Alto el fuego en Siria
- Autorel porqué de las cosas
- Fecha de inicio
- Registrado
- 16 Mar 2013
- Mensajes
- 7.584
- Calificaciones
- 26.300
2 preguntas:
1. ¿estas segura que los que vienen aquí con la etiqueta "refugiado sirio" son todos refugiados sirios?
2. ¿quién crees que está librando la guerra contra los cortacabezas de ISIS en el terreno y está ganando en el último año? ¿los aéreos de rusos?
1.-No , no creo que todos lo sean.
2.-Algún Sirio habrá, no voy a ir yo...Y digo yo que cuantos más luchando por su país mejor ..no?
- Registrado
- 16 Mar 2013
- Mensajes
- 7.584
- Calificaciones
- 26.300
Los rebeldes moderados a los que los EEUU y el departamento de derechos humanos de la ONU presidido por Arabia Saudí defienden contra los inhumanos ataques contra civiles de Assad y Putin:
- Registrado
- 16 Mar 2013
- Mensajes
- 7.584
- Calificaciones
- 26.300
un poco de humor...para algunos será negro...para otros no tanto...
- Registrado
- 26 Ago 2013
- Mensajes
- 22.639
- Calificaciones
- 137.621
El Smart versión oro Putin regalo de cumleaños
la versión de serie se llama Supremo Putin Damascus
Trump tiene ahora uno igual
- Registrado
- 26 Ago 2013
- Mensajes
- 22.639
- Calificaciones
- 137.621
A ver, por falta de enlace no se sabe de dónde proviene este artículo que has traído...se supone de algún medio de info- de masa...los queinFORMAN la opinión pública...
Bien: me gustaría saber ¿por qué tiene que haber un alto el fuego sobre todo el territorio sirio según la resolución propuesta por Francia (lo de que España realmente tiene alguna voz en estos asuntos es un chiste, pero dejemos de lado)?
¿por qué un alto el fuego en Alepo ahora? ¿por qué obligar al ejercito de Assad parar su ofensiva contra las cortacabezas de ISIS que todavía detienen parte de Alepo, pero por fin se ven circundadas pero impiden a la población civil de evacuarse ese Alepo?
¿Por qué parar ahora?
(en rojo el ejercito de Assad
---
Esto es lo que tenía ISIS en enero del 2015:
y esto es lo que tiene a día de hoy, con un año por el medio de operaciones de Putin en apoyo al ejercito sirio:
(fuente, BBC: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-37588882,
IS 'loses more than a quarter of its territory' in Syria and Iraq)
A mi me parece que el que propone el alto el fuego en Siria, en Alepo inclusive (que el Francia actuando de portavoz de Washington) tiene el miedo que Alepo las bestias de ISIS puedan por fin ser echados a patadas de Alepo, la 2º ciudad siria, centro neurálgico del país y punto fundamental en la guerra para derrocar a Assad. Posibilidad que parece ser no gusta. Estoy deseando saber por qué, la verdad...¿Son los ISIS acaso aliados de Francia y España?
Mientras que la propuesta de Rusia, que será vetada, naturalmente, no me pregunten por qué, no hay lógica ninguna, a no ser que se responda positivamente a la pregunta anterior, es el alto el fuego en Siria salvo en Alepo: así podrán por fin darle la patada merecida a los fundamentalistas jihadistas de ISIS&Co de Alelo.
(@Ruffin: no soy ciber robot, jaja, sólo sigo los acontecimientos de la mayoría de los conflictos bélicos actuales a diario por twitter. #Conflict News es una de las fuentes de info- buenas
¿Son los ISIS acaso aliados de Francia y España?
Yo diría que Francia y Espana (como Alemania) son lacayos de Washington y éste a su vez de...
- Registrado
- 26 Ago 2013
- Mensajes
- 22.639
- Calificaciones
- 137.621
un poco de humor...para algunos será negro...para otros no tanto...
El de la Adolfa Merkel lo espero con tanta ansiedad
- Registrado
- 16 Mar 2013
- Mensajes
- 7.584
- Calificaciones
- 26.300
Durante las últimas 2-3 semanas vimos algo curioso en el conflicto de Siria: las fuerzas de Putin por primera vez en más de un año no apoyaron al ejercito de Assad en su ofensiva contra los terroristas del ISIS, en la ofensiva contra Raqqa, más bien dejaron via libre a las fuerzas de la coalición OTAN (entiéndase turcos &US) para tomar el control/abrirse el camino para tomar el control sobre Raqqa.
a mi esto me huele a nuevo acuerdo de repartición de las zonas de influencia, un nuevo Sykes-Picot Agreement (jaja, justo 100 años después del original, 1916)...
"Nos quitais del medio la belicista y psicópata Kilary", que si o sí empezará una WWIII, contra Rusia, entre otros (ya vimos el despliegue descomunal, del cual nadie habla pero allí están los videos y las foto cual testimonio gráfico) de fuerzas OTAN por toda la frontera con Rusia..."y nos paramos a retomar Siria para Assad"...
...las diplomacias del Deep Estate, y no de los neo-cons en Wash, sino la del dinero, que son el verdadero Deep Estate han trabajado frenéticamente durante estos últimos días (véase la declaración sorpresa del jefe FBI, abriendo el caso Kilary...armando el gran revuelo...y luego dejándolo sin consecuencias...)...ha habido unas negociaciones, amenazas, bargaining a tope...mientras el pueblo pensaba que elegía democráticamente POTUS...
a mi esto me huele a nuevo acuerdo de repartición de las zonas de influencia, un nuevo Sykes-Picot Agreement (jaja, justo 100 años después del original, 1916)...
"Nos quitais del medio la belicista y psicópata Kilary", que si o sí empezará una WWIII, contra Rusia, entre otros (ya vimos el despliegue descomunal, del cual nadie habla pero allí están los videos y las foto cual testimonio gráfico) de fuerzas OTAN por toda la frontera con Rusia..."y nos paramos a retomar Siria para Assad"...
...las diplomacias del Deep Estate, y no de los neo-cons en Wash, sino la del dinero, que son el verdadero Deep Estate han trabajado frenéticamente durante estos últimos días (véase la declaración sorpresa del jefe FBI, abriendo el caso Kilary...armando el gran revuelo...y luego dejándolo sin consecuencias...)...ha habido unas negociaciones, amenazas, bargaining a tope...mientras el pueblo pensaba que elegía democráticamente POTUS...
- Registrado
- 26 Ago 2013
- Mensajes
- 22.639
- Calificaciones
- 137.621
BEIRUT, Nov 11 - Syrian government troops and their allies advanced on Friday in a district of western Aleppo captured last month by rebels, a Syrian military source and an insurgent official said.
The Syrian military source said the pro-government forces had completely retaken the al-Minian district and had advanced in the neighbouring Dahiyet al-Assad district, both on the western edge of Aleppo.
Zakaria Malahifji, a Turkish-based official with the Fastaqim rebel group fighting in Aleppo, said that while the army had advanced in al-Minian, it had not gained complete control over the area.
The city has for years been divided into a government-held western zone and a rebel-held eastern sector which has been besieged since the summer by the army and its allies.
This week the army captured the 1070 Apartment Blocks district in southwest Aleppo, a focal point of fighting for months and important because of its position alongside a corridor used by the government into the citys western zone
The Syrian military source said the pro-government forces had completely retaken the al-Minian district and had advanced in the neighbouring Dahiyet al-Assad district, both on the western edge of Aleppo.
Zakaria Malahifji, a Turkish-based official with the Fastaqim rebel group fighting in Aleppo, said that while the army had advanced in al-Minian, it had not gained complete control over the area.
The city has for years been divided into a government-held western zone and a rebel-held eastern sector which has been besieged since the summer by the army and its allies.
This week the army captured the 1070 Apartment Blocks district in southwest Aleppo, a focal point of fighting for months and important because of its position alongside a corridor used by the government into the citys western zone
- Registrado
- 26 Ago 2013
- Mensajes
- 22.639
- Calificaciones
- 137.621
Iran Breaches Nuclear Deal - Again. What's Next?
by Majid Rafizadeh
November 13, 2016 at 4:30 am
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9312/iran-breaches-nuclear-deal
Comment
This is not the first time Iran has violated the terms of the flimsy nuclear agreement with no consequences. In February 2016, Iran exceeded its threshold for heavy water as well. In a previous article, other violations and reports of Iran's recent cheating and breaches of the nuclear agreement are laid out.
U.S. President Barack Obama is nevertheless ignoring these latest violations, and the UN and IAEA reports as well. In fact, the administration, and State Department spokesman Mark Toner, are defending Iran on this issue, and appear willing to give critical concessions to Iran in the next round of talks in Baghdad this week.
One of the critical concessions concerns the military dimension of Iran's nuclear program, designed to develop nuclear weapons. IAEA chief Yukiya Amano is investigating whether Tehran has secretly worked on developing nuclear weapons.
The head of the UN nuclear agency flew to Iran to finally put an end to the idea that Iran has plans of developing nuclear arms. Amano pointed out that "I really think this is the right time to reach agreement." However, the IAEA and President Obama appear more than willing to close this investigation.
Closing this investigation means that there would be no monitoring of Iran's nuclear research and development, or of Iran's nuclear facilities, which have long been suspected of being used to develop nuclear weapons. In other words, Iranian leaders would be capable of more freely continuing their nuclear ambitions without probing from the IAEA or the international community.
The closure of this case will also strengthen the hold on power of the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the senior cadre of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and Iran's intelligence agencies.
This is all happening while Iran has not yet allowed the IAEA "probes of various high-profile Iranian sites, including the Parchin military complex southeast of Tehran, where the agency believes Iran in 2003 ran explosive tests needed to set off a nuclear charge."
"The suspected blasts took place inside a pressure chamber. Iran has never said whether the chamber existed, but describes Parchin as a conventional military site. Iran, however, has blocked IAEA inspection requests for more than four years. A deal on Parchin could give Iran some leverage going into the Baghdad talks".
Iran is also again masterfully using hardball tactics to get more concessions. The semiofficial Fars news agency, which spreads the IRGC's agenda, said that Amano should "avoid playing for others ground."
In addition, the success of this mission in closing the investigation means that Iran's position will be significantly strengthened against the six world powers (known as P5+1: China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States; plus Germany) in the next round of meetings, in Baghdad. Saeed Jalili, Iran's top nuclear negotiator said after arriving in Baghdad late Monday: "We had an agreement in Istanbul. That is the basis for the beginning of a new cooperation. We hope that the talks in Baghdad will be a kind of dialogue that will give shape to such cooperation."
Such an agreement means that despite Iran's significant clandestine nuclear activities and violations, the world powers would be announcing the nonsense that Iran's nuclear program is officially a civilian, not a military one, and that Iran's nuclear program is built for supplying power and medical applications, not developing nuclear weapons.
More importantly, it is unfathomable that despite significant evidence of Iran's clandestine activities over the last decade, and despite many revelations of Iran's secret nuclear activities which were not detected by the IAEA, the IAEA and world powers, in addition to giving more concessions to Tehran, appear willing to reach a fictional agreement that Iran never even desired to develop nuclear weapons.
If an agreement is reached in Baghdad, the remaining sanctions on some sectors of Iran's oil industry and Iranian high-level officials will be lifted. Such a move would allow Iran more easily to use the international banking system while there would be no restrictions on, or investigations of, Iran's high-profile officials who are (or were) engaged in nuclear or non-nuclear violations.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned against concessions, saying that the P5+1 should make "clear and unequivocal demands" that Iran halt all of its nuclear activities. Speaking at a conference in Jerusalem, he added:
"Iran wants to destroy Israel and it is developing nuclear weapons to fulfill that goal... Against this malicious intention, leading world powers need to display determination and not weakness. They should not make any concessions to Iran."
Although the nuclear agreement heavily favors Iran, and the main UN Security Council sanctions against Iran have already been lifted, Tehran continues to cheat and violate the terms of this weak nuclear pact. Turning a blind eye -- by President Obama and other organizations and powers -- to Iran's violations will only further empower and embolden Tehran and its Revolutionary Guards to pursue their nuclear and hegemonic ambitions; ignore UN resolutions and international laws; scuttle US foreign policy objectives, and damage security interests.
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, political scientists and Harvard University scholar is president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He can be reached atDr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu.
by Majid Rafizadeh
November 13, 2016 at 4:30 am
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9312/iran-breaches-nuclear-deal
Comment
- President Obama is ignoring Iran's latest violations, and the UN and IAEA reports as well.
- In fact, the administration, and State Department spokesman Mark Toner, are defending Iran on this issue, and appear willing to give critical concessions to Iran in the next round of talks in Baghdad this week.
- In other words, Iranian leaders would be capable of more freely continuing their nuclear ambition without probing from the IAEA or the international community.
- Iran has not yet allowed the IAEA "probes of various high-profile Iranian sites. The International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano is investigating whether Tehran has secretly worked on developing nuclear weapons.
- Although the nuclear agreement heavily favors Iran and the main UN Security Council sanctions against Iran have already been lifted, Tehran continues to cheat and violate the terms of this weak nuclear pact.
- Turning a blind eye to Iran's violations will only further empower and embolden Tehran to pursue its nuclear and hegemonic ambitions; ignore UN resolutions and international laws; scuttle US foreign policy objectives, and damage security interests.
This is not the first time Iran has violated the terms of the flimsy nuclear agreement with no consequences. In February 2016, Iran exceeded its threshold for heavy water as well. In a previous article, other violations and reports of Iran's recent cheating and breaches of the nuclear agreement are laid out.
U.S. President Barack Obama is nevertheless ignoring these latest violations, and the UN and IAEA reports as well. In fact, the administration, and State Department spokesman Mark Toner, are defending Iran on this issue, and appear willing to give critical concessions to Iran in the next round of talks in Baghdad this week.
One of the critical concessions concerns the military dimension of Iran's nuclear program, designed to develop nuclear weapons. IAEA chief Yukiya Amano is investigating whether Tehran has secretly worked on developing nuclear weapons.
The head of the UN nuclear agency flew to Iran to finally put an end to the idea that Iran has plans of developing nuclear arms. Amano pointed out that "I really think this is the right time to reach agreement." However, the IAEA and President Obama appear more than willing to close this investigation.
Closing this investigation means that there would be no monitoring of Iran's nuclear research and development, or of Iran's nuclear facilities, which have long been suspected of being used to develop nuclear weapons. In other words, Iranian leaders would be capable of more freely continuing their nuclear ambitions without probing from the IAEA or the international community.
The closure of this case will also strengthen the hold on power of the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the senior cadre of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and Iran's intelligence agencies.
This is all happening while Iran has not yet allowed the IAEA "probes of various high-profile Iranian sites, including the Parchin military complex southeast of Tehran, where the agency believes Iran in 2003 ran explosive tests needed to set off a nuclear charge."
"The suspected blasts took place inside a pressure chamber. Iran has never said whether the chamber existed, but describes Parchin as a conventional military site. Iran, however, has blocked IAEA inspection requests for more than four years. A deal on Parchin could give Iran some leverage going into the Baghdad talks".
Iran is also again masterfully using hardball tactics to get more concessions. The semiofficial Fars news agency, which spreads the IRGC's agenda, said that Amano should "avoid playing for others ground."
In addition, the success of this mission in closing the investigation means that Iran's position will be significantly strengthened against the six world powers (known as P5+1: China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States; plus Germany) in the next round of meetings, in Baghdad. Saeed Jalili, Iran's top nuclear negotiator said after arriving in Baghdad late Monday: "We had an agreement in Istanbul. That is the basis for the beginning of a new cooperation. We hope that the talks in Baghdad will be a kind of dialogue that will give shape to such cooperation."
Such an agreement means that despite Iran's significant clandestine nuclear activities and violations, the world powers would be announcing the nonsense that Iran's nuclear program is officially a civilian, not a military one, and that Iran's nuclear program is built for supplying power and medical applications, not developing nuclear weapons.
More importantly, it is unfathomable that despite significant evidence of Iran's clandestine activities over the last decade, and despite many revelations of Iran's secret nuclear activities which were not detected by the IAEA, the IAEA and world powers, in addition to giving more concessions to Tehran, appear willing to reach a fictional agreement that Iran never even desired to develop nuclear weapons.
If an agreement is reached in Baghdad, the remaining sanctions on some sectors of Iran's oil industry and Iranian high-level officials will be lifted. Such a move would allow Iran more easily to use the international banking system while there would be no restrictions on, or investigations of, Iran's high-profile officials who are (or were) engaged in nuclear or non-nuclear violations.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned against concessions, saying that the P5+1 should make "clear and unequivocal demands" that Iran halt all of its nuclear activities. Speaking at a conference in Jerusalem, he added:
"Iran wants to destroy Israel and it is developing nuclear weapons to fulfill that goal... Against this malicious intention, leading world powers need to display determination and not weakness. They should not make any concessions to Iran."
Although the nuclear agreement heavily favors Iran, and the main UN Security Council sanctions against Iran have already been lifted, Tehran continues to cheat and violate the terms of this weak nuclear pact. Turning a blind eye -- by President Obama and other organizations and powers -- to Iran's violations will only further empower and embolden Tehran and its Revolutionary Guards to pursue their nuclear and hegemonic ambitions; ignore UN resolutions and international laws; scuttle US foreign policy objectives, and damage security interests.
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, political scientists and Harvard University scholar is president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He can be reached atDr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu.
- Follow Majid Rafizadeh on Twitter
