Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Se debe tener en cuenta: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gracias este no lo he leído ..soy fan de HMNOVEMBER 6, 2019
The MM Megaphone And Her Minions
Who actually believes that MM desires privacy when she clearly adores the cameras, and courts publicity? MM clearly plans her appearances, where there was a recent trio of engagements that coincided with an extremely sugary, and over the top interview in The Telegraph, written by Bryony Gordon who has been enlisted as the latest Sussex minion.
Gone was the barely passable face of despair and desperation in the ‘documentary’ a few days earlier, and cue a hair flicking, and bear hugging MM striding around without a glance to those around her. First off was the One Young World Summit, held in London this year on 22-25 October, where MM attended the opening ceremony. She arrived alone without a jacket in a recycled purple dress that she wore earlier in the year in Birkenhead, and made a cringeworthy entrance down the stairs, through the audience to the stage. It was all a little tacky as she looked as if she was a contestant on ‘The Price is Right’, waving to the crowds.
The embarrassment continued with one of the hosts going to shake her hand and curtsy, when MM went in for a bear hug. Both were at fault, and it made the event look unprofessional from the outset. The simple rules of these events is to do a handshake, and if you know the person well on a personal level, then hug .
This was the platform that helped create MM’s image back in 2014 in Dublin, where Gina of Kruger Cowne met with her, took her on, and helped raise and build her profile. Gina was there that night as Kruger Cowne run many projects in conjunction with One Young World, but were there hugs and kisses from either? When MM knew Harry was a dead cert, she dumped Kruger Cowne without any notice, leaving them in the lurch with outstanding projects.
Later on, Gina gave an interview that delivered a few carefully worded home truths about MM, more about her ambition and inferred that MM wanted to be someone. That’s not the same as wanting to do humanitarian deeds, but rather to be seen to be associated with them. It’s interesting to note that Gina didn’t post any images or mention MM on her social media during the One Young World event in London, but chose to share an image of Jane Goodall. Prior to this, MM’s last One Young World appearance was in Ottawa 2016, where MM ditched the conference early, citing she needed to return for filming. A few weeks later she ditched Kruger Cowne completely as she then leaked stories that she was in a relationship with Harry.
She sat there sitting alongside others hoping to be able to make a speech. Apparently it didn’t happen, but allegedly you can see MM had a small speech hidden in her palm at the ready. I listened to the first few words of the opening of the summit, and it sounded like the WE Day speech Harry gave, assuring the audience they were the most ‘informed, educated, connected, and powerful generation’ and the usual word salad that goes with that. What went through my mind though was this was a man who is 52 saying this, so he effectively was declaring himself null and void. How on earth can you have any pride or dignity when you give a speech where you are telling the audience that you are not powerful, and not well educated?
I’m sure MM had a speech in mind, but who knows whether she was asked to say a few words or not? In a few days we discover that MM’s manners have not improved, but appear to have become worse.
Next there was the One Young World /Queens Commonwealth Trust Gender Equality roundtable on 25 October (held in Windsor), where Nicola Brentnall, the CEO of the Queens Commonwealth Trust nearly forgot to shake hands with Harry. That was most embarrassing after MM, as usual stepped forward first and shook hands with a now obligatory bear hug whether you want one or not. I’m sure Brentnall was embarrassed too as she was about to walk off before she noticed Harry. There is no way to get out of that faux pas, although it appeared she did try with some mumbling.
It was a rather strange look and outfit for MM wear to a gender equality meeting, hair up as if she was going to an evening event, and a leather skirt and a sweater? This was a business meeting, yet her outfit was that of an onscreen secretary in a cheap soap opera. Somehow, MM still didn’t carry off the look, as if she was trying too hard and it didn’t work.Stylish, or a messy attempt to look stylish with uneven strands and hair sticking out?
Apparently, MM was a guest and she allowed Harry to come along with her, even though he is supposed to be president of the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust and had working with them for years before he had even heard of MM. If that isn’t an insult, I don’t know what is where she even mentioned this to the whole group, claiming the work he had done had gone unnoticed.
What was key and unforgivable was MM interrupting Brentnall, the CEO while she was welcoming everyone and outlining the agenda. MM rudely interrupts, and asks if she can say a few words, which was to deliver her usual old word salad speech on her work, and welcoming everyone––basically repeating what Brentnall had said, and taking over but in a rude and unnecessary manner. MM, it appears simply doesn’t care, and while some of her fans may defend her, you cannot defend bad manners. It wasn’t as if Brentnall could say no, but here you have in effect a honorary VP, telling the CEO to basically shut up, because I want to speak, and the president (Harry) sitting there as if he was lost in space waiting for someone to tell him it was time to go home.
The rudeness and lack of manners has gone too far now, and yes there is etiquette in such meetings where the chair controls who speaks, and when to move on. It’s not an American thing either to interrupt, and her action was like pushing in front of a queue because she felt she was more important and was entitled to do so. Harry should be ashamed and embarrassed by how she behaved, yet he looks as if he would rather be floating in a sea full of sharks than to do or say anything.
Do not be fooled by the rhetorical, ‘Can I say a couple of words…” which was without a doubt rude in any country because you do not do this when other people are speaking, especially when you are a guest. There was an awkward laugh to herself as she declared no one had noticed Harry’s work, and no one joined in while she talked about herself until she gestured to the chair that she was now allowed to carry on! I have hosted and organized thousands of conferences, and this kind of behavior is never acceptable. Very few delegates or speakers would behave in such a manner and those who do are never asked to attend again.
This is a classic MM trait, where she forces her actions on others, for example where she will suggest say lunch with someone she wishes to network with and then tell them a date and time she has booked a table so they can’t get out of it. Her behavior is indicative of someone who wishes to control not just the situation, but the behaviors of all around her and her interruption of the opening of the meeting was atypical of her need to manipulate all around her.
When MM lined up a host of charities to be associated with back when she ‘edited’ Vogue, the Luminary Bakery was one of those charities that got a plug. It was now payback time, and in return MM was able to use a visit there as a way to get an interview (her rhetoric) in The Telegraph (isn’t that the opposite of maintaining your privacy by not speaking to the press?), and to keep her name in the headlines as well as promoting the new bakery. The bakery opened their second shop in Camden, which is an expensive area and very touristy on October 10th, so it appears that the bakery set up an ‘official’ opening in the last week of October in order for MM to have a photo shoot and video filmed.
The article by Bryony Gordon, was accompanied by a video and numerous photos that the bakery admitted were staged in an attempt to remind the public of MM’s humanitarian efforts.
Sadly, those efforts were wasted as people aren’t interested no matter how hard The Telegraph tries to look neutral with articles on both sides of the swinging fence.
The bakery itself and the aims everyone supports without question, yet they have allowed themselves to be used by MM in a quid pro quo. They get coverage and exposure, as does MM, yet there are only so many cakes a venue can sell on a daily basis, and only so many people who can sit in a cafe or get served. They may get more donations, however, has anyone stopped to think these vulnerable women are being exploited at the same time as they are being helped (like Third World photos for sympathy)? Are any victims in danger of being discovered with photos and video footage being taken?
Gordon on the other hand was perfect for this interview, because she has written openly about her mental health problems. Think of her as a younger Liz Jones, and because she has mental health issues it means that people shouldn’t criticize her or those who do are mean. Mental health shouldn’t be used as an excuse or get out of jail card, but as a reason. It’s unfortunate that some people will exploit this, and I have a friend with bipolar who used to brag that she could use that card if she ever got in trouble with the police.
Gordon has written two memoirs on her mental health issues, but what she as a millennial needs to understand is that what works for her doesn’t work for everyone else.
Gordon may not like the stiff upper lip, but that’s her opinion which she is entitled to, but bearing your soul and body to the world doesn’t work for everyone either. Just because she has had mental health issues (and it’s apparent she still does) doesn’t give her a free pass to be arrogant and to dictate to others how they should deal with their mental health issues. Nor does having suffered mental health issues make you an expert in how to treat it or how to deal with it, yet Gordon appears to have invincible syndrome where she pontificates. declaring that showing you are vulnerable is not a weakness. It’s not, we know that, yet that is what some will prey upon as a commenter noted.
MM targets a vulnerable audience for a reason, and that’s because they are desperate for anyone who reaches out and who offers a kind word. That’s how cults thrive, and they gain followers by targeting the vulnerable and weak. The same goes for predators that groom their victims, showering them with love and compliments to gain their trust and loyalty. In short, they are easy prey.
Again, Gordon exhibits this millennial arrogance because I don’t know who, ‘the rest of us,’ is because I am certainly nothing like MM or Gordon, and I doubt a huge percentage of the population are egotistic, and arrogant on their scale. I hardly think she is a good judge of character either given her fawning over MM, and failing to acknowledge her obvious bad manners caught on film. However, Gordon may behave like that herself and considers it normal and acceptable––well, here’s some advice for free, bad manners is never acceptable and yes, you will be judged by your manners.
Is Gordon being used as a conduit to relay MM’s agenda to the world? If people don’t love her, then they certainly don’t want to hear her. How arrogant to think that you know better, that you are so self-important that people must listen to you? The times I have forced myself to watch video clips of MM in order to fairly critique them, I have had to reach for a bottle of wine. All she does is deliver the same speech and talk about herself and what she has done, and that with her they can achieve more as a team. It’s all very boring, ‘woke’, fake, pretentious, disingenuous, and vulgar.
So Gordon doesn’t like a ‘buttoned up society’, well, there is a huge percentage of society that despise the crude nature of the society that Gordon appears to prefer. Yes, Gordon is at times vulgar, and mouthy, and was once a Daily Mirror gossip columnist (a former 3 am girl, a notorious gossip page) who used to dig up dirt on celebrities and spread rumors, the very thing that the Sussex duo allegedly abhor. Liz Jones (a confessional columnist who detailed her love life and woes) was loved in her day for being open and frank, and Gordon appears to have taken over her role as the column people love to read for a dose of drama. What both Jones and Gordon fail to realize is that people are silently pitying them, while reading them for entertainment. On a serious note, would you take advice from, or heed the judgement of either? Gordon who openly discusses her mental health issues and cocaine habit maybe addressing them, but drug use is a choice, and unlike alcohol is an illegal one.
Quoting and agreeing with MM that we are all wounded creatures that need to be healed has left a huge percentage of the population wondering what the hell is MM on about? Not everyone is a wounded creature, and many do not see themselves as victims either. Real life doesn’t always allow for time for people to accept things, or to heal in a time frame. Not everyone has had the resources Gordon had, such as private therapists, access to clinics for her drug and mental health issues. She may have been broken, but she had the resources for help, however in real life, some people have to work to keep a roof over their head, and to put food on the table while struggling with their inner demons. Life is not so clear cut for everyone, and Gordon and MM need to realize that and stop spouting their drivel as if they have provided the solution to how to live your life.
This what people resent––being told how to live and how to think by those who are arrogant enough to believe they know better. Gordon’s ‘interview’ was sycophantic word salad twaddle that amplified and promoted MM as the saviour of the world! Whatever pills Gordon is popping, it’s probably not a good idea to follow suit if you want to survive in the real world. Gordon may have jumped on the Sussex bandwagon a while back, and she has a fan base because her writing appeals to the chick lit brigade who are gullible and easy to impress and convince. Gordon by her own admission is mouthy, unhinged and unstable––the ideal MM patsy.
The Telegraph interview appeared to be used as MM’s megaphone, to attempt to convince people that she knows better, that people should listen to her, and that she really is a humanitarian. However, what the interview failed to acknowledge and accept are some uncomfortable truths, such her deliberate bad manners evident on video, and the unjustifiable and abhorrent treatment of her father by calling him a liar via her friends in People magazine, then suing the paper concerned when he defended himself.A staged photo goes unnoticed because NO ONE CARES, and she wasn’t noticed in the USA either, because she isn’t relevant, or anyone special.
Bryony, take a look at the facts, swap your pills for a reality pill instead of the one with a flying pig on the bottle, and see things for what they truly are. It can be a bit scary, you know real life, but you will cope because we all do and we don’t need someone to tell us what how to live, how to cope, and that we are vulnerable, victims, or wounded creatures that need to heal. You aren’t in a Jilly Cooper novel any longer, and having mental health issues doesn’t give you a free pass for endorsing unrealistic gibberish. Sane people don’t believe it.
MM used People magazine earlier with her 5 ‘imaginary’ friends as a vehicle for her rhetoric, and it appears The Telegraph is the latest vehicle with a slightly vulnerable and easy to impress millennial to plough her cause. If you did read the Gordon interview, I advise a course of detoxification, and a dose of reality by getting on a bus into town, because you will then see and hear real people living and coping, and they didn’t need to read MM’s words, which as most British would call bloody claptrap, because simply that’s what it is. The Telegraph is a right wing Conservative newspaper, did Gordon forget to tell MM that? This time she can actually use the ‘I’m an American’ card!
El abrigo es una preciosidad. ¿Cómo se las arregla MM para que toda la ropa que se pone encima parezca un trapo arrugado y viejo? Debe ser que le está pequeño, le respinga por detrás no lo puede cerrar, el cinturón lo dejar absolutamente arrugado... un desastre. Los pelos, de llorar y más en un acto de la significación de este. Rescato los guantes, las botas y el tocado.El abrigo bien puesto y con un cuerpo proporcionado, luce así
El abrigo bien puesto y con un cuerpo proporcionado, luce así
Hecho, no sé porque ha salido ese enlace.
Se ha debido actualizar la pagina de informativos Telecinco. Yo paso de politica.
El abrigo es una preciosidad. ¿Cómo se las arregla MM para que toda la ropa que se pone encima parezca un trapo arrugado y viejo? Debe ser que le está pequeño, le respinga por detrás no lo puede cerrar, el cinturón lo dejar absolutamente arrugado... un desastre. Los pelos, de llorar y más en un acto de la significación de este. Rescato los guantes, las botas y el tocado.
Prima, creo que esto no pega mucho en este hilo.
Y citas algo de política, no?
Edita y edito yo también éste.