EIIL/ISIS: como Al Qaeda, fueron creados por la CIA y la OTAN (1 Viewer)

Registrado
16 Mar 2013
Mensajes
6.377
Calificaciones
21.265
transformaciones, mergers, cambio de nombres y ropa...pero allí se queda:

Tahrir al-Sham: Al-Qaeda's latest incarnation in Syria

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-38934206


The group's leader, Abu-Jabir, has called on other rebels to join his group and topple the Syrian government

como no, con el objetivo de siempre: cambio del régimen - quitar Assad, aliado de Iran & Rusia...e instaurar...lo que toque...pero que no sea aliado de los enemigos USA ;)...que, nooooo...que son "los rebeldes sirios, que luchan para la libertaZZ" :rolleyes::LOL::banghead::banghead:
 

Registrado
31 Mar 2016
Mensajes
4.593
Calificaciones
12.562
El líder del Estado Islámico admite la derrota en Irak y ofrece un "discurso de despedida"
Publicado: 1 mar 2017 11:35 GMT | Última actualización: 1 mar 2017 14:58 GMT

Todo sobre este tema
El líder del Estado Islámico (EI), Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi, ha admitido en un discurso las derrotas sufridas en los últimos combates y ha instado a los yihadistas a huir y esconderse, informa la cadena iraquí Alsumaria.

Según una fuente anónima citada por la cadena, Al Baghdadi se ha referido a su discurso como "de despedida". El mando terrorista lo ha divulgado entre los predicadores del EI y ha explicado cuál es la situación de la organización. Por su parte, los propagandistas de la entidad comentaron "las derrotas que están sufriendo en la provincia de Nínive y en otras partes de Irak". Al Baghdadi ha llamado a los terroristas a "dirigirse a áreas montañosas y poco accesibles en Irak y Siria".

El 23 de febrero, el Gobierno iraquí informó de que las fuerzas de seguridad y la Policía Federal se hicieron con el control del aeropuerto de Mosul como parte de una extensa ofensiva para recuperar la segunda ciudad de mayor importancia en el país.

Por su parte, el Ejército nacional desplegó una ofensiva para recuperar la base militar de Al Ghazlani, una de las más importantes instalaciones de los terroristas en el suroeste de Mosul.
 
Registrado
16 Mar 2013
Mensajes
6.377
Calificaciones
21.265
...cuando ya The Guardian va publicando ciertas cosas...la veda de "las conspiraciones" se va levantando...el que no se ha enterado quién es "el malo" en la guerra en Siria...es porque no quiere enterarse...

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq

Seumas Milne
The sectarian terror group won’t be defeated by the western states that incubated it in the first place



Wednesday 3 June 2015 20.56 BSTLast modified on Saturday 8 April 2017 00.05 BST

The war on terror, that campaign without end launched 14 years ago by George Bush, is tying itself up in ever more grotesque contortions. On Monday the trial in London of a Swedish man, Bherlin Gildo, accused of terrorism in Syria, collapsed after it became clear British intelligence had been arming the same rebel groups the defendant was charged with supporting.

The prosecution abandoned the case, apparently to avoid embarrassing the intelligence services. The defence argued that going ahead with the trial would have been an “affront to justice” when there was plenty of evidence the British state was itself providing “extensive support” to the armed Syrian opposition.

That didn’t only include the “non-lethal assistance” boasted of by the government (including body armour and military vehicles), but training, logistical support and the secret supply of “arms on a massive scale”. Reports were cited that MI6 had cooperated with the CIA on a “rat line” of arms transfers from Libyan stockpiles to the Syrian rebels in 2012 after the fall of the Gaddafi regime.

Clearly, the absurdity of sending someone to prison for doing what ministers and their security officials were up to themselves became too much.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/03/us-isis-syria-iraq
 

Registrado
16 Mar 2013
Mensajes
6.377
Calificaciones
21.265
...lo mismo que desde el minuto uno han ido reportando los sitios independientes...sí, esos que recibieron por parte de los main-stream media la etiqueta de #fake news. ya. "nos han pillado en coacción y prevaricación...al ataque!"...o que es lo mismo cuando el ladrón que acaba de robarte grita "Alarma! A coger el ladrón!" ;)

Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad

From the first sudden, and quite dramatic, appearance of the fanatical Islamic group known as ISIS which was largely unheard of until a year ago, on the world's stage and which promptly replaced the worn out and tired al Qaeda as the world's terrorist bogeyman, we suggested that the "straight to beheading YouTube clip" purpose behind the Saudi Arabia-funded Islamic State was a simple one: use the Jihadists as the vehicle of choice to achieve a political goal: depose of Syria's president Assad, who for years has stood in the way of a critical Qatari natural gas pipeline, one which could dethrone Russia as Europe's dominant - and belligerent - source of energy, reaching an interim climax with the unsuccessful Mediterranean Sea military build up of 2013, which nearly resulted in quasi-world war.

The narrative and the plotline were so transparent, even Russia saw right through them. Recall from September of last year:

If the West bombs Islamic State militants in Syria without consulting Damascus, LiveLeak reports that the anti-ISIS alliance may use the occasion to launch airstrikes against President Bashar Assad’s forces, according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Clearly comprehending that Obama's new strategy against ISIS in Syria is all about pushing the Qatar pipeline through (as was the impetus behind the 2013 intervention push), Russia is pushing back noting that the it is using ISIS as a pretext for bombing Syrian government forces and warning that "such a development would lead to a huge escalation of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa."

But it's one thing to speculate; it's something entirely different to have hard proof.

And while speculation was rife that just like the CIA-funded al Qaeda had been used as a facade by the US to achieve its own geopolitical and national interests over the past two decades, so ISIS was nothing more than al Qaeda 2.0, there was no actual evidence of just this.

That may all have changed now when a declassified secret US government document obtained by the public interest law firm, Judicial Watch, shows that Western governments deliberately allied with al-Qaeda and other Islamist extremist groups to topple Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad.

According to investigative reporter Nafeez Ahmed in Medium, the "leaked document reveals that in coordination with the Gulf states and Turkey, the West intentionally sponsored violent Islamist groups to destabilize Assad, despite anticipating that doing so could lead to the emergence of an ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

According to the newly declassified US document, the Pentagon foresaw the likely rise of the ‘Islamic State’ as a direct consequence of the strategy, but described this outcome as a strategic opportunity to “isolate the Syrian regime.”

And not just that: as we reported last week, now that ISIS is running around the middle east, cutting people's heads of in 1080p quality and Hollywood-quality (perhaps literally) video, the US has a credible justification to sell billions worth of modern, sophisticated weapons in the region in order to "modernize" and "replenish" the weapons of such US allies as Saudi Arabia, Israel and Iraq.

But that the US military-industrial complex is a winner every time war breaks out anywhere in the world (usually with the assistance of the CIA) is clear to everyone by now. What wasn't clear is just how the US predetermined the current course of events in the middle east.

Now, thanks to the following declassified report, we have a far better understanding of not only how current events in the middle east came to be, but what America's puppermaster role leading up to it all, was.

From Nafeez Ahmed: Secret Pentagon report reveals West saw ISIS as strategic asset Anti-ISIS coalition knowingly sponsored violent extremists to ‘isolate’ Assad, rollback ‘Shia expansion', originally posted in Medium.

The revelations contradict the official line of Western government on their policies in Syria, and raise disturbing questions about secret Western support for violent extremists abroad, while using the burgeoning threat of terror to justify excessive mass surveillance and crackdowns on civil liberties at home.

...sigue...http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-...ed-isis-tool-overthrow-syrias-president-assad
 
Registrado
16 Mar 2013
Mensajes
6.377
Calificaciones
21.265
El emblemático periodista Ben Swann...el mismo que desapareció, literalmente, despues de haberse atrevido de investigar sobre #pizzagate...aquí explicando los hechos que unen los EEUU con ISIS

Ben Swann Delivers A Reality Check On Syria

 

Registrado
16 Mar 2013
Mensajes
6.377
Calificaciones
21.265


https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willy_Wimmer

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...ants-to-expel-USA-from-Ramstein-airforce-base

"When the agreements [on NATO] were signed, the alliance was thousands of kilometres from the Russian border.

"Since then, NATO has transformed its essence from a defensive alliance – intentionally and without the consent of its member states' parliaments – into a machine of aggression," in accordance with its new military doctrine approved in 1999.

"Now, NATO, in this modified form, stands on Russia's borders. In this new environment, American bases in Germany are not justified – not from the perspective of international law, nor from that of [German] state law.

"Instead, directly prior to Germany's reunification, they said – and the federal government took it for granted – that they consider their presence on German territory not in the context of NATO's defensive function, but in the context of their claim to global leadership."
 
Registrado
16 Mar 2013
Mensajes
6.377
Calificaciones
21.265
http://www.businessinsider.com/reagan-freedom-fighters-taliban-foreign-policy-2013-2

That Time Ronald Reagan Hosted Those 'Freedom Fighters' At The Oval Office

  • As the public debates some of the more controversial ways the US deals with foreign policy and safety, it's prudent to remember some of the less than fruitful foreign policy items where America invested its time and money.

    This photograph is from 1983, when Reagan and the CIA were dancing around the idea of arming Mujahadin fighters in order to fight back against Soviet incursion in Afghanistan. The result was a well-armed, well-trained group of jihadis who resisted (some say defeated) the onslaught of superior Soviet weaponry.

    Once the Soviets retreated, the U.S. lost interest and pulled the funding. Osama bin Laden took interest, and filled the vacuum, later fathering the Taliban.

    The rest, as they say, is history.

    :sneaky::sneaky::sneaky:
 
Registrado
26 Jul 2009
Mensajes
842
Calificaciones
2.278
El Artículo está aquí. Un verdadero escándalo.

US Admits Use of Depleted Uranium in Syria
Between the strikes on the two dates, 5,100 rounds of 30mm DU ammunition were used by A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft. This equates to 1,524kg of DU. CENTCOM said that the ammunition was selected because of the “nature of the targets”.
By Mint Press News Desk | November 2, 2016

Secretary of State John Kerry is threatening to cut off all contacts with Moscow over Syria, unless Russian and Syrian government attacks on Aleppo end. The State Department says Kerry issued the ultimatum in a Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2016, telephone call to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

(ICBUW) – The US has finally confirmed that it has fired DU ammunition Syria, after it had earlier stated that the weapons would not be used. US Central Command (CENTCOM) has acknowledged that DU was fired on two dates – the 18 and 23 November 2015. Between the strikes on the two dates, 5,100 rounds of 30mm DU ammunition were used by A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft. This equates to 1,524kg of DU. CENTCOM said that the ammunition was selected because of the “nature of the targets”.


The news comes as governments are debating a UN General Assembly resolutionon DU weapons in New York. And, although DU use has only been admitted on two dates, ICBUW and PAX are concerned that this disclosure could be the sign that DU has, or will, be used more widely in the conflict.


In March 2015, and following the deployment of A-10s to the conflict, the US hadconfirmed to journalists that the aircraft would not be armed with DU, stating: “U.S. and Coalition aircraft have not been and will not be using depleted uranium munitions in Iraq or Syria during Operation Inherent Resolve.” Justifying the decision, CENTCOM public affairs explainedthat: “The ammunition is developed to destroy tanks on a conventional battlefield; Daesh does not possess large numbers of tanks.”


CENTCOM confirms DU use
IRIN news finally extracted the confirmation that DU had been used from CENTCOM on October 20, and after weeks of denials. The revelations first came to light after an aide to Congresswoman Martha McSally (Rep, AZ) – herself a former A-10 combat pilot – responded to a question from DU activist, and constituent, Jack Cohen-Joppa. However a number of CENTCOM sources initially denied that the information was accurate. Confirming that the data were indeed accurate, a spokesperson for CENTCOM said earlier denials were due to “an error in reporting down range.”



“Without the chance disclosure from McSally’s office, and the dogged pursuit of CENTCOM by IRIN, the US would not have volunteered this data,” said ICBUW Coordinator Doug Weir. “Sadly this is typical of the poor transparency we have seen from the US and we urge CENTCOM and the Coalition to clarify their policy on DU use in Syria and explain how its use fits with its public claims that the ammunition is solely for use against armoured targets.


Unclear why DU was used
The US regularly states that DU ammunition is specifically used only for engaging armoured targets, in accordance with its own legal guidelines, although evidence from a number of conflicts has shown that these guidelines are commonly ignored. ICBUW had earlier analysed the target information released by CENTCOM for the two dates in question. On neither date did CENTCOM explicitly state that it had launched attacks against armoured vehicles, with the majority of strikes against Islamic State light tactical vehicles, vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices and oil infrastructure. Such targets have been attacked regularly by the US-led Coalition, apparently without resorting to the use of DU.



The most unusual strike that ICBUW identified took place on the 18th November, when the US attacked 283 parked oil tankers, however the A-10’s alternative 30mm ammunition type – a high explosive incendiary round – would presumably have been sufficient to destroy tankers laden with oil. Footage released from the strike is indicative of 30mm DU use.
Recently published data from the 2003 Iraq War showed that A-10s used more DU against targets that were not tanks or armoured vehicles, questioning the current US justification that DU was needed in Syria. Historic data from the Gulf War also demonstrated that most armoured targets destroyed by A-10s were targeted by Maverick missiles, not DU.



What must happen now
ICBUW and PAX are calling for urgent clarification from the US authorities on both the incidents and its DU policy for the conflict, and for them to swiftly release detailed and accurate targeting data to ensure that the relevant authorities can conduct clearance and risk awareness efforts and isolate and recover contaminated material.



“Given DU’s nature as a toxic and radioactive heavy metal, and concerns previously expressed by Syrian civilians that it might be used, it’s deeply worrying that the US chose to use DU again,” said PAX’s researcher Wim Zwijnenburg.“The US should provide all target data and technical assistance to mine-clearance organisations and local authorities to ensure that swift clean-up operations for this low-level radioactive waste is undertaken to prevent Syrian civilians being exposed.”


“Public relations efforts are indicated”
The US has long been conscious of the stigmatisation of the use of DU weapons. As far back as 1991 the US military were advised that: “…fielding and combat activities [with DU] present the potential for adverse international reaction.” It was therefore predictable that Russian state media quickly highlighted news that DU had been used in Syria, with Russia’s embassies in Paris, Ottawa and Londontweeting the news, as Russia sought to draw attention away from its own conduct in the conflict.



Russia has its own stocks of DU weapons and consistently abstains on DU resolutions at the UN General Assembly. It seems inevitable that, given the widespread global opposition to the use of the weapons, the Russian and Syrian governments will continue to use the news that DU has been used against the US and its coalition allies.
 
Registrado
16 Mar 2013
Mensajes
6.377
Calificaciones
21.265
La Internacional del Odio
Ramón Lobo
Publicada 20/08/2017 a las 06:00 Actualizada 21/08/2017 a las 00:57

https://www.infolibre.es/noticias/o.../20/la_internacional_del_odio_68745_1023.html
muy buen articulo, gracias, @Amadis.

algunas citas clave:

"De los 72.000 muertos en atentados yihadistas entre los años 2000 y 2014, más 63.000 son musulmanes. Un tercio de los 86 muertos en el atentado de Niza eran musulmanes. Entre las víctimas de Barcelona, muertos o heridos, hay musulmanes. ¿Contra qué tipo de valores atentan los yihadistas cuando matan musulmanes?
Los delitos no los cometen las religiones, las razas, los sexos o las nacionalidades. Los delitos los cometen las personas.
El motor del yihadismo es el odio, como lo es en los supremacistas blancos de EEUU, los neonazis y toda esa caterva de movimientos fascistas que agitan el rechazo del otro."

...

"En 2017 llevamos 3.950 muertos en atentados yihadistas: Afganistán (849), Irak (647), Siria (602). A cola de la lista, la Unión Europea (50), sin contar los de Barcelona y Cambrils. No somos el objetivo por mucho que se empeñen los supremacistas españoles."

"No puede ser que la gran mayoría de los imanes que predican en Europa estén formados en países extranjeros no democráticos. ¿Qué tipo de valores de tolerancia pueden predicar los que han sido educados en la intolerancia? Arabia Saudí es el principal controlador de esas mezquitas legales, como la de la M30. Hay que pactar con las comunidades musulmanas que los imanes se eduquen en Europa, en nuestros valores, para que puedan enseñar convivencia. La investigación de Ripoll ya tiene su imán salafista en el centro de la radicalización. Estos son los que vienen de fuera. Y están las mezquitas clandestinas."
 

Mirando este Tema (Miembros: 0, Invitados: 1)