Los Duques de Sussex dejan de ser SAR's pero mantienen el Ducado. Devolverán dinero invertido en Frogmore. La nueva vida en Canadá

[Lady Gemma]

pues con el dinero que tienen, lo que menos deberían hacer es vivir en prestado en casas ajenas. creo que como imagen tampoco es bueno.

frogmore se lo regala la reina, en lugar de vivir ahí, supuestamente vivían en otro sitio que les prestaba tb otra persona, ahora en casa ajena en canada, en verano, se quedan con elton john, el jet privado para ir a su fiesta en ny del bebe, se decía que era de amal clooney....estos dos pagan algo por si mismos?

Por supuesto, para cualquier mortal con dos dedos de frente este sería el curso de acción más lógico, que aunque Harry no sea billonario pobre no es, pero el problema es que es terriblemente tacaño y se juntó con una a la que todo le es poco y cuanto más caro es algo más lo quiere
"Pagan algo por si mismos?", lo dicho, dudo que SS y los bots sean gratis, papi Carlos cubrirá otra parte, y lo demás será canje, por eso tanto merching

 

[LauraMadrid]

Esta no se suelta ni con agua caliente

Yo antes veo que les quiten todos los títulos..... esta no lo deja ir.

 

[HAAKON]

y ahora que viven en canada, pueden ir por sorpresa a un sitio para hacerse la foto ? es como si a mi trabajo viene froilan a ver que hacemos.
ya no representan a la reina, así que en nombre de quien hacen la visitas?

El cheque a cambio de visitar un lugar debe ir a nombre de SussexRoyal.........en eso consiste el negociete.........

 

[HAAKON]

Esta no se suelta ni con agua caliente

La patada en el culo a Harry se la dará cuando el negocio recién inaugurado genere sustanciosos beneficios económicos.....al tiempo........

 

[bolena]

por ahora todo lo que hacen les sale mal,, y las criticas son malas, quitando de las fans que se creen que puede ser reina. así que me veo que puede ser entretenido ver como hacen el ridículo con sus negocios.

 

[Eleonora de Toledo]

The now infamous The Lion King visit
that allowed the duo to pitch for
work and donations instead of
visiting a memorial service for
Marines who died serving their
country

 

[HAAKON]

Quién se va a q

Quién se va querer raptar a MM, si lo hacen sería un alivió para la corona, a Harry te creo, pero el hombre tiene 30 millones guardados en su cta cte, perfectamente puede pagar sus gusrdaespaldaa

Harry estuvo en Afganistán.....

 

[Eleonora de Toledo]

This is what the public think of the Sussex duo

 

[Malex]

Aquí está quién el príncipe Harry y Meghan Markle escogieron para los padrinos de Archie Harrison
Por: JESS COHEN
Lunes 20 de enero de 2020 10:06 a.m.
¡Los padrinos de Archie Harrison han sido revelados!

Han pasado ocho meses desde que Meghan Markle y el Príncipe Harry dieron la bienvenida a su primer hijo juntos, y solo ahora estamos aprendiendo sobre los confidentes cercanos que la pareja seleccionó para el papel especial. En la tradición real, los padrinos generalmente se anuncian alrededor de la fecha del bautizo del niño. Sin embargo, cuando llegó el momento del bautizo de Archie en julio, el duque y la duquesa de Sussex decidieron mantener en privado los nombres de los padrinos de su hijo.

Ahora, The Sunday Times ha revelado que la ex niñera de Harry y el Príncipe William, Tiggy Pettifer, es uno de los padrinos de Archie. La tienda también informa que Mark Dyer, un ex oficial de honor del Príncipe Carlos, también ha sido elegido por Harry y Meghan para ser padrino.

"Ambos fueron constantes en la infancia de Harry y más allá", le dice una fuente a E! Noticias. "Son elecciones fascinantes de figuras en la vida de Harry que él espera que mantengan a Archie arraigado de alguna manera en el Reino Unido, mientras se trasladan a Norteamérica".

El amigo de la infancia de Harry, Charlie van Straubenzee, también ha sido confirmado como el padrino de Archie.

A quien le importa ..ya es tarde para que esa información sea un elemento a compartir , el animo de los británicos actualmente cambie por ser parte y compartir un evento pasado que se les nego .

 

[Eleonora de Toledo]

JANUARY 19, 2020
The Humiliation And Ridiculing Of The Sussex Duo
In the space of a few days since the Sussex duo declared they were getting a divorce from the Royal Family, social media has been flooded with memes, and newspapers have published numerous cartoons that mock the RF, but in particular Harry and MM. Some may appear quite cruel or crude, yet with each there is an element of truth behind the cartoon or meme. I’ve never seen a member of the RF humiliated, and ridiculed in such a short space of time (from established broadsheets too), yet many say Harry deserves it, and MM had been asking for it anyhow.

Satirical cartoons have existed for centuries as a means to express what the public think about a person or event. This was back in the day when many were illiterate and so a picture could say it all, and while now we still have cartoons, we also have memes, GIFs as well as shows like Spitting Image. How the RF have fallen, and all due to the Sussex duo, yet the outcome was inevitable for so many reasons (red flags ignored), so why wasn’t this farce stopped before it began? MM’s family and friends warned the public, those who knew her either remained silent because the truth wasn’t pleasant, or tried to jump on the bandwagon only to be ghosted.

Paul Thomas for the Daily Mail with a realistic depiction of the ‘summit’ at Sandringham.
The British Royal Family look like fools, and no wishy washy, or lovey dovey statement from The Queen can stop this. Yes, I was harsh in my criticism of the statement she issued because while I also realize there is a game going on between the Sussexes and the rest of the RF, what the court fails to realize are the historical consequences of these actions. The Queen may play the ‘balancing act’ to try to appease the fans, to tell them that the Sussexes are still part of the family, and loved by all, but while she can force other members of the RF to say the same, she can’t control how they genuinely feel. I agree she needed to write something to appear to support the Sussex duo, but many of the words used were unnecessary, such as ‘being proud of Meghan’, when we all know full well that’s not true. She was IMHO appealing to the wrong audience, for the majority waited for a monarch to ‘act’ and not have a delayed reaction. It is this crowd that needed appeasing, and not the unstable fans who cry racism at anything, and from various comments on my own Facebook pages, the public see The Queen as weak and who has given in.

The public have turned against Harry, and if this is the real Harry that has been hidden, then maybe they should have kept him hidden in say Antartica? I do feel that the enforced dormancy of the HRH is to allow Harry to use it again when things change, but the public mood is very much against him having it at all. However, it is his birthright, but he cannot expect respect or loyalty because that ship sailed and sunk two years ago. As for MM, she has her own agenda and she cares little for the reputation of the RF or Harry. The sooner the Buckingham Palace aides get that into their skulls the better, and it’s not as if the press or other social media outlets haven’t told them. I don’t know whether it’s arrogance, stupidity, or being out of touch with reality that has led to their delayed reaction, but they need to still do more. If they think they have sorted things with this compromise then they are truly dimmer than a burnt out lightbulb.
The fact that the duo has been ‘told’ not to use HRH, and then decided to use it deliberately when that was announced shows that they want to keep it and they didn’t volunteer to relinquish it. The respectful thing to do would be stop using immediately, and it appears that they knew the details of the negotiations a while back when some social media posts didn’t use the HRH title that MM loved.

The RF also need to realize that in this modern day where things are progressive, that transparency is essential. The public don’t need to know all the facts, but they don’t wish to be lied to either. From the outset it was clear that MM had no intention of abiding by the rules of protocol when she constantly barged in front of Harry when meeting people. She wasn’t reprimanded because they all knew she would be out soon, which makes the deception all the worse. The signs were there, when MM didn’t attend any UK social events during summer, a summer visit at Balmoral was ignored, Harry’s office fibbing about being booked for an event already in favour of one that offered ‘job’ prospects, the contrived Southern Africa documentary where they began the ‘we are victims’ plan, and of course the lawsuits, and the six week garden leave/ vacation before Christmas. How did they manage to show their faces at the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust round table in October 2019 spouting all kinds of nonsense? No wonder Harry looked sheepish, and it’s because he knew that their official roles would be history in a matter of weeks.

The now infamous The Lion King visit that allowed the duo to pitch for work and donations instead of visiting a memorial service for Marines who died serving their country.

People may say none of this matters, but as a historian every event and reaction matters because we learn from mistakes or errors of judgement. A historian analyzes events through evidence such as images, videos, first hand accounts, statements, events, and also the public reactions. We don’t judge, but we collate the facts from the evidence (primary sources) available and let others decide for themselves what the truth is. In years to come, people will read these accounts and view them without any bias, but what will they see? A flawed and weak monarchy that failed to act sooner? That what occurred could have been prevented and that there were numerous warnings? History often uncovers hidden truths, ones that are embarrassing or uncomfortable, but a historian records facts based on evidence (or evidence that has been destroyed or deleted) or parts that are available. The truth is not an attack, but a fact, and it appears that Thomas Markle senior has accepted the daughter he once knew (or thought he knew) is a very different person, and not a particularly honourable or respectful one at that as he has agreed to a documentary to tell his side of the story.

Other journalists may feel gagged by their bosses, or fear for their careers and may not be as free to report the truths that they know. We must ask ourselves whether that is right in an age where honesty and truth are relevant to a better society? Naturally some journalists will suck up to the Sussex duo in the hope they will be one of the favoured few that are selected, hoping that these exclusives will bring fame and fortune. Surely by now they have figured out they are backing the wrong horse, and to follow the Sussexes would be backing the dead and cremated donkey.
If we look at the wording of the BP statement issued, some have pointed out that the Sussexes wish to ‘share’ that they wish to repay the cost of the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage. It doesn’t mean they will, but need to look as if they wish to. I doubt that they suggested it, because why would they offer to do so? Essentially they would be paying for a property that they can never own, but maybe able to lease long term as Andrew and Edward do. People also ask why would this be of interest to the public, well, public funds paid for the refurbishment and it appears a refund is due because the tenants weren’t entitled to the privilege that had been bestowed upon them.
People may argue amongst themselves whether the Sussex duo have won and got what they want, but they were in no position to bargain and that’s why they instigated the lawsuits and made the ‘we are victims’ documentary to force their hand. It’s pretty low and deceitful, more so because BP knew this would happen. The RF need to hear the public and take advice from people who can see things clearly, and that this is far from a done deal. Perhaps they are waiting for the duo to renege on the agreement so that they can take further action and justify it, but what they fail to realize is that they don’t need to wait because they have the right to protect the reputation of the House of Windsor.

This is what the public think of the Sussex duo

Others will carry on the HRH debate, but it’s fruitless for as I have stated there is a difference between choosing not to use a title, and being told you can’t. It’s like a divorce when one party prohibits the other from using their married name, and if they do, then action can be taken. The world is laughing at Harry and MM who seem desperate to sell themselves and their ‘brand’, but who will want to be associated with a brand that is mocked worldwide? As for the patronages, if they no longer represent The Queen, they cannot be patrons of charities or bodies that The Queen had passed to them. They are either in or out, and there is no halfway because a charity suits their agenda.

Meghan, you can eat with your hands now!

I’ve featured some of the images that others have posted on my social media or that I have been sent. Some have ripe language, so you can look those up yourself, but people are being direct and while it may seem unkind at times, they depict the uncomfortable truths that the RF are afraid to accept. At times, pictures speak louder than words and in this case you can’t control how people react or feel about this saga. No matter what words they release, it won’t change the opinion of the majority because they left it too late. They may delude themselves with their prepared statements, but it changes very little, and while they pat themselves on the back, without a doubt the scheming Sussex duo and the small team of minions are plotting how to exploit any loopholes left open. This is no time to sit back and sigh in relief, but to gather allies and do the deeds that the aides were too afraid to do back in 2017. ‘Tis a harsh lesson being learnt, but the RF don’t have to prolong it––it’s much better to halt the obvious mayhem and misery being caused, that is if they have the courage to do what is needed.

 

[barcelonesa]

 

[Deleted member 22038]

Victoria Beckham 'mortificada' y 'herida' después de ser acusada de filtrar las historias de Meghan Markle

• Lauren Clark
• 22 ene 2020, 11:22
• Actualizado : 22 ene 2020, 11:50

A principios de este mes, se reveló que hubo una "pelea" entre Meghan Markle y Victoria Beckham por las acusaciones de historias filtradas.

Ahora, se ha revelado que la diseñadora de moda, de 45 años, quedó "mortificada" y "herida" por la saga, que vio al Príncipe Harry obligado a confrontar a su esposo David.

Meghan Markle dejó a Victoria Beckham "mortificada" y "herida" cuando la acusó de filtrar historias



Poco después de que estallara la noticia de la crisis real, el domingo el Sol detalló exclusivamente cómo el duque de Sussex, de 35 años, confió al ex futbolista profesional, de 44 años, que su esposa de 38 años estaba preocupada de que la madre de cuatro tuviera estado detrás de un artículo en The Sun en diciembre de 2017 .

Victoria le había dado al futuro consejo real sobre faciales, peluqueros y estilistas antes de mudarse al Reino Unido, y más tarde resultó que la fuente era probablemente un salón de belleza.

A pesar de que las parejas lo arreglaron después de un enfriamiento de las relaciones, con los Beckham asistiendo a la boda real de 2018, la ex Spice Girl quedó avergonzada por la fila y ahora teme por su reputación después de ser arrastrada a Megxit .

Una fuente dijo a la revista Closer : "Vic estaba mortificado cuando sucedió.

La duquesa de Sussex estaba preocupada porque la diseñadora de moda le había dicho a The Sun recomendaciones para faciales, peluqueros y estilistas que le había dado



"Ella y David estaban conmocionados y heridos, por lo que fue difícil para ella revivir los mismos sentimientos después de que los detalles resurgieron de la supuesta filtración en medio del furor que rodeaba a Harry y Meghan al alejarse de la familia real.

"Vic ahora está presa del pánico de que esto podría destruir su reputación. Ha tenido mucho cuidado de a quién mantiene cerca de ella en el pasado por razones de confianza y lealtad.

"Es desgarrador para ella ser acusada y que todos los demás lo sepan".

En declaraciones al Sun el domingo , una fuente dijo: “Victoria y Meghan se cayeron bien, y como dos mujeres de alto perfil en el mundo del espectáculo, estaban en contacto regular al comienzo de la relación de Meg con Harry.

Después de la confrontación del Príncipe Harry con David Beckham, la pareja asistió a la boda real de 2018



“Cuando Meghan se mudó a Londres, Victoria compartió un montón de consejos de belleza, pero no mucho después, algunos de ellos aparecieron impresos y Meghan estaba furiosa.

“Inexplicablemente, temía que Victoria estuviera detrás de esto, es decir, la idea de que Victoria Beckham llamara personalmente a los periodistas para darles una primicia es ridícula, y habló con Harry al respecto.

“Harry es muy protector con Meghan, y decidió tratar el asunto de frente, contactando directamente a su buen amigo, David.

“Harry fue muy educado, pero obviamente fue un intercambio bastante incómodo y David estaba mortificado.

Meghan lució la etiqueta de la ex estrella del pop en Sandringham en diciembre de 2018



"Rápidamente enderezó a Harry, y los dos hombres acordaron seguir adelante, pero ciertamente hizo las cosas incómodas por un tiempo".

"Más tarde resultó que la filtración probablemente provenía de un salón de belleza.

"Después, volvieron a encaminar las cosas, pero les llevó unos meses".

David y Harry han trabajado juntos en numerosos eventos de caridad a lo largo de los años, mientras que Meghan ha usado con frecuencia piezas de la marca de moda de Victoria, incluida la Navidad en Sandringham en diciembre de 2018 .

Victoria Beckham 'mortified' after being accused of leaking Meghan stories

IT WAS revealed earlier this month that there had been a shock “fall-out” between Meghan Markle and Victoria Beckham over accusations of leaked stories. Now, it has been revealed that t…

www.thesun.co.uk