helped ease her introduction into such a difficult public roleCredit: Pixel8000
But at the last minute word got around that the Duchess of Sussex had decided not to attend. What led to such a snub?
The Sussexes had learned the Prince of Wales’ team might have television cameras present for the filming of an upcoming TV special about Charles’ work.
As we now know, Meghan and Harry were already planning their own bombshell documentary for ITV and Team Sussex was not prepared to allow the Duchess a starring role in a rival show.
It might appear petty but such a decision shows the very real tensions behind the scenes between Harry and the Royal Family, including dad Charles and brother Prince William.
As I revealed yesterday, the Queen, now 93, is quite rightly deferring to Charles, 70, when it comes to the deeply complicated interpersonal dynamics currently dividing senior members of the Royal Family. So how on earth did we end up here?
While Harry, 35, and Meghan, 38, are most certainly not to blame — each side is equally competitive — their union provided the early spark for the division.
While previously incredibly tight, strains started to show between William and Harry soon after the relationship started. There were a few key moments.
In November 2018 I was the first to reveal Kate and Meghan had a falling out over the way the new American princess had spoken to staff. That was quickly followed by news Meghan had left Kate in tears over her demands for Princess Charlotte’s bridesmaid dress.
It would later emerge that around the same time, William had warned Harry he was rushing into marriage. A distancing of the two brothers personally would have real implications for the future shape of the monarchy.
Dreams of a modernising Fab Four made up of Kate, William, Meghan and Harry were quickly dashed. Meghan and Harry would leave their residence and office they shared with William and Kate, both 37, at Kensington Palace and set up house at Windsor.
CULTURE CLASH
Harry and Meghan were also to quit the incredibly successful charity foundation — responsible for the mental health initiative Heads Up and the Invictus Games.
The Sussexes wanted their own court, which would allow them total freedom. But Prince Charles and his team at Clarence House were not having it.
Given his place in the pecking order, Harry would have to sit with other more minor royals like Prince Andrew and Princess Anne under the Queen’s court at Buckingham Palace.
Crucially, that allowed Charles a degree of power over funding for the couple. But the culture clash was near immediate.
Harry and Meghan, and their millennial staff who do not give a damn about royal traditions, have felt the old-timers at Buckingham Palace were out to get them — blaming them for leaking various stories to the Pressabout everything from the location of their new offices to private jet travel arrangements.
The splits in the royal households were exacerbated by the departure of the Queen’s respected former private secretary Christopher Geidt, who resigned in 2017 after ten years.
A royal source said: “Charles and Prince Andrew engineered his removal in order to have more power but it has backfired because Christopher acted as a central authority and he brought people together. Nobody does that any more.”
At the same time, Wills and Kate went through a total overhaul atKensington Palace to position the Queen’s oldest grandson very much as a king in waiting.
As the lives of Harry and Meghan dominated the media on both sides of the Atlantic, Charles felt like the forgotten man. And as we revealed yesterday he is “absolutely furious” that he has, yet again, been undermined by Harry and Meghan’s bombshell ITV documentary on Sunday night.
His trip to Japan and own ITV series, which started last night, have been virtually ignored. But royal sources say it is still Charles who holds the key to being able to bring the Sussexes back in line.
'DISRUPTIVE & DISREPUTABLE'
And right now many in the royal household are pushing him to take action after the couple’s outlandish briefing to CNN that claimed they had “single-handedly modernised the monarchy”.
A senior insider tells me: “Harry and Meghan are partly funded by the sovereign grant and partly by Charles. He could threaten to pull funding. Meghan doesn’t have much of her own wealth. Harry has got about 20million in the bank. If they behave in a disruptive and disreputable manner, that tap will be turned off.”
However, Harry and Meghan feel very differently about the situation, believing the royal institution had not been there to support the new American entrant.
That is why ex-Suits actress Meghan’s decision to damn the British stiff upper lip mentality as “damaging” during her dramatic and emotional interview with Tom Bradby on Sunday was so telling this week.
No longer were the couple going after their various enemies in the media, but it appeared to be a direct attack on the monarchy itself, reminiscent of criticism by Princess Diana in her bombshell 1995 Panorama interview.
In a further escalation of the rhetoric, a source close to Harry and Meghan told me this week: “Harry is back at Frogmore Cottage and has never been stronger. This is an institution full of people panicked they may potentially look out of touch and ultimately to blame for a lack of support.”
There is no other way to take such a comment than as a direct attack on an institution run by Harry’s grandmother and father. Charles in particular feels echoes of his concern for Diana, someone he feared for right up until her death but never felt he could help.
Harry has most certainly inherited his mum’s ability to feel emotion and pain deeply — traits not celebrated in the Royal Family.
Some say he also shares her tendency to have a victim complex and be deeply paranoid about those who actually are trying to help him. A senior royal source said: “Charles’ concern is being driven out of his love for Prince Harry.
DEEPLY PARANOID
“This carefree young guy who used to be the best thing the Royal Family had — messing about with the Obamas, making the Queen laugh — he seems to be sad and to have lost his way. If they seem fragile in public, it’s worse in private. Meghan is in tears regularly and this brings out Harry’s protective instincts.”
For now, royal sources hope Harry and Meghan will recharge away from the spotlight during six weeks of holiday, expected to start imminently in the US. Certainly, nobody expects them to be around on December 3 when the Queen plays host to Nato leaders including US President Donald Trump, to mark its 70th anniversary.
A royal source said: “Meghan missed Trump during the State visit and Harry acted like a sulky teen around him.”
Harry and Meghan have both been urged to cut down on political pronouncements but they have ignored the advice so far. Tomorrow, for example, the Duchess will attend a roundtable discussion on gender equality at Windsor Castle.
Another royal insider explained: “They don’t take advice well and shut out opposing views. It’s not wise but who can tell them otherwise? Harry’s war on the tabloid Press is of a piece with that. Who thinks that’s a good idea? Almost nobody in the royal household.”
Tensions are never far from the surface. There is a plan for William to go to the Rugby World Cup final if Wales get there, while Harry will join him if England beat New Zealand. But let’s see if he can get permission from his wife,” sniped one royal staff member. So what happens next?
One ally of Charles said: “Everyone needs to stand back, take a deep breath, stop sniping and work out what is the best long-term strategy to make this work. Harry and Meghan clearly need a break. If it doesn’t calm down, I could see them moving abroad and scaling back their royal duties.”
Many within the Royal Family are desperate for The Queen to step in, bang some heads together and sort the whole situation out. Especially given the series of damaging headlines the monarchy is already facing over Prince Andrew’s close connections with disgraced child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself in prison earlier this year.
But a senior royal source told me this week: “The Queen obviously doesn’t like this type of drama playing out in public. Her entire success as monarch has been rising above situations like this. That would be a good lesson for some of her relatives to learn from.
Siempre que veo fotos de la boda me acuerdo de esto. MM me recuerda muchísimo a Ursula, la misma expresión de gato que se ha comido al ratón.
Ahora si me hiciste reír es verdad!
WINDSORS AT WAR
El reciente desaire de Meghan Markle a la invitación a la exposición del Príncipe Carlos revela las tensiones reales en la Familia Real
EXCLUSIVO
Dan Wootton, editor ejecutivo
25 oct 2019, 8:52 Actualizado: 25 oct 2019, 10:23
PRÍNCIPE Charles estaba emocionado de que su nuera fuera la invitada estrella en la inauguración de su exposición.
Después de acompañarla por el pasillo, el futuro rey había desarrollado un vínculo especial con Meghan Markle y pensó que había ayudado a facilitar su introducción en un papel público tan difícil.
Hay tensiones muy reales detrás de escena entre Harry y la familia real, incluido el padre Charles y el hermano Príncipe William
Pero a última hora se corrió la voz de que la duquesa de Sussex había decidido no asistir. ¿Qué llevó a tal desaire?
Los Sussex habían aprendido que el equipo del Príncipe de Gales podría tener cámaras de televisión presentes para la filmación de un próximo especial de televisión sobre el trabajo de Charles.
Como ahora sabemos, Meghan Markle y el Príncipe Harry ya estaban planeando su propio documental bomba para ITV y el Equipo Sussex no estaba preparado para permitirle a la Duquesa un papel protagonista en un espectáculo rival.
Puede parecer insignificante, pero tal decisión muestra las tensiones muy reales detrás de escena entre Harry y la Familia Real, incluido el padre Charles y el hermano Príncipe William.
Como revelé ayer, la Reina, que ahora tiene 93 años, está diferiendo con razón a Charles, de 70 años, en lo que respecta a la dinámica interpersonal profundamente complicada que actualmente divide a los miembros principales de la Familia Real. Entonces, ¿cómo diablos terminamos aquí?
Pero a última hora se corrió la voz de que la duquesa de Sussex había decidido no asistir. ¿Qué llevó a tal desaire?
Los Sussex habían aprendido que el equipo del Príncipe de Gales podría tener cámaras de televisión presentes para la filmación de un próximo especial de televisión sobre el trabajo de Charles.
Como ahora sabemos, Meghan Markle y el Príncipe Harry ya estaban planeando su propio documental bomba para ITV y el Equipo Sussex no estaba preparado para permitirle a la Duquesa un papel protagonista en un espectáculo rival.
Puede parecer insignificante, pero tal decisión muestra las tensiones muy reales detrás de escena entre Harry y la Familia Real, incluido el padre Charles y el hermano Príncipe William.
Como revelé ayer, la Reina, que ahora tiene 93 años, está diferiendo con razón con Charles, de 70 años, en lo que respecta a la dinámica interpersonal profundamente complicada que actualmente divide a los miembros principales de la Familia Real. Entonces, ¿cómo diablos terminamos aquí?
Mientras que el Príncipe Harry, de 35 años, y Meghan Markle, de 38, ciertamente no tienen la culpa, cada lado es igualmente competitivo, su unión proporcionó la chispa temprana para la división.
Aunque anteriormente era increíblemente apretado, las tensiones comenzaron a mostrarse entre William y Harry poco después de que comenzara la relación. Hubo algunos momentos clave.
En noviembre de 2018, fui la primera en revelar que Kate y Meghan se pelearon por la forma en que la nueva princesa estadounidense había hablado con el personal. Eso fue seguido rápidamente por la noticia de que Meghan había dejado a Kate llorando por sus demandas por el vestido de dama de honor de la princesa Charlotte.
Más tarde se supo que al mismo tiempo, William le había advertido a Harry que se apresuraba al casarse. El distanciamiento de los dos hermanos personalmente tendría implicaciones reales para la forma futura de la monarquía.
Los sueños de un Fab Four modernizador compuesto por Kate, William, Meghan y Harry se desvanecieron rápidamente. Meghan y Harry dejarían su residencia y oficina que compartieron con William y Kate, ambos de 37 años, en el Palacio de Kensington y se instalaron en Windsor.
Conflictos Culturales
Harry y Meghan también debían renunciar a la fundación benéfica increíblemente exitosa, responsable de la iniciativa de salud mental Heads Up y los Juegos Invictus.
Los Sussex querían su propia corte, lo que les permitiría una libertad total. Pero el príncipe Carlos y su equipo en Clarence House no lo realizaban como alternativa.
Dado su lugar en el orden jerárquico, Harry tendría que sentarse con otros miembros de la realeza menores como el príncipe Andrew y la princesa Anne bajo la corte de la reina en el Palacio de Buckingham.
Crucialmente, eso le permitió a Charles cierto grado de poder sobre los fondos para la pareja. Pero el choque cultural fue casi inmediato.
Harry y Meghan, y su personal milenium a los que no les importan las tradiciones reales, han sentido que los veteranos del Palacio de Buckingham estaban tratando de atraparlos, culpándolos por filtrar varias historias a la prensa sobre todo desde la ubicación de su nuevo oficinas para viajes privados en jet.
Las divisiones en los asesores reales se vieron exacerbadas por la partida del respetado ex secretario privado de la reina Christopher Geidt, quien renunció en 2017 después de diez años.
Deshonroso y desprestigiado
'DISRUPTIVO Y DESREPUTABLE
Y en este momento, muchos miembros de la familia real lo están presionando para que tome medidas después de la extravagante sesión informativa de la pareja a CNN que afirmó que habían "modernizado la monarquía por sí solos".
Un experto de alto nivel me dice: “Harry y Meghan son financiados en parte por la subvención soberana y en parte por Charles. Podría amenazar con retirar fondos. Meghan no tiene mucho de su propia riqueza. Harry tiene unos 20 millones en el banco. Si se comportan de manera disruptiva y de mala reputación, ese grifo se cerrará. "
Sin embargo, Harry y Meghan se sentían muy diferentes sobre la situación, creyendo que la institución real no había estado allí para apoyar al nuevo participante estadounidense.
Es por eso que la decisión de la ex actriz de Suits Meghan de condenar la rígida mentalidad del labio superior británico como "perjudicial" durante su dramática y emotiva entrevista con Tom Bradby el domingo fue tan reveladora esta semana.
La pareja ya no perseguía a sus diversos enemigos en los medios de comunicación, pero parecía ser un ataque directo a la monarquía en sí misma, recordando las críticas de la princesa Diana en su bomba de la entrevista Panorama de 1995.
El reciente desaire de Meghan Markle a la invitación a la exposición del Príncipe Carlos revela las tensiones reales en la Familia Real
EXCLUSIVO
Dan Wootton, editor ejecutivo
25 oct 2019, 8:52 Actualizado: 25 oct 2019, 10:23
PRÍNCIPE Charles estaba emocionado de que su nuera fuera la invitada estrella en la inauguración de su exposición.
Después de acompañarla por el pasillo, el futuro rey había desarrollado un vínculo especial con Meghan Markle y pensó que había ayudado a facilitar su introducción en un papel público tan difícil.
Hay tensiones muy reales detrás de escena entre Harry y la familia real, incluido el padre Charles y el hermano Príncipe William
Pero a última hora se corrió la voz de que la duquesa de Sussex había decidido no asistir. ¿Qué llevó a tal desaire?
Los Sussex habían aprendido que el equipo del Príncipe de Gales podría tener cámaras de televisión presentes para la filmación de un próximo especial de televisión sobre el trabajo de Charles.
Como ahora sabemos, Meghan Markle y el Príncipe Harry ya estaban planeando su propio documental bomba para ITV y el Equipo Sussex no estaba preparado para permitirle a la Duquesa un papel protagonista en un espectáculo rival.
Puede parecer insignificante, pero tal decisión muestra las tensiones muy reales detrás de escena entre Harry y la Familia Real, incluido el padre Charles y el hermano Príncipe William.
Como revelé ayer, la Reina, que ahora tiene 93 años, está diferiendo con razón a Charles, de 70 años, en lo que respecta a la dinámica interpersonal profundamente complicada que actualmente divide a los miembros principales de la Familia Real. Entonces, ¿cómo diablos terminamos aquí?
Pero a última hora se corrió la voz de que la duquesa de Sussex había decidido no asistir. ¿Qué llevó a tal desaire?
Los Sussex habían aprendido que el equipo del Príncipe de Gales podría tener cámaras de televisión presentes para la filmación de un próximo especial de televisión sobre el trabajo de Charles.
Como ahora sabemos, Meghan Markle y el Príncipe Harry ya estaban planeando su propio documental bomba para ITV y el Equipo Sussex no estaba preparado para permitirle a la Duquesa un papel protagonista en un espectáculo rival.
Puede parecer insignificante, pero tal decisión muestra las tensiones muy reales detrás de escena entre Harry y la Familia Real, incluido el padre Charles y el hermano Príncipe William.
Como revelé ayer, la Reina, que ahora tiene 93 años, está diferiendo con razón con Charles, de 70 años, en lo que respecta a la dinámica interpersonal profundamente complicada que actualmente divide a los miembros principales de la Familia Real. Entonces, ¿cómo diablos terminamos aquí?
Mientras que el Príncipe Harry, de 35 años, y Meghan Markle, de 38, ciertamente no tienen la culpa, cada lado es igualmente competitivo, su unión proporcionó la chispa temprana para la división.
Aunque anteriormente era increíblemente apretado, las tensiones comenzaron a mostrarse entre William y Harry poco después de que comenzara la relación. Hubo algunos momentos clave.
En noviembre de 2018, fui la primera en revelar que Kate y Meghan se pelearon por la forma en que la nueva princesa estadounidense había hablado con el personal. Eso fue seguido rápidamente por la noticia de que Meghan había dejado a Kate llorando por sus demandas por el vestido de dama de honor de la princesa Charlotte.
Más tarde se supo que al mismo tiempo, William le había advertido a Harry que se apresuraba al casarse. El distanciamiento de los dos hermanos personalmente tendría implicaciones reales para la forma futura de la monarquía.
Los sueños de un Fab Four modernizador compuesto por Kate, William, Meghan y Harry se desvanecieron rápidamente. Meghan y Harry dejarían su residencia y oficina que compartieron con William y Kate, ambos de 37 años, en el Palacio de Kensington y se instalaron en Windsor.
Conflictos Culturales
Harry y Meghan también debían renunciar a la fundación benéfica increíblemente exitosa, responsable de la iniciativa de salud mental Heads Up y los Juegos Invictus.
Los Sussex querían su propia corte, lo que les permitiría una libertad total. Pero el príncipe Carlos y su equipo en Clarence House no lo realizaban como alternativa.
Dado su lugar en el orden jerárquico, Harry tendría que sentarse con otros miembros de la realeza menores como el príncipe Andrew y la princesa Anne bajo la corte de la reina en el Palacio de Buckingham.
Crucialmente, eso le permitió a Charles cierto grado de poder sobre los fondos para la pareja. Pero el choque cultural fue casi inmediato.
Harry y Meghan, y su personal milenium a los que no les importan las tradiciones reales, han sentido que los veteranos del Palacio de Buckingham estaban tratando de atraparlos, culpándolos por filtrar varias historias a la prensa sobre todo desde la ubicación de su nuevo oficinas para viajes privados en jet.
Las divisiones en los asesores reales se vieron exacerbadas por la partida del respetado ex secretario privado de la reina Christopher Geidt, quien renunció en 2017 después de diez años.
Deshonroso y desprestigiado
'DISRUPTIVO Y DESREPUTABLE
Y en este momento, muchos miembros de la familia real lo están presionando para que tome medidas después de la extravagante sesión informativa de la pareja a CNN que afirmó que habían "modernizado la monarquía por sí solos".
Un experto de alto nivel me dice: “Harry y Meghan son financiados en parte por la subvención soberana y en parte por Charles. Podría amenazar con retirar fondos. Meghan no tiene mucho de su propia riqueza. Harry tiene unos 20 millones en el banco. Si se comportan de manera disruptiva y de mala reputación, ese grifo se cerrará. "
Sin embargo, Harry y Meghan se sentían muy diferentes sobre la situación, creyendo que la institución real no había estado allí para apoyar al nuevo participante estadounidense.
Es por eso que la decisión de la ex actriz de Suits Meghan de condenar la rígida mentalidad del labio superior británico como "perjudicial" durante su dramática y emotiva entrevista con Tom Bradby el domingo fue tan reveladora esta semana.
La pareja ya no perseguía a sus diversos enemigos en los medios de comunicación, pero parecía ser un ataque directo a la monarquía en sí misma, recordando las críticas de la princesa Diana en su bomba de la entrevista Panorama de 1995.
6
There are very real tensions behind the scenes between Harry and the Royal Family, including dad Charles and brother Prince WilliamCredit: Getty - Contributor
6
Charles developed a special bond with Meghan and thought he had helped ease her introduction into such a difficult public roleCredit: Pixel8000
But at the last minute word got around that the Duchess of Sussex had decided not to attend. What led to such a snub?
The Sussexes had learned the Prince of Wales’ team might have television cameras present for the filming of an upcoming TV special about Charles’ work.
As we now know, Meghan and Harry were already planning their own bombshell documentary for ITV and Team Sussex was not prepared to allow the Duchess a starring role in a rival show.
It might appear petty but such a decision shows the very real tensions behind the scenes between Harry and the Royal Family, including dad Charles and brother Prince William.
As I revealed yesterday, the Queen, now 93, is quite rightly deferring to Charles, 70, when it comes to the deeply complicated interpersonal dynamics currently dividing senior members of the Royal Family. So how on earth did we end up here?
While Harry, 35, and Meghan, 38, are most certainly not to blame — each side is equally competitive — their union provided the early spark for the division.
While previously incredibly tight, strains started to show between William and Harry soon after the relationship started. There were a few key moments.
In November 2018 I was the first to reveal Kate and Meghan had a falling out over the way the new American princess had spoken to staff. That was quickly followed by news Meghan had left Kate in tears over her demands for Princess Charlotte’s bridesmaid dress.
It would later emerge that around the same time, William had warned Harry he was rushing into marriage. A distancing of the two brothers personally would have real implications for the future shape of the monarchy.
Dreams of a modernising Fab Four made up of Kate, William, Meghan and Harry were quickly dashed. Meghan and Harry would leave their residence and office they shared with William and Kate, both 37, at Kensington Palace and set up house at Windsor.
CULTURE CLASH
Harry and Meghan were also to quit the incredibly successful charity foundation — responsible for the mental health initiative Heads Up and the Invictus Games.
The Sussexes wanted their own court, which would allow them total freedom. But Prince Charles and his team at Clarence House were not having it.
Given his place in the pecking order, Harry would have to sit with other more minor royals like Prince Andrew and Princess Anne under the Queen’s court at Buckingham Palace.
Crucially, that allowed Charles a degree of power over funding for the couple. But the culture clash was near immediate.
Harry and Meghan, and their millennial staff who do not give a damn about royal traditions, have felt the old-timers at Buckingham Palace were out to get them — blaming them for leaking various stories to the Pressabout everything from the location of their new offices to private jet travel arrangements.
The splits in the royal households were exacerbated by the departure of the Queen’s respected former private secretary Christopher Geidt, who resigned in 2017 after ten years.
A royal source said: “Charles and Prince Andrew engineered his removal in order to have more power but it has backfired because Christopher acted as a central authority and he brought people together. Nobody does that any more.”
At the same time, Wills and Kate went through a total overhaul atKensington Palace to position the Queen’s oldest grandson very much as a king in waiting.
As the lives of Harry and Meghan dominated the media on both sides of the Atlantic, Charles felt like the forgotten man. And as we revealed yesterday he is “absolutely furious” that he has, yet again, been undermined by Harry and Meghan’s bombshell ITV documentary on Sunday night.
His trip to Japan and own ITV series, which started last night, have been virtually ignored. But royal sources say it is still Charles who holds the key to being able to bring the Sussexes back in line.
'DISRUPTIVE & DISREPUTABLE'
And right now many in the royal household are pushing him to take action after the couple’s outlandish briefing to CNN that claimed they had “single-handedly modernised the monarchy”.
A senior insider tells me: “Harry and Meghan are partly funded by the sovereign grant and partly by Charles. He could threaten to pull funding. Meghan doesn’t have much of her own wealth. Harry has got about 20million in the bank. If they behave in a disruptive and disreputable manner, that tap will be turned off.”
However, Harry and Meghan feel very differently about the situation, believing the royal institution had not been there to support the new American entrant.
That is why ex-Suits actress Meghan’s decision to damn the British stiff upper lip mentality as “damaging” during her dramatic and emotional interview with Tom Bradby on Sunday was so telling this week.
No longer were the couple going after their various enemies in the media, but it appeared to be a direct attack on the monarchy itself, reminiscent of criticism by Princess Diana in her bombshell 1995 Panorama interview.
In a further escalation of the rhetoric, a source close to Harry and Meghan told me this week: “Harry is back at Frogmore Cottage and has never been stronger. This is an institution full of people panicked they may potentially look out of touch and ultimately to blame for a lack of support.”
There is no other way to take such a comment than as a direct attack on an institution run by Harry’s grandmother and father. Charles in particular feels echoes of his concern for Diana, someone he feared for right up until her death but never felt he could help.
Harry has most certainly inherited his mum’s ability to feel emotion and pain deeply — traits not celebrated in the Royal Family.
Some say he also shares her tendency to have a victim complex and be deeply paranoid about those who actually are trying to help him. A senior royal source said: “Charles’ concern is being driven out of his love for Prince Harry.
DEEPLY PARANOID
“This carefree young guy who used to be the best thing the Royal Family had — messing about with the Obamas, making the Queen laugh — he seems to be sad and to have lost his way. If they seem fragile in public, it’s worse in private. Meghan is in tears regularly and this brings out Harry’s protective instincts.”
For now, royal sources hope Harry and Meghan will recharge away from the spotlight during six weeks of holiday, expected to start imminently in the US. Certainly, nobody expects them to be around on December 3 when the Queen plays host to Nato leaders including US President Donald Trump, to mark its 70th anniversary.
A royal source said: “Meghan missed Trump during the State visit and Harry acted like a sulky teen around him.”
Harry and Meghan have both been urged to cut down on political pronouncements but they have ignored the advice so far. Tomorrow, for example, the Duchess will attend a roundtable discussion on gender equality at Windsor Castle.
Another royal insider explained: “They don’t take advice well and shut out opposing views. It’s not wise but who can tell them otherwise? Harry’s war on the tabloid Press is of a piece with that. Who thinks that’s a good idea? Almost nobody in the royal household.”
Tensions are never far from the surface. There is a plan for William to go to the Rugby World Cup final if Wales get there, while Harry will join him if England beat New Zealand. But let’s see if he can get permission from his wife,” sniped one royal staff member. So what happens next?
One ally of Charles said: “Everyone needs to stand back, take a deep breath, stop sniping and work out what is the best long-term strategy to make this work. Harry and Meghan clearly need a break. If it doesn’t calm down, I could see them moving abroad and scaling back their royal duties.”
Many within the Royal Family are desperate for The Queen to step in, bang some heads together and sort the whole situation out. Especially given the series of damaging headlines the monarchy is already facing over Prince Andrew’s close connections with disgraced child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself in prison earlier this year.
But a senior royal source told me this week: “The Queen obviously doesn’t like this type of drama playing out in public. Her entire success as monarch has been rising above situations like this. That would be a good lesson for some of her relatives to learn from.
Meghan parece que esta ok ... El desahogo mediático destructivo a la CR le dio animo, felicidad y aún , todos creímos que su imagen global se la debe a Los Windsor hasta que su documental nos iluminó con la verdad
MM aún siendo tan inteligente, moderna , y superior a los Windsor humildemente por el bien de la humanidad acudió hoy con H a sacrificarse por esa familia infame , malvada , anticuada, caduca para darle un soplo de aire fresco al Common y tratar con sus predicas se eleven a su nivel
PRINCE Harry made a surprise appearance in joining Meghan Markle at Windsor Castle this morning in a show of support amid royal tensions.
The Duke of Sussex drove his grey electric Audi E-Tron and wore a cool blue suit as Meghan kept her outfit autumnal with a leather burgundy Hugo Boss pencil skirt and rustic quarter-sleeve top.
Última edición:
OMG...viendo la imagen hasta me da pena por ella. Pero es una interpretación genial...el mohín, las mechitas...la esencia de MM. Y las lágrimas negras por el rimmel...
- Registrado
- 8 Nov 2011
- Mensajes
- 1.396
- Calificaciones
- 12.940
Para las que luego decís que no son iguales, lo que pasa es que los británicos tienen menos aguante que nosotros los sufridos españolitos y a Meghan la han calado a la primera.
Venían las dos a modernizar...
