Duques de Sussex: Opiniones en su contra.

meghan-markle-messy-bun-2.jpg


aquí no tiene y se ve claramente entrada de calva. Tampoco se ha puesto pestañas postizas XL q normalmente usa, y sin tatuaje de cejas q se ha puesto para la boda.Ademas ampliando aparecen cosas raras en este pelo..
¿Y esta moza dicen que es preciosa? pues para mí es bastante fea; claro que también dicen que el zanahorio es guapo y yo lo encuentro feo y desagradable a rabiar.
 
A Kate la ' pillaron' un par de veces con posibles extensiones.
Y pasó a titulares de la prensa. Ella tiene pelo bonito y natural, se ve q ha recurrido a ' ayuda' alguna vez. Luego lo explican dentro del artículo.Era en 2011

beauty-blogs-girls-in-the-beauty-department-2011-10-27-1011_kate-middleton-extensions-side-by-side_bd.jpg

Dicen q esta cosa blanca q se ve es de agarre de las extensiones.
Consultado especialista de un famoso salón de peluquería dice que es posible que uso algunas, en este caso, pequeñas extensiones para aumentar volumen, aunuque ella tiene pelo grueso y natural.
https://www.glamour.com/story/kate-middletons-extensions-how


Bueno y entonces aquí, en la foto primer plano- Meghan se ve totalmente agarre blanco de posibles extensiones. Ampliando es totalmente visible, y se ve hasta más que en las fotos de Kate.

meghan-markle-messy-bun-2.jpg


Claro, ella todavía no era ' Royal' y el tema de su pelo es más ' sencible', no iban hacer titulares de ello..
 
Uf, de todas las cosas que se exigen, LEJOS LA PEOR DE TODAS sería nunca más poder volver a salir sola. Me muero, jajaja.

Lo de los colores de uñas lo he oído antes, pero también he visto fotos de Camilla, Kate y Diana, con uñas de color rojo u otros que no son nude, así que no estoy segura de hasta dónde está vigente esa "ley". Postizas, eso sí sería ir lejos, opino, aunque me da la impresión de que usan pestañas postizas también a veces.
meghan en suits llevaba pestañas postizas y me atrevería a decir que en las últimas temporadas llevaba extensiones de pestañas, eran muy evidentes y se notaba que no eran naturales, ahora que es royal ya no sé si le dejarán llevarlas o no
 
" sensible" quise decir-en post más arriba.

Aquí, de nuevo ' pillaron' a Kate. The Independent le pone titular sobre extensiones. Lo vieron hasta dentro del coche jaja yendo a cena con la Reina.

anotehr.jpg
1010
Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, with what look like bonds from hair extensions entering a Royal family Christmas lunch at Buckingham Palace, with Prince William and nanny Maria Teresa Turrion Borrallo. Picture: Tim Rooke/REX
 
A Kate la ' pillaron' un par de veces con posibles extensiones.
Y pasó a titulares de la prensa. Ella tiene pelo bonito y natural, se ve q ha recurrido a ' ayuda' alguna vez. Luego lo explican dentro del artículo.Era en 2011

beauty-blogs-girls-in-the-beauty-department-2011-10-27-1011_kate-middleton-extensions-side-by-side_bd.jpg

Dicen q esta cosa blanca q se ve es de agarre de las extensiones.
Consultado especialista de un famoso salón de peluquería dice que es posible que uso algunas, en este caso, pequeñas extensiones para aumentar volumen, aunuque ella tiene pelo grueso y natural.
https://www.glamour.com/story/kate-middletons-extensions-how


Bueno y entonces aquí, en la foto primer plano- Meghan se ve totalmente agarre blanco de posibles extensiones. Ampliando es totalmente visible, y se ve hasta más que en las fotos de Kate.

meghan-markle-messy-bun-2.jpg


Claro, ella todavía no era ' Royal' y el tema de su pelo es más ' sencible', no iban hacer titulares de ello..
Meghan es igualita a su madre, sóolo que más clara...ayyy y esa calvicie avanza y avanza, la frente se le está yendo hasta la coronilla!
 
meghan-markle-messy-bun-2.jpg


aquí no tiene y se ve claramente entrada de calva. Tampoco se ha puesto pestañas postizas XL q normalmente usa, y sin tatuaje de cejas q se ha puesto para la boda.Ademas ampliando aparecen cosas raras en este pelo..
Ampliándola me parece como si llevara una redecilla :eek:
No creo, pero es lo que me parece
 
La extensiones de Cata cantaban mucho, solo tenia cabezon! Cuando no está preñada parece anorexia es todo cabezon y melenon, la Tronista negra es fea pero el Petas no es ninguna hermosura
 
No les dará respiro.



Meghan Markle's Sister Criticizes Design Of Her Coat Of Arms

Catherine Armecin
11 hrs ago



AAxWX0b.img
© Provided by IBT US
Meghan Markle's half-sister, Samantha, strikes again.


A few days back, the Duchess of Sussex's coat of arms was unveiled. While many were impressed, her estranged sister was not. In fact, Samantha criticized it and likened it to a kindergarten student's artwork, calling it "empty" and "makes no sense."


"Extremely improper that my father was not named on the coat of arms, and quite frankly it looks like it was drawn by someone in a kindergarten classroom," Samantha wrote on Twitter. "Our father is American but we have ties in the family tree to royalty in several places according to the college of arms."

"It just seems like the coat of arms was thrown together he's silly because neither the UN, nor women's rights, nor anything of substance,.. but especially our dad and even her mom are not represented there. It is an empty coat of arms so it makes no sense," she added in another post.

Samantha was not happy that their father was not included in Markle's coat of arms. She went on and attacked the royals and even included the Middletons in her rants calling the Duchess of Cambridge's family "dysfunctional."

"Our father should be named on the coat of arms and for the Royals to deprive him of that is classless. People in glass houses should not throw stones. The Royals are far from perfect. Kate Middleton siblings and parents use that coat of arms. Middleton's are dysfunctional," she added.

However, royal fans were not happy about Samantha's post and they striked back at her. One fan noted that if someone deserves to be included in Markle's coat of arms, it would be her mother, Doria Ragland.

"Don't bring the Middletons into your[explicit]! They're a very supportive and close family, and they have more class in their fingernails than you in your entire body. Markles doesn't deserve a Coat of Arms and if there was someone who deserved to be included was Doria," Hechos commented.

"Was Doria included? No. So why would her father be? This level of obsession cant be good for the BP," Monica wrote.

Samantha was not invited to Prince Harry and Markle's royal wedding. According to her she didn't feel snubbed as no other family member on the duchess’ mom side was invited too.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertain...f-her-coat-of-arms/ar-AAxXdxn?ocid=spartanntp
 
No les dará respiro.



Meghan Markle's Sister Criticizes Design Of Her Coat Of Arms

Catherine Armecin
11 hrs ago



AAxWX0b.img
© Provided by IBT US
Meghan Markle's half-sister, Samantha, strikes again.


A few days back, the Duchess of Sussex's coat of arms was unveiled. While many were impressed, her estranged sister was not. In fact, Samantha criticized it and likened it to a kindergarten student's artwork, calling it "empty" and "makes no sense."


"Extremely improper that my father was not named on the coat of arms, and quite frankly it looks like it was drawn by someone in a kindergarten classroom," Samantha wrote on Twitter. "Our father is American but we have ties in the family tree to royalty in several places according to the college of arms."

"It just seems like the coat of arms was thrown together he's silly because neither the UN, nor women's rights, nor anything of substance,.. but especially our dad and even her mom are not represented there. It is an empty coat of arms so it makes no sense," she added in another post.

Samantha was not happy that their father was not included in Markle's coat of arms. She went on and attacked the royals and even included the Middletons in her rants calling the Duchess of Cambridge's family "dysfunctional."

"Our father should be named on the coat of arms and for the Royals to deprive him of that is classless. People in glass houses should not throw stones. The Royals are far from perfect. Kate Middleton siblings and parents use that coat of arms. Middleton's are dysfunctional," she added.

However, royal fans were not happy about Samantha's post and they striked back at her. One fan noted that if someone deserves to be included in Markle's coat of arms, it would be her mother, Doria Ragland.

"Don't bring the Middletons into your[explicit]! They're a very supportive and close family, and they have more class in their fingernails than you in your entire body. Markles doesn't deserve a Coat of Arms and if there was someone who deserved to be included was Doria," Hechos commented.

"Was Doria included? No. So why would her father be? This level of obsession cant be good for the BP," Monica wrote.

Samantha was not invited to Prince Harry and Markle's royal wedding. According to her she didn't feel snubbed as no other family member on the duchess’ mom side was invited too.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertain...f-her-coat-of-arms/ar-AAxXdxn?ocid=spartanntp
La hermana de Meghan opina igual que aquí en el foro, ese escudo no tiene sustancia ni raíces que es lo que caracteriza a los escudos!
 
No les dará respiro.



Meghan Markle's Sister Criticizes Design Of Her Coat Of Arms

Catherine Armecin
11 hrs ago



AAxWX0b.img
© Provided by IBT US
Meghan Markle's half-sister, Samantha, strikes again.


A few days back, the Duchess of Sussex's coat of arms was unveiled. While many were impressed, her estranged sister was not. In fact, Samantha criticized it and likened it to a kindergarten student's artwork, calling it "empty" and "makes no sense."


"Extremely improper that my father was not named on the coat of arms, and quite frankly it looks like it was drawn by someone in a kindergarten classroom," Samantha wrote on Twitter. "Our father is American but we have ties in the family tree to royalty in several places according to the college of arms."

"It just seems like the coat of arms was thrown together he's silly because neither the UN, nor women's rights, nor anything of substance,.. but especially our dad and even her mom are not represented there. It is an empty coat of arms so it makes no sense," she added in another post.

Samantha was not happy that their father was not included in Markle's coat of arms. She went on and attacked the royals and even included the Middletons in her rants calling the Duchess of Cambridge's family "dysfunctional."

"Our father should be named on the coat of arms and for the Royals to deprive him of that is classless. People in glass houses should not throw stones. The Royals are far from perfect. Kate Middleton siblings and parents use that coat of arms. Middleton's are dysfunctional," she added.

However, royal fans were not happy about Samantha's post and they striked back at her. One fan noted that if someone deserves to be included in Markle's coat of arms, it would be her mother, Doria Ragland.

"Don't bring the Middletons into your[explicit]! They're a very supportive and close family, and they have more class in their fingernails than you in your entire body. Markles doesn't deserve a Coat of Arms and if there was someone who deserved to be included was Doria," Hechos commented.

"Was Doria included? No. So why would her father be? This level of obsession cant be good for the BP," Monica wrote.

Samantha was not invited to Prince Harry and Markle's royal wedding. According to her she didn't feel snubbed as no other family member on the duchess’ mom side was invited too.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertain...f-her-coat-of-arms/ar-AAxXdxn?ocid=spartanntp

El link original:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Samantha-Markle-bashes-Meghans-coat-arms.html

4CB4B23900000578-0-image-m-8_1527520152968.jpg


4CB4B23900000578-0-image-m-5_1527519900518.jpg



Me da mucha risa es que dice :"parece que fue dibujado por alguien en una clase de jardín de infantes". jajajaja . Es un chiste!
 
Back