La Generalitat: instalación de cuartos de baño mixtos en los colegios públicos
- Autorel porqué de las cosas
- Fecha de inicio
A ver, no sé a donde quieras llegar con tus continuas impertinencias.
Se ha añadido la lectura de fuente, todos los links de informe profesional médico.
Otra cosa, que no entiendes de ingles un tato, y solo te has quedado con la parte básica traducida en castellano, por cierto, tan básica de biología, que hay que ser zoqute para ir denegando lo evidente.
Y si ya estás en conspiranoia de " investigar" , yo sí Tú, hubiera mirado quién y por qué está detrás de la publicidad de imponer esta barbarie y distorusión de realidad científica y empírica.
Y donde la base de " primum non nocere" ha sido sustituida por " ciencias y argumentos paranormales y un veredicto de un puñado de lobbies interesados.
Lo que yo sepa, cártel=publicidad
Divulgación en mass media TV= publicidad
Y folletos de " información" pseudo científica hasta en enseñanza. Si al final, volveremos a metafísica, porque las fuentes profesionales podrían ser de algún " cristiano, blanco y heterosexual"
¿Quién está detrás?
En una pretensión de normalizar la transexualidad de los menores utilizando para ello imágenes de niños sin ropa, la asociación Chrysallis Euskal Herria ha podido desarrollar su campaña -censurada en Facebook- y distribuir los rótulos por la vía pública de estas tres ciudades gracias a la donación de 30.000 euros procedentes desde Nueva York de “un alto cargo del mundo de las finanzas” del que todavía se desconoce el nombre.
Según ha explicado la propia organización, el hombre decidió donar el dinero tras ver un reportaje sobre “la necesidad de trabajar el tema de la transexualidad en las aulas” publicado por dicha entidad.
LGTB: 'Niñas con pexx y niños con vulva' en las marquesinas de Navarra
Se ha añadido la lectura de fuente, todos los links de informe profesional médico.
Otra cosa, que no entiendes de ingles un tato, y solo te has quedado con la parte básica traducida en castellano, por cierto, tan básica de biología, que hay que ser zoqute para ir denegando lo evidente.
Y si ya estás en conspiranoia de " investigar" , yo sí Tú, hubiera mirado quién y por qué está detrás de la publicidad de imponer esta barbarie y distorusión de realidad científica y empírica.
Y donde la base de " primum non nocere" ha sido sustituida por " ciencias y argumentos paranormales y un veredicto de un puñado de lobbies interesados.
Lo que yo sepa, cártel=publicidad
Divulgación en mass media TV= publicidad
Y folletos de " información" pseudo científica hasta en enseñanza. Si al final, volveremos a metafísica, porque las fuentes profesionales podrían ser de algún " cristiano, blanco y heterosexual"
¿Quién está detrás?
En una pretensión de normalizar la transexualidad de los menores utilizando para ello imágenes de niños sin ropa, la asociación Chrysallis Euskal Herria ha podido desarrollar su campaña -censurada en Facebook- y distribuir los rótulos por la vía pública de estas tres ciudades gracias a la donación de 30.000 euros procedentes desde Nueva York de “un alto cargo del mundo de las finanzas” del que todavía se desconoce el nombre.
Según ha explicado la propia organización, el hombre decidió donar el dinero tras ver un reportaje sobre “la necesidad de trabajar el tema de la transexualidad en las aulas” publicado por dicha entidad.
LGTB: 'Niñas con pexx y niños con vulva' en las marquesinas de Navarra
eres tú quien me has citado antes, yo no pensaba seguir en este hilo.
Y no. El link lo puse yo. Lo vuelvo a poner:
www.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/position-statements/gender-ideology-harms-children
Lo que he hecho es contextualizar quien ha escrito este informe y no es la Asociación de pediatría americana (AAA) sino un grupúsculo ultraconservador (la AAPed) de nulo prestigio científico y escasísima representatividad.
Ah, y el inglés lo entiendo y lo hablo bien. Gracias.
Sin ningunas evidencias científicas.
Journal: Transgenderism ‘Not Supported By Scientific Evidence’
PETER HASSON
Reporter, Associate Editor
8:09 PM 0822/2016
Although popular culture and many of the leading media organizations have bought wholeheartedly into the idea that gender identity is something distinct from one’s biological sex — that a man could be born in a woman’s body or vice versa — such beliefs have no grounding in any credible scientific evidence, according to a report published Monday in the journal The New Atlantis.
Arizona State University professor of statistics and biostatistics Lawrence S. Mayer and John Hopkins University Medical School professor of psychiatrics Paul McHugh co-authored the report, which examined top peer-reviewed studies in the biological, psychological, and social sciences.
“Examining research from the biological, psychological, and social sciences, this report shows that some of the most frequently heard claims about sexuality and gender are not supported by scientific evidence,” they noted.
Among the key findings listed by the authors was that, “The hypothesis that gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex — that a person might be ‘a man trapped in a woman’s body’ or ‘a woman trapped in a man’s body’ — is not supported by scientific evidence
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/22/j...pported-by-scientific-evidence/#ixzz4VmEPoVd5
:....:.....................
Ver para creer:
El patético mensaje de " progress" org. sobre el " hate" colegio pediatra que se ha atrevido contar la realidad.
Ya vemos, de dónde ha salido la inspiración de acoso en el hilo
Journal: Transgenderism ‘Not Supported By Scientific Evidence’
PETER HASSON
Reporter, Associate Editor
8:09 PM 0822/2016
Although popular culture and many of the leading media organizations have bought wholeheartedly into the idea that gender identity is something distinct from one’s biological sex — that a man could be born in a woman’s body or vice versa — such beliefs have no grounding in any credible scientific evidence, according to a report published Monday in the journal The New Atlantis.
Arizona State University professor of statistics and biostatistics Lawrence S. Mayer and John Hopkins University Medical School professor of psychiatrics Paul McHugh co-authored the report, which examined top peer-reviewed studies in the biological, psychological, and social sciences.
“Examining research from the biological, psychological, and social sciences, this report shows that some of the most frequently heard claims about sexuality and gender are not supported by scientific evidence,” they noted.
Among the key findings listed by the authors was that, “The hypothesis that gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex — that a person might be ‘a man trapped in a woman’s body’ or ‘a woman trapped in a man’s body’ — is not supported by scientific evidence
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/22/j...pported-by-scientific-evidence/#ixzz4VmEPoVd5
:....:.....................
Ver para creer:
El patético mensaje de " progress" org. sobre el " hate" colegio pediatra que se ha atrevido contar la realidad.
Ya vemos, de dónde ha salido la inspiración de acoso en el hilo
Última edición:
Pongo más información de la ACPeds:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...rite-medical-association-is-a-hate-group.html
ANTI-SCIENCE
The Religious Right’s Favorite Medical Association Is a Hate Group
Frequently cited by conservative news sites, the American College of Pediatricians is a fringe group of anti-LGBT doctors.
SAMANTHA ALLEN
04.06.16 7:00 AM ET
The American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) has a perfect name. It sounds weighty and significant. It connotes expertise. It looks good in print.
But in reality, the name functions as a façade of respectability for a small association of pediatricians that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has labeled “an anti-LGBT hate group.”
ACPeds is a favored citation among the far right because the organization disagrees with most major medical associations on LGBT and other social issues. It is not the leading organization for U.S. pediatricians. That would be the similarly named American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which has 64,000 members. The much smaller ACPeds was founded in 2002 to protest the AAP’s support for same-sex adoption.
But despite its small size, the Gainesville, Florida-based ACPeds makes frequent appearances in conservative news articles, especially stories about LGBT issues.
ACPeds recently published a position statement arguing that transgender health care for youth is a form of “child abuse.” Breitbart, The Daily Caller, and The Blaze promptly published that claim without contrasting their primary source with the AAP. The truth is that most major professional organizations in the health care industry affirm the validity of transgender identity and that the AAP supports transgender youth.
This is far from the first time that ACPeds has been the darling of a conservative media desperate to undermine scientific consensus.
Another recent Breitbart story sourced from an ACPeds press release promoted the myth that there is a “strong link” between abortion and breast cancer. Meanwhile, the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have found no evidence to support this association (PDF), which is often peddled by abortion opponents to frighten women.
When a Utah judge reversed his decision to remove a foster child from the care of a Utah lesbian couple last November, Breitbart cited ACPeds to argue “that children need both a mother and father in order to experience healthy development.” However, 73 of 77 scholarly studies on this subject found that children with same-sex parents “fare no worse than other children,” according to a comprehensive Columbia Law School review. The four studies that came to a different conclusion were methodologically flawed.
And, last year, when ACPeds referred to the nationwide legalization of same-sex marriage as “a tragic day for America’s children,” subsequent news reports gave some readers reason to believe that medical professionals were concerned about the effects of same-sex parenting on children. In fact, the AAP supports same-sex marriage and parenting.
An AAP spokesperson told The Daily Beast that the organization has no official comment on ACPeds. But the spokesperson was quick to emphasize the AAP’s support for LGBT youth. The AAP even co-wrote a letter to U.S. governors opposing the recent wave of legislation targeting transgender students’ access to bathrooms and locker rooms (PDF).
The AAP and ACPeds differ on this and many other issues. The latter group opposes comprehensive sex education, preferring an abstinence-only approach. They decry efforts to ban the dangerous practice of conversion therapy on LGBT minors. They are defenders of “traditional marriage” and strict opponents of abortion rights. The group’s “About Us” page makes repeated references to the “father-mother family unit,” which it believes to be “the optimal setting for childhood development.”
But despite its sharp deviation from the AAP and other professional associations, ACPeds still sees itself as a scientific organization beleaguered by political correctness.
“[ACPeds] has documented the politically incorrect science addressing many ‘hot button’ social issues of our day,” ACPeds president Dr. Michelle Cretella told The Daily Beast in an email, brushing aside the SPLC’s comments on the group as “ad hominem attacks” that ignore the group’s science.
“Scientific facts may be politically incorrect and unwelcome,” she wrote, “but in and of themselves they are not hateful.”
It is not clear how many physicians belong to ACPeds. In 2012, the SPLC estimated it has about 200 members, which would mean it is about 300 times smaller than the AAP. Cretella did not answer a direct question about the association’s membership count.
“It matters not whether we have hundreds of members across the nation or several thousand members across the nation,” she wrote in response. “The sterilization of children is unethical regardless of how many support it, what credentials follow their names, or the number of professional organizations to which they belong.”
Her sterilization comments are a reference to medical treatment for transgender youth, who can take puberty blockers at a young age under a physician’s care. But, as the AAP notes, the effects of puberty blockers are “completely reversible when the medications are stopped.” The fertility of transgender youth is only affected if, as teenagers, they consult with a doctor and begin taking hormones that match their gender identity.
Cretella also told The Daily Beast that many ACPeds pediatricians “still are or have been members of the AAP” and that the larger group’s position statements do not necessarily reflect the views of all of its members.
“The AAP does not speak for its 60,000 members, let alone all pediatricians,” she said.
That doesn’t stop conservative journalists from pretending as if ACPeds speaks for a substantial body of pediatricians.
“[T]hanks to its deceptive name—which makes it sound as if it is the mainstream professional organization for pediatricians—ACPeds often serves as a supposedly scientific source for groups pushing utter falsehoods about LGBT people,” the SPLC’s Ryan Lenz observed in 2012.
Breitbart recently referred to it as “the professional association of pediatricians.” The Daily Caller simply quoted its mission statement for a March story. Often the organization is left to stand on its name alone, as if it were a known quantity like the CDC or the FBI instead of the small conservative group that the slightest investigation would reveal it to be.
On its webpage, ACPeds simply describes itself as “a national organization of pediatricians and other healthcare professionals dedicated to the health and well-being of children” and that description is often taken at face value. Dig any deeper and the illusion of political neutrality would be shattered.
But Cretella told The Daily Beast that she does not believe the name gives a false impression of the legitimacy of the association’s claims.
“Our name states exactly what and who we are: a national scientific organization of pediatric physicians and health care providers dedicated to the best for children, not funded by commercial interests, as is the AAP,” she said.
The group’s name will likely mislead far-right journalists and readers alike for some time to come. But in a sense, the stubborn persistence of ACPeds citations could be interpreted as a sign of progress. If this is the only medical association that anti-LGBT media outlets can find to support their arguments, the broader battle is clearly over.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...rite-medical-association-is-a-hate-group.html
ANTI-SCIENCE
The Religious Right’s Favorite Medical Association Is a Hate Group
Frequently cited by conservative news sites, the American College of Pediatricians is a fringe group of anti-LGBT doctors.
SAMANTHA ALLEN
04.06.16 7:00 AM ET
The American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) has a perfect name. It sounds weighty and significant. It connotes expertise. It looks good in print.
But in reality, the name functions as a façade of respectability for a small association of pediatricians that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has labeled “an anti-LGBT hate group.”
ACPeds is a favored citation among the far right because the organization disagrees with most major medical associations on LGBT and other social issues. It is not the leading organization for U.S. pediatricians. That would be the similarly named American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which has 64,000 members. The much smaller ACPeds was founded in 2002 to protest the AAP’s support for same-sex adoption.
But despite its small size, the Gainesville, Florida-based ACPeds makes frequent appearances in conservative news articles, especially stories about LGBT issues.
ACPeds recently published a position statement arguing that transgender health care for youth is a form of “child abuse.” Breitbart, The Daily Caller, and The Blaze promptly published that claim without contrasting their primary source with the AAP. The truth is that most major professional organizations in the health care industry affirm the validity of transgender identity and that the AAP supports transgender youth.
This is far from the first time that ACPeds has been the darling of a conservative media desperate to undermine scientific consensus.
Another recent Breitbart story sourced from an ACPeds press release promoted the myth that there is a “strong link” between abortion and breast cancer. Meanwhile, the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have found no evidence to support this association (PDF), which is often peddled by abortion opponents to frighten women.
When a Utah judge reversed his decision to remove a foster child from the care of a Utah lesbian couple last November, Breitbart cited ACPeds to argue “that children need both a mother and father in order to experience healthy development.” However, 73 of 77 scholarly studies on this subject found that children with same-sex parents “fare no worse than other children,” according to a comprehensive Columbia Law School review. The four studies that came to a different conclusion were methodologically flawed.
And, last year, when ACPeds referred to the nationwide legalization of same-sex marriage as “a tragic day for America’s children,” subsequent news reports gave some readers reason to believe that medical professionals were concerned about the effects of same-sex parenting on children. In fact, the AAP supports same-sex marriage and parenting.
An AAP spokesperson told The Daily Beast that the organization has no official comment on ACPeds. But the spokesperson was quick to emphasize the AAP’s support for LGBT youth. The AAP even co-wrote a letter to U.S. governors opposing the recent wave of legislation targeting transgender students’ access to bathrooms and locker rooms (PDF).
The AAP and ACPeds differ on this and many other issues. The latter group opposes comprehensive sex education, preferring an abstinence-only approach. They decry efforts to ban the dangerous practice of conversion therapy on LGBT minors. They are defenders of “traditional marriage” and strict opponents of abortion rights. The group’s “About Us” page makes repeated references to the “father-mother family unit,” which it believes to be “the optimal setting for childhood development.”
But despite its sharp deviation from the AAP and other professional associations, ACPeds still sees itself as a scientific organization beleaguered by political correctness.
“[ACPeds] has documented the politically incorrect science addressing many ‘hot button’ social issues of our day,” ACPeds president Dr. Michelle Cretella told The Daily Beast in an email, brushing aside the SPLC’s comments on the group as “ad hominem attacks” that ignore the group’s science.
“Scientific facts may be politically incorrect and unwelcome,” she wrote, “but in and of themselves they are not hateful.”
It is not clear how many physicians belong to ACPeds. In 2012, the SPLC estimated it has about 200 members, which would mean it is about 300 times smaller than the AAP. Cretella did not answer a direct question about the association’s membership count.
“It matters not whether we have hundreds of members across the nation or several thousand members across the nation,” she wrote in response. “The sterilization of children is unethical regardless of how many support it, what credentials follow their names, or the number of professional organizations to which they belong.”
Her sterilization comments are a reference to medical treatment for transgender youth, who can take puberty blockers at a young age under a physician’s care. But, as the AAP notes, the effects of puberty blockers are “completely reversible when the medications are stopped.” The fertility of transgender youth is only affected if, as teenagers, they consult with a doctor and begin taking hormones that match their gender identity.
Cretella also told The Daily Beast that many ACPeds pediatricians “still are or have been members of the AAP” and that the larger group’s position statements do not necessarily reflect the views of all of its members.
“The AAP does not speak for its 60,000 members, let alone all pediatricians,” she said.
That doesn’t stop conservative journalists from pretending as if ACPeds speaks for a substantial body of pediatricians.
“[T]hanks to its deceptive name—which makes it sound as if it is the mainstream professional organization for pediatricians—ACPeds often serves as a supposedly scientific source for groups pushing utter falsehoods about LGBT people,” the SPLC’s Ryan Lenz observed in 2012.
Breitbart recently referred to it as “the professional association of pediatricians.” The Daily Caller simply quoted its mission statement for a March story. Often the organization is left to stand on its name alone, as if it were a known quantity like the CDC or the FBI instead of the small conservative group that the slightest investigation would reveal it to be.
On its webpage, ACPeds simply describes itself as “a national organization of pediatricians and other healthcare professionals dedicated to the health and well-being of children” and that description is often taken at face value. Dig any deeper and the illusion of political neutrality would be shattered.
But Cretella told The Daily Beast that she does not believe the name gives a false impression of the legitimacy of the association’s claims.
“Our name states exactly what and who we are: a national scientific organization of pediatric physicians and health care providers dedicated to the best for children, not funded by commercial interests, as is the AAP,” she said.
The group’s name will likely mislead far-right journalists and readers alike for some time to come. But in a sense, the stubborn persistence of ACPeds citations could be interpreted as a sign of progress. If this is the only medical association that anti-LGBT media outlets can find to support their arguments, the broader battle is clearly over.
Yo me opondria de tener un hijo vamos a decir de 7 años que en su escuela se exhiba un poster ofreciendo cambios de generos porque creo que aportaria a mucha confusión y a mucha dudas. Y en sus mentes no entenderian nada.
El niño que desde temprano entiende que es y que se siente diferente lo ha hecho toda la vida sin ayudas de posters ni publicidad.
La era de impulsar el no-conformismo, que maneras de complicarse la vida.
En estos dias se habla de la denuncia que ha puesto una madre cuyo hijo fue obligado por la maestra a besar a otro niño. El video se ha hecho viral en las redes. La madre tiene toda la razón en indignarse si no le hizo pizca de gracia.
El niño que desde temprano entiende que es y que se siente diferente lo ha hecho toda la vida sin ayudas de posters ni publicidad.
La era de impulsar el no-conformismo, que maneras de complicarse la vida.
En estos dias se habla de la denuncia que ha puesto una madre cuyo hijo fue obligado por la maestra a besar a otro niño. El video se ha hecho viral en las redes. La madre tiene toda la razón en indignarse si no le hizo pizca de gracia.
Como ya dije, la información sobre transgender se encuentra en publicaciones científicas.
El poner en marcha, el proceso de transexualidad en un niño no cumple mínimo del código deontologico, como señalan los informes, el 75-94% de niños con supuesta " confusión de s*x*" recupera su identidad después de la pubertad.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2523178
No es posible, desde punto de deontología profesional establecer " diagnóstico" tan temprano, ni mucho menos de someter a un menor a dopaje de hormonas químicas ( XX más potente q cualquier tratamiento hormonal) impidiendole su desarrollo y la pubertad, y por supuesto el posible revés en la supuesta " confusión".
De eso, creo que se trata, por ahí van los tiros de ejercer presión de parte NO científica, en todo este tinglado, y bajo siempre coaccion de " colaborar o tener orientación de índole " religioso" u odio etc.
La parte racional, médica, científica, es la que, al parecer cuenta menos.
La música de "homófobo" , " anti", " hate" ya esta muy cansina y hasta peligrosa, según el caso donde se interpone sobre la realidad empírica. No me interesa quién ha llegado a la conclusión de perjuicio de poner en marcha el proceso niño->transgender, sino el punto científico, médico y de lógica.
94% de niños de " confusión de s*x*" tiene esperanza de recuperarse después de pubertad, y sentirse otra vez en el s*x* que biológicamente les corresponde. Eso lo dice todo.
Además, el tratamiento de dopar al niño con hormonas químicas y después de por vida traerá consecuencias y efectos secundarios graves. Si eso es " hate", apaga y vamos. O quizás interesa atrapar al niño en " su decisión" a la edad de 3-12 años para que no la cambie, pasando la pubertad o durante etapa de adolescencia.
Hay realidad científica y médica, y parece que hay buitres en la caza de quién podría hacer uso de esta información, para descalificar la misma.
Y en su absurdo, pecan del mismo error de lógica: primero discriminan al autor o mensajero por su supuesta " orientación"y para más inri le atribuyen también la discriminacion.
En fin.....
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885
El poner en marcha, el proceso de transexualidad en un niño no cumple mínimo del código deontologico, como señalan los informes, el 75-94% de niños con supuesta " confusión de s*x*" recupera su identidad después de la pubertad.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2523178
No es posible, desde punto de deontología profesional establecer " diagnóstico" tan temprano, ni mucho menos de someter a un menor a dopaje de hormonas químicas ( XX más potente q cualquier tratamiento hormonal) impidiendole su desarrollo y la pubertad, y por supuesto el posible revés en la supuesta " confusión".
De eso, creo que se trata, por ahí van los tiros de ejercer presión de parte NO científica, en todo este tinglado, y bajo siempre coaccion de " colaborar o tener orientación de índole " religioso" u odio etc.
La parte racional, médica, científica, es la que, al parecer cuenta menos.
La música de "homófobo" , " anti", " hate" ya esta muy cansina y hasta peligrosa, según el caso donde se interpone sobre la realidad empírica. No me interesa quién ha llegado a la conclusión de perjuicio de poner en marcha el proceso niño->transgender, sino el punto científico, médico y de lógica.
94% de niños de " confusión de s*x*" tiene esperanza de recuperarse después de pubertad, y sentirse otra vez en el s*x* que biológicamente les corresponde. Eso lo dice todo.
Además, el tratamiento de dopar al niño con hormonas químicas y después de por vida traerá consecuencias y efectos secundarios graves. Si eso es " hate", apaga y vamos. O quizás interesa atrapar al niño en " su decisión" a la edad de 3-12 años para que no la cambie, pasando la pubertad o durante etapa de adolescencia.
Hay realidad científica y médica, y parece que hay buitres en la caza de quién podría hacer uso de esta información, para descalificar la misma.
Y en su absurdo, pecan del mismo error de lógica: primero discriminan al autor o mensajero por su supuesta " orientación"y para más inri le atribuyen también la discriminacion.
En fin.....
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 16 Mar 2013
- Mensajes
- 7.584
- Calificaciones
- 26.300
Pongo más información de la ACPeds:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...rite-medical-association-is-a-hate-group.html
ANTI-SCIENCE
The Religious Right’s Favorite Medical Association Is a Hate Group
Frequently cited by conservative news sites, the American College of Pediatricians is a fringe group of anti-LGBT doctors.
SAMANTHA ALLEN
04.06.16 7:00 AM ET
La fuente de este escrito: thedailybeast
= el bastión de los demócratas pro-Kilary, pro-John Podesta, pro-CometPizza & Co & el ring-ped*filo-aquí-no-pasa-nada.........que cada cual saque sus conclusiones
- Registrado
- 16 Mar 2013
- Mensajes
- 7.584
- Calificaciones
- 26.300
aquí sobre thedailybeast como fuente "objetiva" - es igual que NYT, sólo que la variante "alt" :
lo curioso es que toda esa movida de PR de gente famosa transgender, hijos de famosos que parece todos nacen "atrapados en cuerpos equivocados" y todos los mass-media progre- (cuya financiación no es difícil rastrear hasta gente como Soros y demás ·"filántropos" de la ingeniería social la élite mundial/Establishment ...el mismo jefe de la IAC, propietaria de thedailybeast, Barry Diller más del Establishment no lo puedes inventar ) que combate a viento y marea los datos científicos, sorprendentemente encuentra su explicación en el cuadro general de los últimos 30-40 años.......¡qué cosas!....cuando es difícil no ver el hilo rojo: como destruir la familia y el equilibrio psicológico del individuo para convertirlo al final del recurrido en un peon débil, neurótico y perfectamente maleable en las manos del Estado (bueno, del que maneja los hilos del estado que siempre es el Deep State )
- es igual que NYT, sólo que la variante "alt" :..el Chairman de IAC Company, el propietario de entre otras cosas The Daily Beast, es hombre del Establishment que hizo campaña para Kilary
los hechos, si no te crees:
1. "The Clinton campaign rolled out the list of 40 CEO supporters after announcing 52 other business leaders who endorsed Clinton over the summer. That list included The Chernin Group CEO Peter Chernin, IAC chairman Barry Diller, Netflix founder and CEO Reed Hastings, Tumblr founder and CEO David Karp, and Alphabet executive chairman Eric Schmidt.
“A growing number of business leaders recognize Hillary Clinton is the right candidate for the economy,” campaign chairman John Podesta said of the endorsements in a statement."
http://www.tubefilter.com/2016/09/23/youtube-ceo-susan-wojcicki-endorsing-hillary-clinton/
2. El CV del chairman de The Daily Beast
FOX, The Paramount Pictures, Coca Cola y un largo etcétera
http://iac.com/about/leadership/iac-senior-management/barry-diller
lo curioso es que toda esa movida de PR de gente famosa transgender, hijos de famosos que parece todos nacen "atrapados en cuerpos equivocados"
y todos los mass-media progre- (cuya financiación no es difícil rastrear hasta gente como Soros y demás ·"filántropos" de ...el mismo jefe de la IAC, propietaria de thedailybeast, Barry Diller más del Establishment no lo puedes inventar ) que combate a viento y marea los datos científicos, sorprendentemente encuentra su explicación en el cuadro general de los últimos 30-40 años.......¡qué cosas!....cuando es difícil no ver el hilo rojo: como destruir la familia y el equilibrio psicológico del individuo para convertirlo al final del recurrido en un peon débil, neurótico y perfectamente maleable en las manos del Estado (bueno, del que maneja los hilos del estado que siempre es el Deep State )- Registrado
- 16 Mar 2013
- Mensajes
- 7.584
- Calificaciones
- 26.300
Feminist Camille Paglia Calls Out ‘Transgender Mania’ and Says Parents Who Indulge Kids Are Committing Child Abuse (VIDEO)
November 6, 2015 by Aleister 23 Comments
Professor and author Camille Paglia recently gave an interview to a TV show in South America, during which she criticized the new fad-like obsession with transgenderism.
She calls ‘Transgender Mania’ a symptom of cultural collapse and also says that parents who indulge young children in this are committing child abuse.
CNS News reports:
Paglia: ‘Transgender Mania’ is a Symptom of West’s Cultural Collapse
“Nothing… better defines the decadence of the West to the jihadists than our toleration of open homosexuality and this transgender mania now,” Paglia said during an October 22 interview on the Brazilian television program Roda Viva.
Paglia also said during the interview that “transgender propagandists” are overstating their case.
“I think that the transgender propagandists make wildly inflated claims about the multiplicity of gender,” she said.
“Sex reassignment surgery, even today with all of its advances, cannot in fact change anyone’s sex, okay. You can define yourself as a trans man, or a trans woman, as one of these new gradations along the scale. But ultimately, every single cell in the human body, the DNA in that cell, remains coded for your biological birth.
“So there are a lot of lies being propagated at the present moment, which I think is not in anyone’s best interest.
“Now what I’m concerned about is the popularity and the availability of sex reassignment surgery, so that someone who doesn’t feel that he or she belongs to the biological birth, gender. People are being encouraged to intervene in the process.
“Parents are now encouraged to subject the child to procedures that I think are a form of child abuse. The hormones to slow puberty, actual surgical manipulations, etcetera. I think that this is wrong, that people should wait until they are of an informed age of consent.
“Parents should not be doing this to their children and I think that even in the teenage years is too soon to be making this leap.
November 6, 2015 by Aleister 23 Comments
Professor and author Camille Paglia recently gave an interview to a TV show in South America, during which she criticized the new fad-like obsession with transgenderism.
She calls ‘Transgender Mania’ a symptom of cultural collapse and also says that parents who indulge young children in this are committing child abuse.
CNS News reports:
Paglia: ‘Transgender Mania’ is a Symptom of West’s Cultural Collapse
“Nothing… better defines the decadence of the West to the jihadists than our toleration of open homosexuality and this transgender mania now,” Paglia said during an October 22 interview on the Brazilian television program Roda Viva.
Paglia also said during the interview that “transgender propagandists” are overstating their case.
“I think that the transgender propagandists make wildly inflated claims about the multiplicity of gender,” she said.
“Sex reassignment surgery, even today with all of its advances, cannot in fact change anyone’s sex, okay. You can define yourself as a trans man, or a trans woman, as one of these new gradations along the scale. But ultimately, every single cell in the human body, the DNA in that cell, remains coded for your biological birth.
“So there are a lot of lies being propagated at the present moment, which I think is not in anyone’s best interest.
“Now what I’m concerned about is the popularity and the availability of sex reassignment surgery, so that someone who doesn’t feel that he or she belongs to the biological birth, gender. People are being encouraged to intervene in the process.
“Parents are now encouraged to subject the child to procedures that I think are a form of child abuse. The hormones to slow puberty, actual surgical manipulations, etcetera. I think that this is wrong, that people should wait until they are of an informed age of consent.
“Parents should not be doing this to their children and I think that even in the teenage years is too soon to be making this leap.
O
Ondina
Guest
Es una locura "elegir" s*x* a los seis años de edad, iniciar un tratamiento hormonal a los nueve y mutilarse irreversiblemente en un quirófano a las catorce. Para uno que va a acertar, se van a equivocar cien.
Esto no es cuestión de creencias religiosas, ni de ideologías políticas. Es cuestión de sentido común.
Esto no es cuestión de creencias religiosas, ni de ideologías políticas. Es cuestión de sentido común.
Última edición por un moderador:
