Atentado en un mercado navideño en Berlin

Y como puede cambiar esto, Amadís??, con los complejos y sídromes de estocolmos no vamos a ningún sitio. Cuando despierten será demasiado tarde.
Se cambia con los votos.
Nadie está contento con la forma que se está resolviendo el problema de la emigración y refugiados y de hecho ya están dando marcha atrás los gobernantes. No se puede gobernar de espaldas al pueblo.
* Acoger refugiados y permitir emigrantes, sí, pero con un control exhaustivo. Tengo la impresión que muchos que de verdad necesitan ser acogidos se quedan fuera.
 
Dejo este artículo en francés

attentat de Berlin : la stratégie de la peur (La estrategia del miedo)


L'attentat de Berlin arrive au bon moment pour le gouvernement allemand, qui va pouvoir ainsi dissimuler les vrais objectifs de sa surveillance d'Internet; en utilisant la stratégie de la peur.



En effet, quatre jour avant l'attentat de Berlin, Heiko Maas, ministre fédéral de la Justice, a engagé Anetta Kahane, juive et ancienne membre de la STASI (police politique du régime communiste de l'ex Allemagne de l'Est) pour espionner l'Internet allemand, supprimer toutes informations "complotistes" n'allant pas dans le sens du gouvernement et punir les diffuseurs de ces informations.

Le ministre allemand de la justice, Heiko Maas, avait menacé Facebook, dans un entretien à la Süddeutsche Zeitung, vendredi 16 décembre, de « conséquences judiciaires » s’il ne se montrait pas plus efficace pour modérer les informations.



Pour ceci, Facebook a accepté de confier une partie de la surveillance à des sociétés appartenant au milliardaire juif Georges Soros.



Selon le SITE Intelligence Group dirigé par l'israélienne Rita Katz, l'attentat de Berlin aurait été revendiqué par Daesh.



Rappelons aussi que dans sa jeunesse, Angela Merkel, a été un agent de la STASI.



Le gouvernement allemand utilise ainsi la même stratégie que le gouvernement français qui souhaite combattre le "complotisme" et prône une surveillance accrue en prétextant le terrorisme. De plus, rappelons nous que lors de l'attentat de Nice au mode opératoire similaire à celui de Berlin, le gouvernement avait demander à la policière niçoise de faire un faux rapport. ON NE NOUS DIT PAS TOUT.

https://t.co/tszUswJZAl
 
Genocidal Kaufman and Hooton Plans for Germany, became the Reality for all of Western Europe
Posted on February 3, 2015 by smashculturalmarxism


Since the end of WW2, the European continent and in particular Western European nations, have undergone a devastating demographic attack on an unprecedented scale that will lead to the indigenous European populations becoming minorities in the homelands of their ancestors by the end of this century.

What is the motivation for this demographic genocide of the European people? Why is it necessary to totally destroy beyond repair the racial and cultural makeup of an entire continent and race of people?

The answer can be seen in the disturbing plans for the genocide of the German people written by Theodore Kaufman (Jew) in a book called ‘Germany Must Perish’ written in 1940, a year before America entered the Second World War. And by Ernest Hooton in an article headlined “Breed War Strain Out of Germans.”

Read the following from Mark Weber:

‘A plan similar to Kaufman’s (Germany Must Perish) was issued during the war years by a prominent American anthropologist. In an article headlined “Breed War Strain Out of Germans” in the New York daily newspaper P.M., January 4, 1943, Ernest Hooton laid out an “outbreeding” plan that would “destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities.” (See also: Benjamin Colby, ‘Twas a Famous Victory, 1974, p. 131.)





The Harvard University professor’s proposal called for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers, and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies. “The objects of this measure,” wrote Dr. Hooton, “include reduction of the birthrate of ‘pure’ Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.”

This plan, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to be implemented. “During this period,” he went on, “encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males.”

In the decades since the end of World War II, something of the spirit of the genocidal Kaufman and Hooton plans seems manifest in Germany’s population and immigration policies. Since the nation’s defeat in 1945, the German birth rate has fallen to below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants have been welcomed as settlers in Germany, the number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethniccultural character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.’

– Mark Weber



It doesn’t take much common sense and awareness to realise that this psychotic Jewish wish for the genocide of a whole nation of people is being played out not just against the Germans, but against all of Western Europe and America. Mass Immigration from non-European nations and the subsequent high birthrates of those populations within European nations, has drastically changed the racial and cultural make up of our major towns and cities. This has all been by design, and the motivation is to destroy the racial loyalty and racial consciousness of the European people who have historically been hostile to Jewish subversion of nations and cultures.

It wasn’t just German nationalism that the Jews feared and wanted to destroy. It was European nationalism, it was the European collective racial identity, that they wanted to destroy, the in-group identification that Europeans had within their own nations which kept them immune from Jewish infiltration.

The Jews fear and despise strong homogenous European nations, they hate our traditions, our heritage, history and people, they hate Europeans identifying as Europeans and understanding their specific interests as Europeans. They see the European people as their biggest nemesis, because historically the European has not stood for this Jewish attack on his way of life.

Let us not forget that these people have been kicked out of 100+ European nations throughout history for the very same reasons as what they are doing today, ie a hostile out-group intent on subverting nations and cultures from within in order to control and destroy them making them less of a threat to Jewish hegemony.

This reality of course is always called anti-semitism, Jewish behaviour is never acknowledged as the reason for hostility towards Jewish people in the West. The blame is always put on the ‘evil European’ and his ‘inherent anti-semitic racism.’

Jewish intellectuals tried to explain this by saying that the traditional family structure was a precursor to anti-semitism, they said that the ‘Authoritarian Personality’ created the necessary conditions for fascism and anti-semitism to rise. This psudeo-scientific nonsense was never projected onto the Jewish community or the Jewish family, it was the European Christian family that was the target of the false science that was designed to pathologise an entire group who were hostile to Jews as a subversive and hostile out-group. This false science was simply a method of psychological and ethnic warfare against the European people which sadly many have fallen for.

Germany, which had seen the decadence of a Jewish dominated culture (Weimar), had rid itself of the cancerous cells that had poisoned their society from within. They regained control over their cultural institutions, their media, film and publishing houses. The Germans kicked out the Jewish bankers who were plundering the nation whilst the German people were starving in the aftermath of WW1 and the intentionally crippling Versailles Treaty. The Jews had been sussed out, and German nationalism no longer let them dictate and destroy the German nation.

The tone of ‘Germany Must Perish’ is that of somebody representing a particular group (Jews), and who is trying to convince the world through non-stop propaganda and lies, that the German people were a blood thirsty, war crazed people, who would never stop ‘waging war’ until they and the German nation were destroyed, ‘not just in fancy, but in fact.’

The reason for this narrative is obvious, the Jewish author and the group he represented wanted to whip up anti-German hysteria for the time when America entered the war. They wanted to justify in the minds of the masses that the genocide of the German people was something vital and necessary for the long term peace and stability of mankind. In reality however, the Jews simply wanted to paint their enemy in as bad a light as possible so that any and all measures to defeat them were on the table, and all measures were on the table to prevent them from ever rising up again, including sterilisation and genocide.

Never were the considerations of Germans mentioned, never were the very real reasons for anti-Jewish feelings mentioned. You would think that Germany had just decided one day to turn on the Jews and regain control of their country for no reasons whatsoever. The Jews such as Kaufman would have you believe that the German people were inherently lustful for war and had no reasons to be very critical of and hostile to the Jews.

Theodore Kaufman, was a Jewish extremist, he spoke about war and aggression being ‘in the heart and soul of the German nation.’ He attempted to portray himself as speaking as an American, however if you are Jew wise, you know that in this book he was speaking as a Jew, and was trying to stir up anti-German hatred. He also spoke of the American soldier being promised that he would would never have to fight another war against Germany ever again. He called them ‘our soldiers’ as if he was really concerned about a single American soldier. Kaufman’s concerns were Jewish concerns not American concerns or that of Europeans.

When we look at the Western world today, then what the Germans were being portrayed as before, during, and after WW2 by the Jews, we are all being portrayed as now, as white Europeans. The Germans were labeled as an aggressive warmongering people who needed to be destroyed, and white Europeans collectively today are labeled as ‘racist imperialists’ ‘anti-semites,’ ‘fascists and nazis’ (their image), who have committed crime after crime against humanity and therefore need to be destroyed via mass immigration and miscegenation. Read ‘Germany Must Perish’ or Ernest Hooton’ plans for Germany and you will realise how familiar that rhetoric sounds.

Weimar decadence has come to the West as a result of the same culture destroying group who brought it to 1920s Germany. Mass Immigration has been brought to you by the same people, hate laws to shut you up have been enshrined into law at the behest of the same group. We could go on and on. What they had done to Germany they are doing to us all today, Germany just had the nerve to stand up to them. As a result Germany has never been the same due to the alliance of the capitalist and communist power houses who combined to destroy the German nation and people. The German nation, like other European nations, are virtually destroyed today. Is that our prize as Europeans for killing tens of millions of our own racial brothers and sisters in a war that was not in the European interest but which was in the interest of international Jewry?

‘Germany Must Perish’ could now quite easily be ‘Europe Must Perish.’ It is the same idea, what they wanted to do to Germany is what they have done to us all. Kaufman said that for war to end forever, certain punishments had to be meted out, ie the total destruction of Germany, he said that ‘a great scourge would be removed from the world’ and that a ‘greater good’ would come of it. This is the same language that is used by Jews and progressives today. They say that for ‘racism’ to be destroyed, the white race has to be destroyed and that a greater good will come from a world without whites as a majority in their own homelands.

At that specific time in history, it was Germany who had risen and removed the Jews from the influential positions they held during the Weimar period. The Jews having been made well aware that their dominance in Germany was over, sought to use their influence in other nations to create a World War in which Germany was to be destroyed forever by the forces of Jewish Capitalism and Jewish Communism. The methods which were being spoken about to destroy Germany forever, ie through mass immigration of non-German men into Germany to mix with German women, and thereby ‘breeding out the war strain and the race’ is something I think they decided was necessary for all of Europe which they view as the only real potential obstacle to their goal of world dominance. It would be a startling coincidence if the Kaufman and Hooton plans for Germany had not played a role in the Europe you see today.

The European people in 2015 as a whole, are the 1945 German, Europe in 2015 today represents the vision they had for Germany in the late 1930s and 40s. Ernest Hooton laid out an “outbreeding” plan that would “destroy German nationalism,” does the same not apply to Europe today and Western civilisation as a whole? Is it just a coincidence? I think not.

The mass promotion of miscegenation is not just a coincidence, the opening of our borders to Africa and Asia is not a coincidence, the constant negative and weak stereotype of the white male in advertising media and film is not a coincidence, the growing mixed race population is not a coincidence. They were already speaking of doing this to Germany years before our borders were opened.

There are quotes from influential Jews who boast about what they have done.

Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, an associate of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith) and writer for the San Francisco Jewish Bulletin, wrote:

“It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting those changes.”

Raab goes on to celebrate the coming minority status of Whites in America. Once that has happened, he looks forward to “constitutional constraints” (restriction of freedom of speech?):

“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.”

“We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.”

Is it just a coincidence that the driving force behind the 1965 Open Immigration Act in America were powerful Jewish groups who had been campaigning to have the borders opened for decades?

Is it just a coincidence that wherever there is a white majority population on this Earth, they are being chased down by the diversity deception with genocidal intent? America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand along with the Western European nations are all being targeted for demographic terrorism by this hostile Jewish out-group who constitute a very powerful and influential minority in our nations.

If a book such as ‘Germany Must Perish’ existed today written by a European about Jews, then it would be banned such is the psychotic hatred found within it. The author would no doubt be incarcerated and branded as some kind of mentally unstable neo-nazi Jew hating anti-semite. To write a book about destroying the German nation and people, and to talk about sterilising them however, is not seen as something that should be criticised. The book was an incitement to commit genocide and if you look at Germany today, and many other Western European nations, then the words that were written in that book are being played out across the white world today.

Read Germany Must Perish here and see for yourself the pathological Jewish hatred of the German people who had dared to take control of their country and right the wrongs of the Versailles Treaty.

http://www.ihr.org/books/kaufman/perish.shtml

In 1944 another book was written which advocated the mass psychological brainwashing of the German people. It was called ‘What to do with Germany’ and was written by Louis Nizer.



Nizer was a wealthy Jewish lawyer from New York and was also a colleague of Theodore Kaufmann and Henry Morgenthau, FDR’s Secretary of the Treasury and the author of the Morgenthau Plan. Nizer was in favour of absolute brainwashing of the German people, turning them into conformative Zombies if you like.

Read the following from the official DIRECTIVES FOR RE-EDUCATION of 1945:

“Re-education will be compulsory for young and old alike, and must not be restricted to the classroom.
We should employ the great power of conviction that goes with dramatic presentation in its service – movies can be used to greatest effect here.


We should employ the greatest authors, producers and stars under the auspices of an “International University” to dramatize the limitless evils of Nazism, and contrast these evils with the simple beauty of a Germany that is no longer obsessed with marching and shooting.

These movies will have the mission of creating an appealing picture of democracy.

In addition, radio broadcasts will be used to penetrate German homes with formal lectures and informal discussions.

German authors, dramatists and publishers should be subjected to constant examination through this “International University” as well, since they are all educators.
Undemocratic publications must of course be suppressed from the beginning.

Only after German thinking has been strengthened in the new democratic ideals should we allow opposing views, when we are confident that the Nazi virus has been eliminated. This way, we will gain immunity for the future.

The re-education process must penetrate all of German society.
During their leisure time, the working classes should also receive simple lessons in democracy. Summer outings and popular educational events can help accomplish this.

Many German prisoners of war will remain in Russia after the war is over – not voluntarily, of course, but because Russia needs their labor.
This is completely legal and it lessens the danger that returning prisoners might form the nucleus of a new national movement.
Even if we do not wish to keep German prisoners after the War, we should send them to Russia.

The “International University” provides the best vehicle for monitoring and controlling the details of the German educational system, including schools, lesson plans, selection of teachers and textbooks – in short, all pedagogical institutions and materials.
In addition, we need a “High Command” for our re-education offensive.

Particularly gifted German students should be given opportunity to further their education in our schools; they should then return to Germany as teachers and found a new democratic tradition that combines a sense of international citizenship.

Whenever possible, their professors should be liberal and democratic. The intervention of “foreigners” could have an agitating effect and it must be kept to a minimum, but should not cause us to lose control.

Every imaginable kind of democratic influence should be employed in the service of re-education. This calls for the efforts of churches, movies, theatre and radio as well as the press and labor unions.

Re-education should take the place of military service.
Every German should be required to participate, just as they were formerly conscripted.

The task has fallen to us of protecting world peace and freedom.

This is the freedom that was born on Mount Sinai, lay in its cradle in Bethlehem, spent its early youth in England and whose stern schoolmaster was France.
It is the freedom that spent its early manhood in the United States, the freedom that is destined to spread all over the world – if we do our duty.”


The above ‘directives’ could quite easily be applied to the West today, an ‘international university’ brainwashing the people of the West to embrace their own genocide.

A letter published by the Miami News, 12th July 1938, entitled ‘Kill off the Germans’ stated that:

“Nothing but almost complete extermination of the savage
whites will insure peace on earth and goodwill toward men.”



In September 1944 a French clergyman announced from the pulpit:

“What remains to be done is to kill every German.”

“There must be no distinction between soldiers and civilians in the destruction of men, women and children.”

The congregation applauded.


These Genocidal ideas which have today been put into practice for whites everywhere, have been long in the planning. Whites who identify as whites and who have loyalty to their Race and Nation are the primary foe of the Jews because whites who are loyal to Race and Nation, do not conform to the Jewish agenda that dominates and subverts the Race and Nation from within and therefore are an obstacle to these aims that must be removed, destroyed via mass immigration, miscegenation and Cultural Marxism.

If we look at the declining white birth rate, then this can be seen as a form of sterilisation of the European people. The promotion of feminism and the career over family mindset promoted by Jewish feminists has had a decimating impact upon the white family. The incessant Jewish led promotion of mixing the races has also had a major impact on the white birth rate.

White Europeans have been led to believe that Mass Immigration of third world people into their homelands was something that could not be stopped, that it was natural population movement, that it was evolution. Most Europeans fell for those lies, and they fell for the deceptions that told them they were being enriched, that race was a social construct, that we are all immigrants etc. All of these lies were concocted by Jewish academics and pushed by their useful idiot Gentile lackeys who couldn’t see that they were being played and used to advance specifically Jewish interests.

Unless Europeans wake up to these facts, and soon, then the genocidal tendencies of these people will become reality.

Mass Immigration is the Jewish signed Death Warrant of the European people.

https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=...8CtMPHtyXlo6WWrWw&sig2=X-YIrLFR4VfQralYw8VWVQ
 
Se cambia con los votos.
Nadie está contento con la forma que se está resolviendo el problema de la emigración y refugiados y de hecho ya están dando marcha atrás los gobernantes. No se puede gobernar de espaldas al pueblo.
* Acoger refugiados y permitir emigrantes, sí, pero con un control exhaustivo. Tengo la impresión que muchos que de verdad necesitan ser acogidos se quedan fuera.

Pues con Podemos lo llevas claro.
 
Pues con Podemos lo llevas claro.

Por fin ha saltado PODEMOS, jejejeje. Estarías que revientas si no lo dices.
Ya sabemos que son los culpables de todo, todo,todo lo malo que pasa en el mundo mundial..
También se les busca en Berlín??, porque ya se está tardando en comentar alguna barbaridad, como es costumbre..
Por favor un poco de seriedad y respeto a las víctimas que el tema es muy triste y doloroso.
 
Por fin ha saltado PODEMOS, jejejeje. Estarías que revientas si no lo dices.
Ya sabemos que son los culpables de todo, todo,todo lo malo que pasa en el mundo mundial..
También se les busca en Berlín??, porque ya se está tardando en comentar alguna barbaridad, como es costumbre..
Por favor un poco de seriedad y respeto a las víctimas que el tema es muy triste y doloroso.

Una tilita Amadís que te envenenas toda. Tú has hablado de que la política migratoria se puede cambiar con los votos, y el progama político de Podemos (el famoso catálogo de Ikea) lo pone bien claro, ya lo traje en su momento y no tengo ganas de volverlo a traer. Si te interesa, ya sabes, búscalo. Y si no te interesa saber de lo que hablas no acuses a los demás de comentar barbaridades, a no ser que consideres barbaridades el programa electoral del partido. Todo lo demás son tus habituales berrinches cada vez que te los nombran, como es costumbre...

Y no te tomes como algo personal que se hable de política, que cada vez que se nombra a Podemos saltas a la yugular. Respeta un poco, que mucho respetar la libertad de expresión ... pero solo cuando nos expresamos como a ti te gusta
 
Última edición:
Una tilita Amadís que te envenenas toda. Tú has hablado de que la política migratoria se puede cambiar con los votos, y el progama político de Podemos (el famoso catálogo de Ikea) lo pone bien claro, ya lo traje en su momento y no tengo ganas de volverlo a traer. Si te interesa, ya sabes, búscalo. Y si no te interesa saber de lo que hablas no acuses a los demás de comentar barbaridades, a no ser que consideres barbaridades el programa electoral de tu partido. Todo lo demás son tus habituales berrinches cada vez que te los nombran, como es costumbre...

Pídele a dios, si eres creyente, que nunca un familiar tuyo muera en un atentado, que jamás tengas que salir de tu país como refugiada con tus hijos, padres y abuelos y que nadie os quiera acoger y tengas que vivir en un campo de refugiados debido a personas que carecen de un mínimo de sensibilidad hacia el dolor humano...
Por favor, te vuelvo a pedir respeto.
*Para hablar de PODEMOS ya existe en el foro un apartado, no mezclemos churras con merinas..
 
Pídele a dios, si eres creyente, que nunca un familiar tuyo muera en un atentado, que jamás tengas que salir de tu país como refugiada con tus hijos, padres y abuelos y que nadie os quiera acoger y tengas que vivir en un campo de refugiados debido a personas que carecen de un mínimo de sensibilidad hacia el dolor humano...
Por favor, te vuelvo a pedir respeto.
*Para hablar de PODEMOS ya existe en el foro un apartado, no mezclemos churras con merinas..

Esto es tan ridículo que no merece la pena ni contestarte. Empieza tú por respetar las opiniones de los demás, aquí se llevan páginas hablando de inmigración, refugiados, Arabia Saudí, política y de todo menos de los atentados y me vienes a mí con estos rollos. Si no quieres que se hable de política migratoria, chica, no saques el tema pero todo este rollo tratando de evangelizarme en el respeto como si tu te aplicaras el cuento es esperpéntico.
 
La inmigración es el resultado de cientos de años de saqueo
 
He encontrado el siguiente vídeo con imágenes justo después del atentado. Está en alemán por lo que os explico brevemente lo que el autor de este vídeo nos quiere indicar:
- en todo el camión no hay restos de sangre, textiles, zapatos, bolsas de compra, objetos personales, etc. de personas/víctimas, sólo hay restos de objetos que formaban parte de las casetas, el decorado, etc. del mercadillo
- hay un gran contingente de policías, patrullas, ambulancias, pero en ningún momento se ve que estén atendiendo a heridos o transportándolos en camillas a las ambulancias
- las ambulancias están aparcadas, cerradas y sin luz
- las escenas de un atentado de esta magnitud tendrían que ser diferentes, con gran movimiento, gritos, camillas transportando a heridos, etc.
- extraño resulta también que los papeles de identidad del terrorista fueran encontrados 40 horas después, cuando estaban en el interior del camión
- el autor del vídeo sugiere que quizá sólo se haya tratado de un ensayo ante un posible ataque terrorista, pero es una mera hipótesis
- tendría que reinar un tumulto, un ir y venir, gritos, mucho movimiento, etc., pero lo que nos muestran las imágenes tomadas por diferentes personas es un lugar de los hechos fantasmagórico. Desde luego que resulta un tanto raro.

 
En Al Andalus creo que los musulmanes SI tenían la sartén por el mango y a los cristianos no nos prohibieron echar chorizo a las lentejas ni nos pusieron a todos sobre una alfombrilla mirando a La Meca. Tampoco lo hacen hoy en sus tierras. Creo que ya hemos tenido esta conversación, así que no hace falta volver de nuevo sobre el tema.

Si en Europa acabamos prohibiendo servir cerdo en las cantinas y retirando los símbolos tradicionales de la Navidad en las calles será porque alguien /alguienes nos han convencido (a una mayoría) de que eso es lo justo y necesario. Porque se supone que esto es una democracia ¿no? y que la legislación vigente se decide en el Parlamento y una Justicia independiente interpreta la ley.

Lo que hay que analizar es por qué no queremos incomodar a Barbaria Saudi (los patrocinadores oficiales del wahabismo y oficiosos del terrorismo y¡hadista). Y si la política de fronteras abiertas es lo justo y necesario en estos momentos, visto como está el patio. Y lo que está por llegar. Es cuestión de sentido común.
Ondina, lo de la tolerancia en Al-Andalus fue así a ratos, y otros ratos no, depende si estaban los almohades o los almorávides. Hay mucha tela que cortar en este asunto.
 

Temas Similares

2
Respuestas
16
Visitas
1K
Back